Call For VOTE -- Graduation criteria
alexis richardson
Hi all I'm calling for a vote on this. Please scrutinise the Inception criteria with special care. alexis On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 5:02 AM Dan Kohn via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Kenneth Owens (kenowens) <kenowens@...>
+1
From: cncf-toc-bounces@... [mailto:cncf-toc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 4:08 PM To: cncf-toc@... Subject: [cncf-toc] Call For VOTE -- Graduation criteria
Hi all
I'm calling for a vote on this. Please scrutinise the Inception criteria with special care.
alexis
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 5:02 AM Dan Kohn via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
alexis richardson
+1 from me too On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:57 PM Kenneth Owens (kenowens) via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Benjamin Hindman
+1 from me! On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
--
Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Solomon Hykes <solomon.hykes@...>
+1
I will add that there is a risk of confusion between "inception projects" and "incubated projects", so CNCF should take special care to clearly advertise the difference. As long as that is done, I am comfortable with this. On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote: Hi all |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
alexis richardson
Thank you On Mon, 5 Dec 2016, 16:57 Solomon Hykes, <solomon.hykes@...> wrote: +1 |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Brian Grant
YES/+1 Note that a single file of committers is too simplistic for large projects, but that's not required by the criteria, so I don't see it as a blocker. On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
alexis richardson
Thank you Please could you repost to public toc list? On Mon, 5 Dec 2016, 17:03 Brian Grant, <briangrant@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
+1 -- and like others, glad that there are guidelines that give the TOC some flexibility. - Bryan On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Camille Fournier
+1 looks good! C On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Bryan Cantrill via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...>
+1 On 29 November 2016 at 14:08, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
alexis richardson
I believe we have 8 votes in favour, which I'll take as carried.
Note: one TOC member (SH) asked that we "take special care to clearly advertise the difference" between "inception projects" and "incubated projects". Thank-you. On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...> wrote: +1 |
|||||||||||
|