Date
1 - 19 of 19
[VOTE] OpenMetrics for Incubation
Amye Scavarda Perrin
OpenMetrics has applied to move from Sandbox to Incubation.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/615
Due Diligence (DD) doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BN6ABvfbAMhJthH6xNOY5Lmls3jeE3kFbMgF04BzEKE/edit#heading=h.jidcx4f4xk02
Alena Prokharchyk has called for public comment (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5913) and has approved a call for a public vote.
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.
Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
--
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/615
Due Diligence (DD) doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BN6ABvfbAMhJthH6xNOY5Lmls3jeE3kFbMgF04BzEKE/edit#heading=h.jidcx4f4xk02
Alena Prokharchyk has called for public comment (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5913) and has approved a call for a public vote.
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.
Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
Alena Prokharchyk
+1 binding
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-alena
On Jul 7, 2021, at 12:01 PM, Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:OpenMetrics has applied to move from Sandbox to Incubation.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/615
Due Diligence (DD) doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BN6ABvfbAMhJthH6xNOY5Lmls3jeE3kFbMgF04BzEKE/edit#heading=h.jidcx4f4xk02
Alena Prokharchyk has called for public comment (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5913) and has approved a call for a public vote.
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.
Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!--Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
Mark Carter
I am supportive of Openmetrics, but would like to raise a concern.
I am hearing more and more customers who are confused with how Opentelemetry metrics and Openmetrics relate to each other and which one they should be implementing.
I am concerned that without a plan for CNCF to collapse Openmetrics and Opentelemetry metrics specs to a single spec we may end up in a similar situation to when we had Opentracing and Opencensus as parallel projects which each had a slightly different view on tracing.
Would be great to have guidance to customers on what is CNCF view on the relationship between the two and whether they should or should not merge and why.
Would love to understand how others in the community and TOC view this as I may not have the full picture.
Thank you for your insights,
Mark
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 1:22 PM Alena Prokharchyk via lists.cncf.io <aprokharchyk=apple.com@...> wrote:
+1 binding-alenaOn Jul 7, 2021, at 12:01 PM, Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:OpenMetrics has applied to move from Sandbox to Incubation.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/615
Due Diligence (DD) doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BN6ABvfbAMhJthH6xNOY5Lmls3jeE3kFbMgF04BzEKE/edit#heading=h.jidcx4f4xk02
Alena Prokharchyk has called for public comment (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5913) and has approved a call for a public vote.
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.
Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!--Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
Alena Prokharchyk
Hi Mark,
Thank you for raising this question. There are no plans to merge OpenTelemetry and OpenMetrics. There is an effort by OpenTelemetry on adding OpenMetrics support to the collector. Together with the Prometheus and OpenMetrics community, the workgroup was formed, with weekly meetings that move this work forward. Many non-trivial challenges are being discussed and worked on, which brings benefits to all communities. More information and meetings notes can be found here https://github.com/open-telemetry/wg-prometheus, everybody is welcome to participate and ask questions.
-alena
On Jul 7, 2021, at 2:11 PM, Mark Carter <markcartertm@...> wrote:I am supportive of Openmetrics, but would like to raise a concern.I am hearing more and more customers who are confused with how Opentelemetry metrics and Openmetrics relate to each other and which one they should be implementing.I am concerned that without a plan for CNCF to collapse Openmetrics and Opentelemetry metrics specs to a single spec we may end up in a similar situation to when we had Opentracing and Opencensus as parallel projects which each had a slightly different view on tracing.Would be great to have guidance to customers on what is CNCF view on the relationship between the two and whether they should or should not merge and why.Would love to understand how others in the community and TOC view this as I may not have the full picture.Thank you for your insights,MarkOn Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 1:22 PM Alena Prokharchyk via lists.cncf.io <aprokharchyk=apple.com@...> wrote:+1 binding-alenaOn Jul 7, 2021, at 12:01 PM, Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:OpenMetrics has applied to move from Sandbox to Incubation.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/615
Due Diligence (DD) doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BN6ABvfbAMhJthH6xNOY5Lmls3jeE3kFbMgF04BzEKE/edit#heading=h.jidcx4f4xk02
Alena Prokharchyk has called for public comment (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5913) and has approved a call for a public vote.
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.
Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!--Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
+1 non-binding!
