|
projects are disappeared after upgrade from 1.6.0 to 1.6.1
Hello everyone,
i upgraded from harbor 1.6.0 to 1.6.1. After the Upgrade i found the following error in the log files.
Jan 25 17:06:44 172.23.0.1 jobservice[20517]: 2019-01-25T16:06:44Z [ERROR]
Hello everyone,
i upgraded from harbor 1.6.0 to 1.6.1. After the Upgrade i found the following error in the log files.
Jan 25 17:06:44 172.23.0.1 jobservice[20517]: 2019-01-25T16:06:44Z [ERROR]
|
By
Jan-Philipp Bolle <philip...@...>
·
#54
·
|
|
CNCF project Harbor community conference
Hello everyone,
Welcome to join Harbor community conference meeting! In this meeting, we’d like to share some DEV progress/updates/demos of the features included in the release V1.8 by the feature
Hello everyone,
Welcome to join Harbor community conference meeting! In this meeting, we’d like to share some DEV progress/updates/demos of the features included in the release V1.8 by the feature
|
By
Steven Zou <sz...@...>
·
#6
·
|
|
Can you update date on webside thanks!
From 2018 to 2019 just for info that project is up to date.
Thanks!!
Regards
K.C
From 2018 to 2019 just for info that project is up to date.
Thanks!!
Regards
K.C
|
By
Kamil Cynk <kami...@...>
·
#40
·
|
|
CNCF project Harbor community conference
Hello everyone,
Welcome to join Harbor community conference call! In this meeting, we’ll make an introduction and demo for the integration of Harbor and dragonfly. As members of the Harbor
Hello everyone,
Welcome to join Harbor community conference call! In this meeting, we’ll make an introduction and demo for the integration of Harbor and dragonfly. As members of the Harbor
|
By
Wenkai Yin <yi...@...>
·
#86
·
|
|
Cache control headers for S3 redirects
Hi,
We have harbor setup to redirect to S3 storage. We want to cache these images for a local repository for performance reasons, but it seems like the redirect from harbor to S3 does not specify any
Hi,
We have harbor setup to redirect to S3 storage. We want to cache these images for a local repository for performance reasons, but it seems like the redirect from harbor to S3 does not specify any
|
By
Vishnu Vardhan <vard...@...>
·
#32
·
|
|
Re: Installation failing on OSX
Vishnu,
So far, the OSX is not officially verified and supported.
thanks®ards
--
Steven (邹佳)
Engineer, CNA, VMware R&D
Mail: sz...@...
Cell: +8618600021252
Addr: 9F Tower C,
Vishnu,
So far, the OSX is not officially verified and supported.
thanks®ards
--
Steven (邹佳)
Engineer, CNA, VMware R&D
Mail: sz...@...
Cell: +8618600021252
Addr: 9F Tower C,
|
By
Steven Zou <sz...@...>
·
#48
·
|
|
Installation failing on OSX
Hi,
A basic installation on OSX is failing.
All components are installing, and I get the following message in the end -
✔ ----Harbor has been installed and started successfully.----
Now you
Hi,
A basic installation on OSX is failing.
All components are installing, and I get the following message in the end -
✔ ----Harbor has been installed and started successfully.----
Now you
|
By
Vishnu Vardhan <vard...@...>
·
#49
·
|
|
CNCF project Harbor community conference - V1.8 launching
Hello everyone,
Welcome to join Harbor community conference call! In this meeting, we have a very important topic:introduce and discuss the features included in the new release V1.8 of Harbor
Hello everyone,
Welcome to join Harbor community conference call! In this meeting, we have a very important topic:introduce and discuss the features included in the new release V1.8 of Harbor
|
By
Steven Zou <sz...@...>
·
#85
·
|
|
Re: Upgrade Harbor 1.2.0 to 1.6.0
It worked fineThank you for your help!
--
- Bleza TAKOUDA -
AJ Networks Co., Ltd. IT Center, Architecture Team
05836, AJ Bldg 4F IT Centerr, Jeongui-ro 8-gil 9,
Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea
M.
It worked fineThank you for your help!
--
- Bleza TAKOUDA -
AJ Networks Co., Ltd. IT Center, Architecture Team
05836, AJ Bldg 4F IT Centerr, Jeongui-ro 8-gil 9,
Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea
M.
|
By
Bleza TAKOUDA <dream...@...>
·
#36
·
|
|
Re: Upgrade Harbor 1.2.0 to 1.6.0
Yes, you can upgrade to 1.6.0 directly with goharbor/harbor-migrator:v1.6.0.
Please follow this guide to do the migration, and don’t forget to back up your data.
Thanks,
Yan
From:
Yes, you can upgrade to 1.6.0 directly with goharbor/harbor-migrator:v1.6.0.
Please follow this guide to do the migration, and don’t forget to back up your data.
