[VOTE] OpenTracing Project Proposal
OpenTracing Proposal
Name of project: OpenTracing
Description: A set of consistent, expressive, vendor-neutral APIs for distributed tracing and context propagation, seeslides for the content we presented to the CNCF TOC.
Sponsor / Advisor from TOC: Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
Unique Identifier: opentracing
License: Apache License v2.0
Source control repositories:
Initial Committers:
Ben Sigelman (@bensigelman)
Yuri Shkuro (@yurishkuro)
see the Contributors section for more information
Infrastructure requirements: CI and potentially CNCF Community Cluster access
Issue tracker: global - https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing.github.io/issues and per-platform issues are raised on the per-platform repository’s issues area
Mailing lists
Website: http://opentracing.io
Release methodology and mechanics: Various across platforms
Social media accounts: Twitter: @opentracing
Existing sponsorship: Nothing formal; LightStep occasionally spends small amounts of money (hosting events, etc) on behalf of OpenTracing tech talks and so forth.
External Dependencies
Really very little. The core OpenTracing libraries are facade APIs and thus only bring in dependencies that are needed to describe various function parameters and return values. In some cases there are test harnesses that bring in ubiquitous testing packages. OpenTracing is willing to go through and formally enumerate all of these dependencies, but suffice to say there’s nothing interesting to see and everything is permissively licensed.
Statement on alignment with CNCF mission:
OpenTracing is an open API standard for distributed tracing in applications and OSS packages. Developers with experience building microservices at scale understand the role and importance of distributed tracing: per-process logging and metric monitoring have their place, but neither can reconstruct the elaborate journeys that transactions take as they propagate across a distributed system. Distributed traces are these journeys.
So if distributed tracing is so valuable, why doesn’t everyone do it already? Because tracing instrumentation has been fragmented, syntactically inconsistent, and thus excessively expensive to deploy end-to-end across most cloud-native stacks.
Distributed tracing is challenging because the instrumentation must propagate the tracing context both within and between processes. Accomplishing this involves many distinct pieces in a (micro-)service stack. In particular, tracing context must be passed through:
Self-contained OSS services (e.g., NGINX, Cassandra, Redis, etc)
OSS packages linked into custom services (e.g., grpc, ORMs, etc)
Arbitrary application glue and business logic built around the above
And there’s the rub: It is not reasonable to ask all OSS services and all OSS packages and all application-specific code to use a single tracing vendor; yet, if they don’t share a mechanism for trace description and propagation, the causal chain is broken and the traces are truncated, often to the point of uselessness. We need a single, standard mechanism to describe the behavior of our systems. OpenTracing is that single, standard mechanism.
Regarding CNCF’s charter mission, OpenTracing is specifically concerned with making loosely-coupled [micro]services easier to manage. As such, it is strongly aligned with CNCF and its goal to “significantly increase the overall agility and maintainability of applications” by “[making] technology ubiquitous and easily available through reliable interfaces.” Indeed, OpenTracing and CNCF as a whole mutually benefit one another. (It should be noted that, as it is focused on standard instrumentation more than standard encoding formats, OpenTracing today is most relevant at the application layer; it has few specific opinions about — or strong dependencies on — the container layer or orchestration systems more generally, though service discovery and high-quality tracing are symbiotic.)