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 7:05 PM Alena Prokharchyk via lists.cncf.io <aprokharchyk=apple.com@...> wrote:
Hi Mark,Thank you for raising this question. There are no plans to merge OpenTelemetry and OpenMetrics. There is an effort by OpenTelemetry on adding OpenMetrics support to the collector. Together with the Prometheus and OpenMetrics community, the workgroup was formed, with weekly meetings that move this work forward. Many non-trivial challenges are being discussed and worked on, which brings benefits to all communities. More information and meetings notes can be found here https://github.com/open-telemetry/wg-prometheus, everybody is welcome to participate and ask questions.-alenaOn Jul 7, 2021, at 2:11 PM, Mark Carter <markcartertm@...> wrote:I am supportive of Openmetrics, but would like to raise a concern.I am hearing more and more customers who are confused with how Opentelemetry metrics and Openmetrics relate to each other and which one they should be implementing.I am concerned that without a plan for CNCF to collapse Openmetrics and Opentelemetry metrics specs to a single spec we may end up in a similar situation to when we had Opentracing and Opencensus as parallel projects which each had a slightly different view on tracing.Would be great to have guidance to customers on what is CNCF view on the relationship between the two and whether they should or should not merge and why.Would love to understand how others in the community and TOC view this as I may not have the full picture.Thank you for your insights,MarkOn Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 1:22 PM Alena Prokharchyk via lists.cncf.io <aprokharchyk=apple.com@...> wrote:+1 binding-alenaOn Jul 7, 2021, at 12:01 PM, Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:OpenMetrics has applied to move from Sandbox to Incubation.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/615
Due Diligence (DD) doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BN6ABvfbAMhJthH6xNOY5Lmls3jeE3kFbMgF04BzEKE/edit#heading=h.jidcx4f4xk02
Alena Prokharchyk has called for public comment (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5913) and has approved a call for a public vote.
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.
Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!--Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
Eduardo Silva
+1 non-binding!
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 at 04:14, Rob Skillington <rob@...> wrote:
+1 non-binding!On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 7:05 PM Alena Prokharchyk via lists.cncf.io <aprokharchyk=apple.com@...> wrote:Hi Mark,Thank you for raising this question. There are no plans to merge OpenTelemetry and OpenMetrics. There is an effort by OpenTelemetry on adding OpenMetrics support to the collector. Together with the Prometheus and OpenMetrics community, the workgroup was formed, with weekly meetings that move this work forward. Many non-trivial challenges are being discussed and worked on, which brings benefits to all communities. More information and meetings notes can be found here https://github.com/open-telemetry/wg-prometheus, everybody is welcome to participate and ask questions.-alenaOn Jul 7, 2021, at 2:11 PM, Mark Carter <markcartertm@...> wrote:I am supportive of Openmetrics, but would like to raise a concern.I am hearing more and more customers who are confused with how Opentelemetry metrics and Openmetrics relate to each other and which one they should be implementing.I am concerned that without a plan for CNCF to collapse Openmetrics and Opentelemetry metrics specs to a single spec we may end up in a similar situation to when we had Opentracing and Opencensus as parallel projects which each had a slightly different view on tracing.Would be great to have guidance to customers on what is CNCF view on the relationship between the two and whether they should or should not merge and why.Would love to understand how others in the community and TOC view this as I may not have the full picture.Thank you for your insights,MarkOn Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 1:22 PM Alena Prokharchyk via lists.cncf.io <aprokharchyk=apple.com@...> wrote:+1 binding-alenaOn Jul 7, 2021, at 12:01 PM, Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:OpenMetrics has applied to move from Sandbox to Incubation.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/615
Due Diligence (DD) doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BN6ABvfbAMhJthH6xNOY5Lmls3jeE3kFbMgF04BzEKE/edit#heading=h.jidcx4f4xk02
Alena Prokharchyk has called for public comment (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5913) and has approved a call for a public vote.
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.
Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!--Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
--
Cornelia Davis
+1 binding
+1 non-binding
--
Cornelia Davis
CTO, Weaveworks
@cdavisafc
+1 805 452 8941
alexis richardson
+1 nb
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 3:12 PM Cornelia Davis <cornelia@...> wrote:
+1 binding+1 non-binding--Cornelia DavisCTO, Weaveworks@cdavisafc+1 805 452 8941
+1 NB
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:16 PM alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
+1 nbOn Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 3:12 PM Cornelia Davis <cornelia@...> wrote:+1 binding+1 non-binding--Cornelia DavisCTO, Weaveworks@cdavisafc+1 805 452 8941
Paul Buck
+1 (non binding)
VP, Community Development | Eclipse Foundation | +1.613.220.6507 (m)
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:46 AM Queeny Jin <jinkun@...> wrote:
+1 NBOn Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:16 PM alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:+1 nbOn Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 3:12 PM Cornelia Davis <cornelia@...> wrote:+1 binding+1 non-binding--Cornelia DavisCTO, Weaveworks@cdavisafc+1 805 452 8941
+1 binding
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 4:53 PM Paul Buck <paul.buck@...> wrote:
+1 (non binding)Paul BuckVP, Community Development | Eclipse Foundation | +1.613.220.6507 (m)On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:46 AM Queeny Jin <jinkun@...> wrote:+1 NBOn Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:16 PM alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:+1 nbOn Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 3:12 PM Cornelia Davis <cornelia@...> wrote:+1 binding+1 non-binding--Cornelia DavisCTO, Weaveworks@cdavisafc+1 805 452 8941
--
~Dave
Liz Rice
+1 binding
FWIW I also shared the concern raised by Mark about the potential for confusion between OpenTelemetry and OpenMetrics, but I'm very encouraged that this is being addressed by the working group as described by Alena. It would be great to see compatibility here!
