Agenda for TOC 4/5/17 Meeting
|
Here's the draft agenda for tomorrow: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1EbZEvW7zlXS7DhNnL2GkWN8H5P3uz5DvBSXMcE4sE7U/edit?usp=sharing If you would like to add a topic, please let me know. We'll do a small update from the WGs tomorrow on top of a quick retrospective of CNCon/KubeCon EU. Over the next few meetings, we will have full updates from the WGs, including recommendations on how to move forward within their respective domains. Thanks! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|
|
|
Mark Peek
Two things: 1. Can you add initial serverless WG discussion to the agenda? Might be good to gauge interest from the rest of the TOC even though Alexis will be out. 2. Next meeting is 4/19/2017. Will there be a f2f at dockercon?
Thanks, Mark
From:
<cncf-toc-bounces@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...>
Here's the draft agenda for tomorrow: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1EbZEvW7zlXS7DhNnL2GkWN8H5P3uz5DvBSXMcE4sE7U/edit?usp=sharing
If you would like to add a topic, please let me know. We'll do a small update from the WGs tomorrow on top of a quick retrospective of CNCon/KubeCon EU. Over the next few meetings, we will have full updates from the WGs, including recommendations on how to move forward within their respective domains.
Thanks!
-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|
|
|
alexis richardson
At CNcon last week, Jon and I joined the Prometheus dev crew for a chat about CNCF. One outcome was that Richard Hartmann is interested in creating a neutral write up of the data format that Prometheus uses for metrics. This could be called "OpenMetrics". --> possible discussion topic. On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:33 PM Mark Peek via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Richard Hartmann
Dear all,
is there any update from your side? I.e. is this something CNCF definitely wants and, if yes, how should we best proceed? From our side, there will be a technical hangout tonight @ 19:00 – 20:00 (CEST) which will include Prometheus, Google people from stackdriver, and Paul Dix to see if we can start with more than one project to increase reach. Monarch was also briefly mentioned, but I don't dare to hope to get good data and specs on that, yet. The results of this will be at https://docs.google.com/document/d/15cfrwzP_iOieFDr7WLfThNXKKbNKD60ER2sf_ybNPts/edit#heading=h.giywmrdmh8rd If any of you want to join, please let me know ASAP. Sorry for the very late notice, I was on holiday the last 2.5 weeks and am still tying up loose ends. Richard |
|
|
|
alexis richardson
I want this. On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:27 PM Richard Hartmann <richih@...> wrote: Dear all, |
|
|
|
Richard Hartmann
So that makes at least two of us.
Can I consider this the OK from CNCF? You have firm commitment from my side. Feel free to start whatever process on your side at any time. The only open question from my side would be the naming as "openmetrics" is relatively contested. I was thinking of one of the siblings of Prometheus, but a different one from the one you suggested back then. I will dig out my notes on that. Richard |
|
|
|
alexis richardson
prometheus' brother was epimetheus.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
epimetrics? prometrics? On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Richard Hartmann <richih@...> wrote:
So that makes at least two of us. |
|
|
|
Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...>
+1 On 6 June 2017 at 16:30, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
|
|
|