See also: the OpenTracing raison d’être on Medium
Other Contributors:
OpenTracing Semantics Repo (formally the opentracing.github.io docs repo)
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
Priyanka Sharma (pritianka) LightStep
Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache
Ivan Fraixedes (ifraixedes)
Github issue/discussion participation:
Rodrigo Fonseca (rfonseca) Brown University
Colin Patrick McCabe (cmccabe) Cloudera
Cagatay Kavukcuoglu (tinkerware) Base60Labs
Benjamin Eberlei (beberlei) Qafoo
Władysław Bodzek (wladekb)
Bogdan Drutu (bogdandrutu) Google
Grayson Koonce (breerly) Uber
Marcin Grzejszczak (marcingrzejszczak) Zipkin
Fabian Lange (CodingFabian) Instana
Paul Caporn (drpacman) BBC
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Tobias Schottdorf (tschottdorf) Cockroach Labs
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Brandon Gonzales (bg451) Student
Josh MacDonald (jmacd)
Bas van Beek (basvanbeek)
Stephen Gutekanst (slimsag) Sourcegraph
Richard Scothern (RichardScothern) Docker
Tamir Duberstein (tamird) Cockroach Labs
Kris Kowal (kriskowal) (I think Uber)
Aleksey (IncSW)
Kyle Conroy (kyleconroy) Stripe
Blake Mizerany (bmizerany) Life360
Sebastián Vera (sebastianvera)
Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
Alexander Sorokin (syrnick)
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Brandon Gonzales (bg451)
Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Adrian Cole (adriancole) Pivotal / Zipkin
Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache / Cassandra
Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Mohamed Ezzat (m-ezzat)
Christian Weiss (cwe1ss) Consultant
Daniel Wallin (dawallin) Frontwalker
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman)
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Josh MacDonald (jmacd) LightStep
Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc
<cncf-toc@...> wrote:
The OpenTracing (http://opentracing.io/) team has iterated on their project
proposal to a final one which is ready for voting by TOC members:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/15
So please vote! The proposal is also embedded below for your convenience:
OpenTracing Proposal
Name of project: OpenTracing
Description: A set of consistent, expressive, vendor-neutral APIs for
distributed tracing and context propagation, seeslides for the content we
presented to the CNCF TOC.
Sponsor / Advisor from TOC: Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
Unique Identifier: opentracing
License: Apache License v2.0
Source control repositories:
https://github.com/opentracing
https://github.com/opentracing-contrib
Initial Committers:
Ben Sigelman (@bensigelman)
Yuri Shkuro (@yurishkuro)
see the Contributors section for more information
Infrastructure requirements: CI and potentially CNCF Community Cluster
access
Issue tracker: global -
https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing.github.io/issues and per-platform
issues are raised on the per-platform repository’s issues area
Mailing lists
Active: https://gitter.im/opentracing/public
Placeholder: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/opentracing
Related: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/distributed-tracing
Website: http://opentracing.io
Release methodology and mechanics: Various across platforms
Social media accounts: Twitter: @opentracing
Existing sponsorship: Nothing formal; LightStep occasionally spends small
amounts of money (hosting events, etc) on behalf of OpenTracing tech talks
and so forth.
External Dependencies
Really very little. The core OpenTracing libraries are facade APIs and thus
only bring in dependencies that are needed to describe various function
parameters and return values. In some cases there are test harnesses that
bring in ubiquitous testing packages. OpenTracing is willing to go through
and formally enumerate all of these dependencies, but suffice to say there’s
nothing interesting to see and everything is permissively licensed.
Statement on alignment with CNCF mission:
OpenTracing is an open API standard for distributed tracing in applications
and OSS packages. Developers with experience building microservices at scale
understand the role and importance of distributed tracing: per-process
logging and metric monitoring have their place, but neither can reconstruct
the elaborate journeys that transactions take as they propagate across a
distributed system. Distributed traces are these journeys.
So if distributed tracing is so valuable, why doesn’t everyone do it
already? Because tracing instrumentation has been fragmented, syntactically
inconsistent, and thus excessively expensive to deploy end-to-end across
most cloud-native stacks.
Distributed tracing is challenging because the instrumentation must
propagate the tracing context both within and between processes.
Accomplishing this involves many distinct pieces in a (micro-)service stack.
In particular, tracing context must be passed through:
Self-contained OSS services (e.g., NGINX, Cassandra, Redis, etc)
OSS packages linked into custom services (e.g., grpc, ORMs, etc)
Arbitrary application glue and business logic built around the above
And there’s the rub: It is not reasonable to ask all OSS services and all
OSS packages and all application-specific code to use a single tracing
vendor; yet, if they don’t share a mechanism for trace description and
propagation, the causal chain is broken and the traces are truncated, often
to the point of uselessness. We need a single, standard mechanism to
describe the behavior of our systems. OpenTracing is that single, standard
mechanism.
