1. Cncf-Toc
  2. Topics

Request for Comment: Clarifying End-User, Adopter, Vendor

Emily Fox
 

Community,
  In an effort to provide projects, the community, and the TOC with less ambiguity around who are project "adopters," the TOC explored past Due Diligence activities as well the continuing growth of projects and the market built around or with them. The need for this clarity is captured on issue #788.


 REQUEST:  We invite you to comment on PR #864 which introduces categories of adopters, examples, and more context around the use of adopters for Due Diligence and considerations. This PR will follow our usual two-week comment period, closing at end of day Pacific Time on July 12th 2022.

Thank you!

Links included in this email:
Original Issue: https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/788
Corresponding PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/864 

~Emily Fox, TOC
GH: @TheFoxAtWork, T: @TheMoxieFox
Bill Mulligan <bill.mulligan@...>
 

Thank you for adding this, it is very helpful! I've been asked all of these questions in the past and now I can have a clear doc to point to :) 


On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 2:57 PM Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@...> wrote:

Community,
  In an effort to provide projects, the community, and the TOC with less ambiguity around who are project "adopters," the TOC explored past Due Diligence activities as well the continuing growth of projects and the market built around or with them. The need for this clarity is captured on issue #788.


 REQUEST:  We invite you to comment on PR #864 which introduces categories of adopters, examples, and more context around the use of adopters for Due Diligence and considerations. This PR will follow our usual two-week comment period, closing at end of day Pacific Time on July 12th 2022.

Thank you!

Links included in this email:
Original Issue: https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/788
Corresponding PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/864 

~Emily Fox, TOC
GH: @TheFoxAtWork, T: @TheMoxieFox

1 - 2 of 2