Thanks,
Yan
From:
|
By
Yan Wang <wan...@...>
·
#34
·
|
|
Upgrade Harbor 1.2.0 to 1.6.0
Hello!!
I am preparing an upgrade work on Harbor 1.2.0.
Is this type of upgrade supported 1.2.0 to 1.6.0?
Or do I need to perform incremental upgrades: 1.2.0 to 1.3.0
and so on to 1.6.0?
Hello!!
I am preparing an upgrade work on Harbor 1.2.0.
Is this type of upgrade supported 1.2.0 to 1.6.0?
Or do I need to perform incremental upgrades: 1.2.0 to 1.3.0
and so on to 1.6.0?
|
By
Bleza TAKOUDA <dream...@...>
·
#35
·
|
|
Harbor community conf call
Hello everyone,
Welcome to join Harbor community conf call! In this meeting, we have a very important topic: introduce, discuss and collect feedback on the Harbor governance model, which defines the
Hello everyone,
Welcome to join Harbor community conf call! In this meeting, we have a very important topic: introduce, discuss and collect feedback on the Harbor governance model, which defines the
|
By
Yan Wang <wan...@...>
·
#41
·
|
|
FW: harbor moves to cncf incubator
FYI!
thanks®ards
--
Steven (邹佳)
Engineer, CNA, VMware R&D
Mail: sz...@...
Cell: +8618600021252
Addr: 9F Tower C, Raycom Info Tech Park, No. 2 Kexueyuan South Road Haidian District,
FYI!
thanks®ards
--
Steven (邹佳)
Engineer, CNA, VMware R&D
Mail: sz...@...
Cell: +8618600021252
Addr: 9F Tower C, Raycom Info Tech Park, No. 2 Kexueyuan South Road Haidian District,
|
By
Steven Zou <sz...@...>
·
#9
·
|
|
[harbor-dev] CNCF project Harbor community meeting
Hello everyone,
As planned, in this community meeting, we’ll give the whole community an early preview of the following new features which are planned in release 1.7:
· HA by Harbor Helm
Hello everyone,
As planned, in this community meeting, we’ll give the whole community an early preview of the following new features which are planned in release 1.7:
· HA by Harbor Helm
|
By
Yan Wang <wan...@...>
·
#76
·
|
|
CNCF project Harbor community meeting
Hello everyone,
As planned, in this community meeting, we’ll give the whole community an early preview of the following new features which are planned in release 1.7:
Online GC
Chart repository
Hello everyone,
As planned, in this community meeting, we’ll give the whole community an early preview of the following new features which are planned in release 1.7:
Online GC
Chart repository
|
By
Steven Zou <sz...@...>
·
#47
·
|
|
Community meeting of 10/10 minutes are updated
Hi all,
The meeting minutes of 10/10 community meeting is ready, please checkhttps://github.com/goharbor/community/blob/master/MEETING_SCHEDULE.md. Meanwhile, the meeting schedule is also
Hi all,
The meeting minutes of 10/10 community meeting is ready, please checkhttps://github.com/goharbor/community/blob/master/MEETING_SCHEDULE.md. Meanwhile, the meeting schedule is also
|
By
Steven Zou <sz...@...>
·
#43
·
|
|
Re: About restful APIs for job services
@Herman Zhu
Now the job service document is available athttps://github.com/goharbor/harbor/tree/master/src/jobservice please check. Thanks!
thanks®ards
--
Steven (邹佳)
Engineer,
@Herman Zhu
Now the job service document is available athttps://github.com/goharbor/harbor/tree/master/src/jobservice please check. Thanks!
thanks®ards
--
Steven (邹佳)
Engineer,
|
By
Steven Zou <sz...@...>
·
#80
·
|
|
Re: harbor performance testing result & tool
What’s perf testing env? Is it possible limited by the io/network resource limitations?
thanks®ards
--
Steven (邹佳)
Engineer, CNA, VMware R&D
Mail: sz...@...
Cell:
What’s perf testing env? Is it possible limited by the io/network resource limitations?
thanks®ards
--
Steven (邹佳)
Engineer, CNA, VMware R&D
Mail: sz...@...
Cell:
|
By
Steven Zou <sz...@...>
·
#64
·
|
|
Re: harbor performance testing result & tool
our team has done some bench mark. however, we found the several threads run in parallel has no benefit during docker push scenario. Is it normal? Do you know what factor blocks the performance
our team has done some bench mark. however, we found the several threads run in parallel has no benefit during docker push scenario. Is it normal? Do you know what factor blocks the performance
|
By
Zhenhua Dong <dongz...@...>
·
#63
·
|
|
Re: Not able to add LDAP Groups
The LDAP group is different with email group, you can not use email group here.
First you need to confirm that the requirement is meet:
The LDAP group is different with email group, you can not use email group here.
First you need to confirm that the requirement is meet:
|
By
DaoJun Zhang <dao...@...>
·
#1
·
|