Regarding CNCF’s charter mission, OpenTracing is specifically concerned with
making loosely-coupled [micro]services easier to manage. As such, it is
strongly aligned with CNCF and its goal to “significantly increase the
overall agility and maintainability of applications” by “[making] technology
ubiquitous and easily available through reliable interfaces.” Indeed,
OpenTracing and CNCF as a whole mutually benefit one another. (It should be
noted that, as it is focused on standard instrumentation more than standard
encoding formats, OpenTracing today is most relevant at the application
layer; it has few specific opinions about — or strong dependencies on — the
container layer or orchestration systems more generally, though service
discovery and high-quality tracing are symbiotic.)
See also: the OpenTracing raison d’être on Medium
Other Contributors:
OpenTracing Semantics Repo (formally the opentracing.github.io docs repo)
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
Priyanka Sharma (pritianka) LightStep
Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache
Ivan Fraixedes (ifraixedes)
Github issue/discussion participation:
Rodrigo Fonseca (rfonseca) Brown University
Colin Patrick McCabe (cmccabe) Cloudera
Cagatay Kavukcuoglu (tinkerware) Base60Labs
Benjamin Eberlei (beberlei) Qafoo
Władysław Bodzek (wladekb)
Bogdan Drutu (bogdandrutu) Google
Grayson Koonce (breerly) Uber
Marcin Grzejszczak (marcingrzejszczak) Zipkin
Fabian Lange (CodingFabian) Instana
Paul Caporn (drpacman) BBC
https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing-go
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Tobias Schottdorf (tschottdorf) Cockroach Labs
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Brandon Gonzales (bg451) Student
Josh MacDonald (jmacd)
Bas van Beek (basvanbeek)
Stephen Gutekanst (slimsag) Sourcegraph
Richard Scothern (RichardScothern) Docker
Tamir Duberstein (tamird) Cockroach Labs
Kris Kowal (kriskowal) (I think Uber)
Aleksey (IncSW)
Kyle Conroy (kyleconroy) Stripe
Blake Mizerany (bmizerany) Life360
Sebastián Vera (sebastianvera)
https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing-javascript
Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
Alexander Sorokin (syrnick)
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing-python
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Brandon Gonzales (bg451)
Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing-java
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Adrian Cole (adriancole) Pivotal / Zipkin
Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache / Cassandra
Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Mohamed Ezzat (m-ezzat)
https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing-csharp
Christian Weiss (cwe1ss) Consultant
Daniel Wallin (dawallin) Frontwalker
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman)
https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing-objc
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing-cpp
Josh MacDonald (jmacd) LightStep
Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc
<cncf-toc@...> wrote:
The OpenTracing (http://opentracing.io/) team has iterated on their project
proposal to a final one which is ready for voting by TOC members:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/15
So please vote! The proposal is also embedded below for your convenience:
OpenTracing Proposal
Name of project: OpenTracing
Description: A set of consistent, expressive, vendor-neutral APIs for
distributed tracing and context propagation, seeslides for the content we
presented to the CNCF TOC.
Sponsor / Advisor from TOC: Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
Unique Identifier: opentracing
License: Apache License v2.0
Source control repositories:
https://github.com/opentracing
https://github.com/opentracing-contrib
Initial Committers:
Ben Sigelman (@bensigelman)
Yuri Shkuro (@yurishkuro)
see the Contributors section for more information
Infrastructure requirements: CI and potentially CNCF Community Cluster
access
Issue tracker: global -
https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing.github.io/issues and per-platform
issues are raised on the per-platform repository’s issues area
Mailing lists
Active: https://gitter.im/opentracing/public
Placeholder: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/opentracing
Related: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/distributed-tracing
Website: http://opentracing.io
Release methodology and mechanics: Various across platforms
Social media accounts: Twitter: @opentracing
Existing sponsorship: Nothing formal; LightStep occasionally spends small
amounts of money (hosting events, etc) on behalf of OpenTracing tech talks
and so forth.
