Date
21 - 40 of 53
[VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
|
derek@...
+1 (non-binding)
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
hmcgonigal@...
+1 non-binding
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Maggie Zhou
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
jon@...
+1 non binding
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Ashudeep Sharma
+1 (non-binding)
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Camille Fournier
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
+1 non-binding
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Michael Pawliszyn
+1 (non-binding)
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
"Nathan Xu <nathan_xu@...>
+1 non-binding ------------------ Nathan Xu Shenzhen Wise2c technology Co.,ltd ------------------ Original ------------------ Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2018 00:50 AM To: "cncf-toc"<cncf-toc@...>; Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation) The TOC has decided to invite Vitess (https://github.com/youtube/vitess) as an INCUBATION level CNCF project, sponsored by Brian Grant from the TOC.
Vitess is a MySQL-compatible data orchestrator/platform. It orchestrates management of MySQL instances and has been serving all YouTube database traffic since 2011. Vitess has grown to encompass tens of thousands of MySQL nodes. It is also used by companies such as HubSpot, Slack and Square. The full project proposal is located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/67 Please vote (+1/0/-1) on this thread... remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Brian Grant
Trying again: On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Brian Grant <briangrant@...> wrote:
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Chakri Nelluri
+1 non-binding
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
whereshallyoube@...
+1 non-binding
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
shlomi.noach@...
+1 (non-binding)
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
- Bryan On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@linuxfoundation.
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Camille Fournier
I'm confused, is hubspot using or evaluating this product? The different slide decks seem to disagree. On Jan 25, 2018 12:50 PM, "Chris Aniszczyk" <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Sugu Sougoumarane
Just got this confirmation from Hubspot: "Definitely using. Two dedicated full timers working on bringing it to prod. Three others supporting part time, plus me. We have a handful of prod clusters at this point and are starting wider scale rollout soon." It's likely that the slides were prepared at different times, because they were on staging for a while. On 29 January 2018 at 17:36, Camille Fournier <skamille@...> wrote:
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Camille Fournier
But it is not yet in prod? Bringing it to prod sounds like not. On Jan 29, 2018 9:51 PM, "Sugu Sougoumarane" <ssougou@...> wrote:
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Camille Fournier
Basically, I'm concerned that there are not really actual production users who also are project committers that aren't YouTube/Google. On Jan 29, 2018 9:53 PM, "Camille Fournier" <skamille@...> wrote:
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Quinton Hoole
I share Camille’s concern.
Note that the only explicit requirement in this regard w.r.t. Incubation level is as follows (from https://www.cncf.io/projects/graduation-criteria/):
The proposal says this about adopters:
This is an alphabetical list of known adopters of Vitess. Some have already gone into production, and others are at various stages of testing. Can we perhaps get some clarification about which are in
production, and which are still in testing.
Sorry, this should have been brought up in the due diligence, but
unfortunately got missed, by the looks of things.
Q
Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell: 408-320-8917 Office # E2-9 Email: quinton.hoole@... ID#Q00403160
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Camille Fournier <skamille@...>
Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...> Date: Monday, January 29, 2018 at 17:54 To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...> Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Sugu Sougoumarane
Ah, I should have made this explicit in our slides, but here is the information to address your concerns about the graduation criteria: The following eight companies have vitess serving production traffic:
Of these, engineers from the following companies have made significant contributions to the vitess code base:
Additionally, the following companies have started making contributions, while in the process of evaluating:
There are also other companies listed in the adopters page. They are evaluating vitess with the intent to mainly use it. Finally, there are other companies, who are involved with Vitess at various levels, that wish to remain anonymous. So, we haven’t listed them here. Please let me know if this answers your questions, or if you have others. On 29 January 2018 at 18:08, Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> wrote:
|
|||||
|
|
