Date
1 - 20 of 34
[VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
|
The linkerd team has requested a move to the incubation level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/86 You can see the project statistics here: https://linkerd.devstats.cncf.io/ and the linkerd project believes they meet the incubation criteria requirements: - Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd/blob/master/ADOPTERS.md - Have a healthy number of committers: https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd/blob/master/MAINTAINERS.md - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd/releases and https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd/graphs/contributors Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/86 Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|
|
|
Quinton Hoole
+1 (non binding)
Impressive production adoption!
I notice that 95%+ of code is contributed by current Buoyant employees. Any plans to diversify that in the future? To be clear, this is not a pre-requisite for incubation.
Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell: 408-320-8917 Office # E2-9 Email: quinton.hoole@... ID#Q00403160
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Thursday, March 15, 2018 at 10:28 To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
|
|
|
|
JJ
+1 (non binding) On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
drbarker@...
+1 (non-binding)
Dan Barker Chief Architect National Association of Insurance Commissioners 1100 Walnut St. Suite 1500 Kansas City, MO 64106 816-783-8669
From: cncf-toc@... [mailto:cncf-toc@...]
On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 12:28 PM To: cncf-toc@... Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
The linkerd team has requested a move to the incubation level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/86
You can see the project statistics here:
https://linkerd.devstats.cncf.io/ and the linkerd project believes they meet the incubation criteria requirements: - Have a healthy number of committers:
https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd/blob/master/MAINTAINERS.md Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 ----------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any attachments are from the NAIC and are intended only for the addressee. Information contained herein is confidential, and may be privileged or exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable federal or state law. This message is not intended as a waiver of the confidential, privileged or exempted status of the information transmitted. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or by forwarding it to the NAIC Service Desk at help@.... |
|
|
|
William Morgan
Thanks! And those are just the public ones. :) Re: code percentages. This is a side-effect of where the project started, but we definitely want to diversify and I expect that it will happen naturally over time. E.g. we've had a couple non-Buoyant folks who have done major bits of work over the past year (and we've been expanding the maintainers list to reflect that). -William On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Joseph Jacks <jacks.joe@...>
+1 (non-binding)
|
|
|
|
vongosling
+1 (non binding) Also have a the same question, any plans to diversify that in the future ? I am glad to integrate linkerd with Apache RocketMQ 5.0 deeply :-) Best Regards, Von Gosling, Apache RocketMQ Co-founder, Linux OpenMessaging Founder
|
|
|
|
Brandon Dimcheff <brandon@...>
+1 non-binding On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:46 PM vongosling <fengjia10@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...>
-1 non-binding I think linkerd does a great job helping applications gain resilience from the network proxy and it has done an amazing 🙌 job and educating users and gaining production usage. I don't see linkerd as a product having as much traction going forward and have a hard time seeing more development diversity going forward. The resource requirements of it and the pattern of a hostcentric proxy have trade-offs that I don't think reinforce the other patterns and products the CNCF has promoted as cloud native. |
|
|
|
0 non-binding On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 21:02 Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...> wrote:
--
|
|
|
|
Ruben Orduz <ruben@...>
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:07 AM, Chris Short via Lists.Cncf.Io <chris=chrisshort.net@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Dan Richelson
+1 (non-binding) Linkerd is legit with a great core team and supporting community! |
|
|
|
Zack Angelo <zack.angelo@...>
+1 (non-binding)
|
|
|
|
g.khomeriki@...
+1 (non binding) Linkerd provides a mature and production-ready implementation of a service mesh. There are several areas where its architecture has considerable benefits over currently available alternatives. For example, linkerd's plugin-based architecture provides extensibility of the data plane that allows for much more customized integrations into pre-existing architectures compared to alternatives that allow customization via remote API contracts. Although the JVM overhead is a downside, there are many use-cases where linkerd is a great fit. |
|
|
|
alexis richardson
thank-you for the detailed summary, George!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 8:22 PM, Georgi Khomeriki <g.khomeriki@...> wrote:
+1 (non binding) |
|
|
|
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Nikolay Pshenichnyy
+1 (non-binding)
Linkerd is an excellent service mesh proxy! |
|
|
|
Richard Hartmann
+1 non-binding
|
|
|
|
Ben Hoyt
+1 (non-binding) |
|
|
|
cncf.io@...
+1 (non-binding)
|
|
|