External Dependencies
Really very little. The core OpenTracing libraries are facade APIs and thus
only bring in dependencies that are needed to describe various function
parameters and return values. In some cases there are test harnesses that
bring in ubiquitous testing packages. OpenTracing is willing to go through
and formally enumerate all of these dependencies, but suffice to say there’s
nothing interesting to see and everything is permissively licensed.
Statement on alignment with CNCF mission:
OpenTracing is an open API standard for distributed tracing in applications
and OSS packages. Developers with experience building microservices at scale
understand the role and importance of distributed tracing: per-process
logging and metric monitoring have their place, but neither can reconstruct
the elaborate journeys that transactions take as they propagate across a
distributed system. Distributed traces are these journeys.
So if distributed tracing is so valuable, why doesn’t everyone do it
already? Because tracing instrumentation has been fragmented, syntactically
inconsistent, and thus excessively expensive to deploy end-to-end across
most cloud-native stacks.
Distributed tracing is challenging because the instrumentation must
propagate the tracing context both within and between processes.
Accomplishing this involves many distinct pieces in a (micro-)service stack.
In particular, tracing context must be passed through:
Self-contained OSS services (e.g., NGINX, Cassandra, Redis, etc)
OSS packages linked into custom services (e.g., grpc, ORMs, etc)
Arbitrary application glue and business logic built around the above
And there’s the rub: It is not reasonable to ask all OSS services and all
OSS packages and all application-specific code to use a single tracing
vendor; yet, if they don’t share a mechanism for trace description and
propagation, the causal chain is broken and the traces are truncated, often
to the point of uselessness. We need a single, standard mechanism to
describe the behavior of our systems. OpenTracing is that single, standard
mechanism.
Regarding CNCF’s charter mission, OpenTracing is specifically concerned with
making loosely-coupled [micro]services easier to manage. As such, it is
strongly aligned with CNCF and its goal to “significantly increase the
overall agility and maintainability of applications” by “[making] technology
ubiquitous and easily available through reliable interfaces.” Indeed,
OpenTracing and CNCF as a whole mutually benefit one another. (It should be
noted that, as it is focused on standard instrumentation more than standard
encoding formats, OpenTracing today is most relevant at the application
layer; it has few specific opinions about — or strong dependencies on — the
container layer or orchestration systems more generally, though service
discovery and high-quality tracing are symbiotic.)
See also: the OpenTracing raison d’être on Medium
Other Contributors:
OpenTracing Semantics Repo (formally the opentracing.github.io docs repo)
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
Priyanka Sharma (pritianka) LightStep
Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache
Ivan Fraixedes (ifraixedes)
Github issue/discussion participation:
Rodrigo Fonseca (rfonseca) Brown University
Colin Patrick McCabe (cmccabe) Cloudera
Cagatay Kavukcuoglu (tinkerware) Base60Labs
Benjamin Eberlei (beberlei) Qafoo
Władysław Bodzek (wladekb)
Bogdan Drutu (bogdandrutu) Google
Grayson Koonce (breerly) Uber
Marcin Grzejszczak (marcingrzejszczak) Zipkin
Fabian Lange (CodingFabian) Instana
Paul Caporn (drpacman) BBC
https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing-go
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Tobias Schottdorf (tschottdorf) Cockroach Labs
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Brandon Gonzales (bg451) Student
Josh MacDonald (jmacd)
Bas van Beek (basvanbeek)
Stephen Gutekanst (slimsag) Sourcegraph
Richard Scothern (RichardScothern) Docker
Tamir Duberstein (tamird) Cockroach Labs
Kris Kowal (kriskowal) (I think Uber)
Aleksey (IncSW)
Kyle Conroy (kyleconroy) Stripe
Blake Mizerany (bmizerany) Life360
Sebastián Vera (sebastianvera)
https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing-javascript
Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
Alexander Sorokin (syrnick)
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing-python
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Brandon Gonzales (bg451)
Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing-java
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Adrian Cole (adriancole) Pivotal / Zipkin
Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache / Cassandra
Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Mohamed Ezzat (m-ezzat)
https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing-csharp
Christian Weiss (cwe1ss) Consultant
Daniel Wallin (dawallin) Frontwalker
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman)
https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing-objc
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing-cpp
Josh MacDonald (jmacd) LightStep
Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc
The OpenTracing (http://opentracing.io/) team has iterated on their project proposal to a final one which is ready for voting by TOC members: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/15 So please vote! The proposal is also embedded below for your convenience:OpenTracing Proposal
Name of project: OpenTracing
Description: A set of consistent, expressive, vendor-neutral APIs for distributed tracing and context propagation, seeslides for the content we presented to the CNCF TOC.
