Date
1 - 8 of 8
openmetrics next steps
|
Richard Hartmann
Lee,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
it's every 14 days, Tuesday 1900 CEST; not sure if we will follow summer/winter or UTC once we get there. You will get an invite to the address you sent from. If you could send a short bio or something, that would be helpful. Long-term, we will document the people involved on https://github.com/RichiH/OpenMetrics along with everything else, I suspect. Reading through the files and issues in that repo will get you up to speed. RIchard
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Lee Calcote <leecalcote@...> wrote:
Richard,
|
|
|
|
Lee Calcote
Richard,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I wasn’t aware of the call on 7/18 (and missed it). When is the next call scheduled for? - Lee
On Jul 19, 2017, at 5:26 AM, Richard Hartmann <richih@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Richard Hartmann
Yes, carefully increasing participation is good. At the current stage,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I wouldn't want to be an artificial blocker in selection as I don't know most people (yet), anyway. "Does this person have relevant knowledge/experience and will they contribute positively" is the only hard consideration at this point. We are currently seeing some bikeshedding and feature creep; while that's always expected, overloading discussions is my main concern, atm. The Google people are networking and stackdriver with some Borgmon/Monarch experience mixed in; Fabian said he will toss the repo address and purpose into his k8s sig, but I didn't follow up on that and/or verify, yet. I shall do so, but Fabian's on holiday atm. Given the holiday season, these issues will collect and simmer for at least a few weeks before I will make a call for Rough Consensus. Richard
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
+stuart+brian fyi
|
|
|
|
alexis richardson
+stuart+brian fyi Richard IMO this planning process would benefit from *slightly* wider CNCF-TOC involvement. Do you want to select & invite people or ask Ken & Lee to do so? BTW, are the google reps in your notes also from the k8s instrumentation sig? a
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Richard Hartmann <richih@...> wrote: Hi Chris,
|
|
|
|
Richard Hartmann
Hi Chris,
sorry for being so late in replying. We didn't have the July 4th call for obvious reasons, but we had our call just now; even if quite a few people are on holiday. The GDoc is still https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q7HSZyRv4Ay4hTlva4uy8WPh5WlYv9S0Yy-xQS2vKo4/edit# but I am splitting out most questions into https://github.com/RichiH/OpenMetrics/issues so we have better exposure and tracking for those questions. Again, if you want to bounce these discussion to carefully hand-chosen people, you are more than welcome to do so. Part of my intention behind the issues is to get out of the echo chamber if whoever hapens to be in a particular call. Richard
|
|
|
|
Hey Richard, just following up here to see how things have progressed.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Richard Hartmann <richih@...> wrote: On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote: --
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
|
|
Richard Hartmann
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
Please talk to the GH project owner who has "openmetrics".Those requests are proxied by GH these days, but I will try. For help & next steps, you can follow up with Lee & Ken via email - ccd.Will do. You can find the Kubernetes Instrumentation SIG atFabian is listed as a lead and he's in on this effort as well. Still, I will make them officially aware. Richard
|
|
|
|
alexis richardson
Richard Thanks! Please talk to the GH project owner who has "openmetrics". For help & next steps, you can follow up with Lee & Ken via email - ccd. You can find the Kubernetes Instrumentation SIG at https://github.com/kubernetes/community/tree/master/sig-instrumentation a
|
|
|
