1. Cncf-Toc
  2. Topics

New mission for "TOC Contributors"

Davanum Srinivas
 

Hi Folks,

Once upon a time, before we had a good governance structure in TOC (like TAG(s) and WG(s)) we had "TOC Contributors" - a list of folks who can and did help with TOC business.

Now it feels like we should redirect all our energies to TAG(s) and WG(s) to strengthen them and help the TOC by the good work in these spaces. We are figuring out how/what in the following github issue:

As the cleanup phase of this effort, we have drafted PR(s) https://github.com/cncf/people/pull/89 and https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/885 as well.

Thoughts please. Either here in this thread or in issue 867 or #toc on slack.

thanks,
Dims

--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
alexis richardson
 

As an OG member, let me say that the "TOC Contributors" concept was an
interim one, that can be deprecated for TAGs and WGs. So I am +1 on
shifting focus onto the latter (TAG/WG) and dropping the former
(TOC/C)

alexis

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 4:49 PM Davanum Srinivas <davanum@...> wrote:

Hi Folks,

Once upon a time, before we had a good governance structure in TOC (like TAG(s) and WG(s)) we had "TOC Contributors" - a list of folks who can and did help with TOC business.

Now it feels like we should redirect all our energies to TAG(s) and WG(s) to strengthen them and help the TOC by the good work in these spaces. We are figuring out how/what in the following github issue:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/867

As the cleanup phase of this effort, we have drafted PR(s) https://github.com/cncf/people/pull/89 and https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/885 as well.

Thoughts please. Either here in this thread or in issue 867 or #toc on slack.

thanks,
Dims

--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
Lin Sun
 

+1 on this, it was unclear to me what TOC contributors exactly are when viewing the docs earlier today.

Best,

Lin

On Jul 27, 2022, at 11:49 AM, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@...> wrote:

Hi Folks,

Once upon a time, before we had a good governance structure in TOC (like TAG(s) and WG(s)) we had "TOC Contributors" - a list of folks who can and did help with TOC business.

Now it feels like we should redirect all our energies to TAG(s) and WG(s) to strengthen them and help the TOC by the good work in these spaces. We are figuring out how/what in the following github issue:

As the cleanup phase of this effort, we have drafted PR(s) https://github.com/cncf/people/pull/89 and https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/885 as well.

Thoughts please. Either here in this thread or in issue 867 or #toc on slack.

thanks,
Dims

--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

1 - 3 of 3