Sponsor / Advisor from TOC: Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
Unique Identifier: opentracing
License: Apache License v2.0
Source control repositories:
Initial Committers:
Ben Sigelman (@bensigelman)
Yuri Shkuro (@yurishkuro)
see the Contributors section for more information
Infrastructure requirements: CI and potentially CNCF Community Cluster access
Issue tracker: global - https://github.com/
opentracing/opentracing. github.io/issues and per-platform issues are raised on the per-platform repository’s issues area Mailing lists
Website: http://opentracing.io
Release methodology and mechanics: Various across platforms
Social media accounts: Twitter: @opentracing
Existing sponsorship: Nothing formal; LightStep occasionally spends small amounts of money (hosting events, etc) on behalf of OpenTracing tech talks and so forth.
External Dependencies
Really very little. The core OpenTracing libraries are facade APIs and thus only bring in dependencies that are needed to describe various function parameters and return values. In some cases there are test harnesses that bring in ubiquitous testing packages. OpenTracing is willing to go through and formally enumerate all of these dependencies, but suffice to say there’s nothing interesting to see and everything is permissively licensed.
Statement on alignment with CNCF mission:
OpenTracing is an open API standard for distributed tracing in applications and OSS packages. Developers with experience building microservices at scale understand the role and importance of distributed tracing: per-process logging and metric monitoring have their place, but neither can reconstruct the elaborate journeys that transactions take as they propagate across a distributed system. Distributed traces are these journeys.
So if distributed tracing is so valuable, why doesn’t everyone do it already? Because tracing instrumentation has been fragmented, syntactically inconsistent, and thus excessively expensive to deploy end-to-end across most cloud-native stacks.
Distributed tracing is challenging because the instrumentation must propagate the tracing context both within and between processes. Accomplishing this involves many distinct pieces in a (micro-)service stack. In particular, tracing context must be passed through:
Self-contained OSS services (e.g., NGINX, Cassandra, Redis, etc)
OSS packages linked into custom services (e.g., grpc, ORMs, etc)
Arbitrary application glue and business logic built around the above
And there’s the rub: It is not reasonable to ask all OSS services and all OSS packages and all application-specific code to use a single tracing vendor; yet, if they don’t share a mechanism for trace description and propagation, the causal chain is broken and the traces are truncated, often to the point of uselessness. We need a single, standard mechanism to describe the behavior of our systems. OpenTracing is that single, standard mechanism.
Regarding CNCF’s charter mission, OpenTracing is specifically concerned with making loosely-coupled [micro]services easier to manage. As such, it is strongly aligned with CNCF and its goal to “significantly increase the overall agility and maintainability of applications” by “[making] technology ubiquitous and easily available through reliable interfaces.” Indeed, OpenTracing and CNCF as a whole mutually benefit one another. (It should be noted that, as it is focused on standard instrumentation more than standard encoding formats, OpenTracing today is most relevant at the application layer; it has few specific opinions about — or strong dependencies on — the container layer or orchestration systems more generally, though service discovery and high-quality tracing are symbiotic.)