There is an effort by OpenTelemetry on adding OpenMetrics support to the collector. Together with the Prometheus and OpenMetrics community, the workgroup was formed, with weekly meetings that move this work forward. Many non-trivial challenges are being discussed and worked on, which brings benefits to all communities. More information and meetings notes can be found here https://github.com/open-telemetry/wg-prometheus, everybody is welcome to participate and ask questions.
+1 bindingOn Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 4:53 PM Paul Buck <paul.buck@...> wrote:+1 (non binding)Paul BuckVP, Community Development | Eclipse Foundation | +1.613.220.6507 (m)On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:46 AM Queeny Jin <jinkun@...> wrote:+1 NBOn Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:16 PM alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:+1 nbOn Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 3:12 PM Cornelia Davis <cornelia@...> wrote:+1 binding+1 non-binding--Cornelia DavisCTO, Weaveworks@cdavisafc+1 805 452 8941--~Dave
+1 Binding. thanks Alena for shining the light on the working group.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 5:33 AM Liz Rice <liz@...> wrote:
+1 bindingFWIW I also shared the concern raised by Mark about the potential for confusion between OpenTelemetry and OpenMetrics, but I'm very encouraged that this is being addressed by the working group as described by Alena. It would be great to see compatibility here!There is an effort by OpenTelemetry on adding OpenMetrics support to the collector. Together with the Prometheus and OpenMetrics community, the workgroup was formed, with weekly meetings that move this work forward. Many non-trivial challenges are being discussed and worked on, which brings benefits to all communities. More information and meetings notes can be found here https://github.com/open-telemetry/wg-prometheus, everybody is welcome to participate and ask questions.+1 bindingOn Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 4:53 PM Paul Buck <paul.buck@...> wrote:+1 (non binding)Paul BuckVP, Community Development | Eclipse Foundation | +1.613.220.6507 (m)On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:46 AM Queeny Jin <jinkun@...> wrote:+1 NBOn Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:16 PM alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:+1 nbOn Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 3:12 PM Cornelia Davis <cornelia@...> wrote:+1 binding+1 non-binding--Cornelia DavisCTO, Weaveworks@cdavisafc+1 805 452 8941--~Dave
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
Justin Cormack
+1 binding
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 8:01 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
OpenMetrics has applied to move from Sandbox to Incubation.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/615
Due Diligence (DD) doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BN6ABvfbAMhJthH6xNOY5Lmls3jeE3kFbMgF04BzEKE/edit#heading=h.jidcx4f4xk02
Alena Prokharchyk has called for public comment (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5913) and has approved a call for a public vote.
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.
Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!--Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
Sheng Liang <sheng.liang@...>
+1 binding
From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...>
On Behalf Of Amye Scavarda Perrin via lists.cncf.io
Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 12:01 PM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] OpenMetrics for Incubation
Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 12:01 PM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] OpenMetrics for Incubation
OpenMetrics has applied to move from Sandbox to Incubation.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/615
Due Diligence (DD) doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BN6ABvfbAMhJthH6xNOY5Lmls3jeE3kFbMgF04BzEKE/edit#heading=h.jidcx4f4xk02
Alena Prokharchyk has called for public comment (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5913) and has approved a call for a public vote.
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.
Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
Lei Zhang
+1 binding
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 12:02 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
OpenMetrics has applied to move from Sandbox to Incubation.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/615
Due Diligence (DD) doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BN6ABvfbAMhJthH6xNOY5Lmls3jeE3kFbMgF04BzEKE/edit#heading=h.jidcx4f4xk02
Alena Prokharchyk has called for public comment (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5913) and has approved a call for a public vote.
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.
Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!--Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...