Date
1 - 16 of 16
[VOTE] Proposal for streamlined graduation process
|
Saad Ali
+1 binding On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 4:10 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote: This proposal changes the graduation process to a template for |
|
|
|
Justin Cormack
+1 binding On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:10 AM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote: This proposal changes the graduation process to a template for |
|
|
|
Ricardo Rocha
+1 binding
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 16/07/2021 01:10 Amye Scavarda Perrin via lists.cncf.io <ascavarda=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote: |
|
|
|
Liz Rice
+1 binding On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:08 PM Lei Zhang <resouer@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Lei Zhang
+1 binding On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 4:10 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote: This proposal changes the graduation process to a template for |
|
|
|
Nick Young
+1 non-binding. On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 04:36, Brandon Lum <lumjjb@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Brandon Lum
+1 nb On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 12:45 PM Kiran Mova <kiran.mova@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Kiran Mova
+1 non-binding +1 binding |
|
|
|
Sheng Liang <sheng.liang@...>
+1 binding
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> On Behalf Of Amye Scavarda Perrin via lists.cncf.io Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 4:10 PM To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Proposal for streamlined graduation process This proposal changes the graduation process to a template for projects to submit and get feedback on before moving to a vote. (https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/671) Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread. Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! -- Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@... |
|
|
|
Alena Prokharchyk
+1 binding
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-alena On Jul 15, 2021, at 4:10 PM, Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote: |
|
|
|
+1 binding On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 6:50 AM Davanum Srinivas <davanum@...> wrote:
--
~Dave |
|
|
|
Mark Carter
Great update. Two thoughts:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
1. I believe the word “is” is repeated unnecessarily in “why is the project is ready to graduate?” 2. Shouldn’t we aim to require that graduating projects will have more then one stakeholder by asking that at least two organizations will be represented as maintainers, governance board members and project TC members? Feedback appreciated, Mark Sent from my mobile phone On Jul 24, 2021, at 4:12 AM, Richard Hartmann <richih@...> wrote:
Left one nit inline and think it should be expanded even more, but it's definitely a large step in the right direction. As such, +1 NB. |
|
|
|
Richard Hartmann
Left one nit inline and think it should be expanded even more, but
it's definitely a large step in the right direction. As such, +1 NB. |
|
|
|
+1 non-binding On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 7:10 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote: This proposal changes the graduation process to a template for --
|
|
|
|
+1 Binding On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 7:10 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote: This proposal changes the graduation process to a template for --
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims |
|
|
|
Amye Scavarda Perrin
This proposal changes the graduation process to a template for
projects to submit and get feedback on before moving to a vote. (https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/671) Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread. Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! -- Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@... |
|
|