See also: the OpenTracing raison d’être on Medium
Other Contributors:
OpenTracing Semantics Repo (formally the opentracing.github.io docs repo)
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
Priyanka Sharma (pritianka) LightStep
Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache
Ivan Fraixedes (ifraixedes)
Github issue/discussion participation:
Rodrigo Fonseca (rfonseca) Brown University
Colin Patrick McCabe (cmccabe) Cloudera
Cagatay Kavukcuoglu (tinkerware) Base60Labs
Benjamin Eberlei (beberlei) Qafoo
Władysław Bodzek (wladekb)
Bogdan Drutu (bogdandrutu) Google
Grayson Koonce (breerly) Uber
Marcin Grzejszczak (marcingrzejszczak) Zipkin
Fabian Lange (CodingFabian) Instana
Paul Caporn (drpacman) BBC
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Tobias Schottdorf (tschottdorf) Cockroach Labs
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Brandon Gonzales (bg451) Student
Josh MacDonald (jmacd)
Bas van Beek (basvanbeek)
Stephen Gutekanst (slimsag) Sourcegraph
Richard Scothern (RichardScothern) Docker
Tamir Duberstein (tamird) Cockroach Labs
Kris Kowal (kriskowal) (I think Uber)
Aleksey (IncSW)
Kyle Conroy (kyleconroy) Stripe
Blake Mizerany (bmizerany) Life360
Sebastián Vera (sebastianvera)
Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
Alexander Sorokin (syrnick)
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Brandon Gonzales (bg451)
Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Adrian Cole (adriancole) Pivotal / Zipkin
Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache / Cassandra
Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Mohamed Ezzat (m-ezzat)
Christian Weiss (cwe1ss) Consultant
Daniel Wallin (dawallin) Frontwalker
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman)
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Josh MacDonald (jmacd) LightStep
Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc
Yes
The OpenTracing (http://opentracing.io/) team has iterated on their project proposal to a final one which is ready for voting by TOC members: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/15 So please vote! The proposal is also embedded below for your convenience:OpenTracing Proposal
Name of project: OpenTracing
Description: A set of consistent, expressive, vendor-neutral APIs for distributed tracing and context propagation, seeslides for the content we presented to the CNCF TOC.
Sponsor / Advisor from TOC: Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
Unique Identifier: opentracing
License: Apache License v2.0
Source control repositories:
Initial Committers:
Ben Sigelman (@bensigelman)
Yuri Shkuro (@yurishkuro)
see the Contributors section for more information
Infrastructure requirements: CI and potentially CNCF Community Cluster access
Issue tracker: global - https://github.com/
opentracing/opentracing. github.io/issues and per-platform issues are raised on the per-platform repository’s issues area Mailing lists
Website: http://opentracing.io
Release methodology and mechanics: Various across platforms
Social media accounts: Twitter: @opentracing
Existing sponsorship: Nothing formal; LightStep occasionally spends small amounts of money (hosting events, etc) on behalf of OpenTracing tech talks and so forth.
External Dependencies
Really very little. The core OpenTracing libraries are facade APIs and thus only bring in dependencies that are needed to describe various function parameters and return values. In some cases there are test harnesses that bring in ubiquitous testing packages. OpenTracing is willing to go through and formally enumerate all of these dependencies, but suffice to say there’s nothing interesting to see and everything is permissively licensed.
Statement on alignment with CNCF mission:
OpenTracing is an open API standard for distributed tracing in applications and OSS packages. Developers with experience building microservices at scale understand the role and importance of distributed tracing: per-process logging and metric monitoring have their place, but neither can reconstruct the elaborate journeys that transactions take as they propagate across a distributed system. Distributed traces are these journeys.
So if distributed tracing is so valuable, why doesn’t everyone do it already? Because tracing instrumentation has been fragmented, syntactically inconsistent, and thus excessively expensive to deploy end-to-end across most cloud-native stacks.
Distributed tracing is challenging because the instrumentation must propagate the tracing context both within and between processes. Accomplishing this involves many distinct pieces in a (micro-)service stack. In particular, tracing context must be passed through:
Self-contained OSS services (e.g., NGINX, Cassandra, Redis, etc)
OSS packages linked into custom services (e.g., grpc, ORMs, etc)
Arbitrary application glue and business logic built around the above
And there’s the rub: It is not reasonable to ask all OSS services and all OSS packages and all application-specific code to use a single tracing vendor; yet, if they don’t share a mechanism for trace description and propagation, the causal chain is broken and the traces are truncated, often to the point of uselessness. We need a single, standard mechanism to describe the behavior of our systems. OpenTracing is that single, standard mechanism.
Regarding CNCF’s charter mission, OpenTracing is specifically concerned with making loosely-coupled [micro]services easier to manage. As such, it is strongly aligned with CNCF and its goal to “significantly increase the overall agility and maintainability of applications” by “[making] technology ubiquitous and easily available through reliable interfaces.” Indeed, OpenTracing and CNCF as a whole mutually benefit one another. (It should be noted that, as it is focused on standard instrumentation more than standard encoding formats, OpenTracing today is most relevant at the application layer; it has few specific opinions about — or strong dependencies on — the container layer or orchestration systems more generally, though service discovery and high-quality tracing are symbiotic.)
See also: the OpenTracing raison d’être on Medium
Other Contributors:
OpenTracing Semantics Repo (formally the opentracing.github.io docs repo)
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
Priyanka Sharma (pritianka) LightStep
Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache
Ivan Fraixedes (ifraixedes)
Github issue/discussion participation:
Rodrigo Fonseca (rfonseca) Brown University
Colin Patrick McCabe (cmccabe) Cloudera
Cagatay Kavukcuoglu (tinkerware) Base60Labs
Benjamin Eberlei (beberlei) Qafoo
Władysław Bodzek (wladekb)
Bogdan Drutu (bogdandrutu) Google
Grayson Koonce (breerly) Uber
Marcin Grzejszczak (marcingrzejszczak) Zipkin
Fabian Lange (CodingFabian) Instana
Paul Caporn (drpacman) BBC
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Tobias Schottdorf (tschottdorf) Cockroach Labs
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Brandon Gonzales (bg451) Student
Josh MacDonald (jmacd)
Bas van Beek (basvanbeek)
Stephen Gutekanst (slimsag) Sourcegraph
Richard Scothern (RichardScothern) Docker
Tamir Duberstein (tamird) Cockroach Labs
Kris Kowal (kriskowal) (I think Uber)
Aleksey (IncSW)
Kyle Conroy (kyleconroy) Stripe
Blake Mizerany (bmizerany) Life360
Sebastián Vera (sebastianvera)
Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
Alexander Sorokin (syrnick)
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Brandon Gonzales (bg451)
Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Adrian Cole (adriancole) Pivotal / Zipkin
Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache / Cassandra
Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Mohamed Ezzat (m-ezzat)
Christian Weiss (cwe1ss) Consultant
Daniel Wallin (dawallin) Frontwalker
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman)
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Josh MacDonald (jmacd) LightStep
Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc
Yes!
- Bryan
The OpenTracing (http://opentracing.io/) team has iterated on their project proposal to a final one which is ready for voting by TOC members: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/15 So please vote! The proposal is also embedded below for your convenience:OpenTracing Proposal
Name of project: OpenTracing
Description: A set of consistent, expressive, vendor-neutral APIs for distributed tracing and context propagation, seeslides for the content we presented to the CNCF TOC.
Sponsor / Advisor from TOC: Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
Unique Identifier: opentracing
License: Apache License v2.0
Source control repositories:
Initial Committers:
Ben Sigelman (@bensigelman)
Yuri Shkuro (@yurishkuro)
see the Contributors section for more information
Infrastructure requirements: CI and potentially CNCF Community Cluster access
Issue tracker: global - https://github.com/
opentracing/opentracing. github.io/issues and per-platform issues are raised on the per-platform repository’s issues area Mailing lists
Website: http://opentracing.io
Release methodology and mechanics: Various across platforms
Social media accounts: Twitter: @opentracing
Existing sponsorship: Nothing formal; LightStep occasionally spends small amounts of money (hosting events, etc) on behalf of OpenTracing tech talks and so forth.
External Dependencies
Really very little. The core OpenTracing libraries are facade APIs and thus only bring in dependencies that are needed to describe various function parameters and return values. In some cases there are test harnesses that bring in ubiquitous testing packages. OpenTracing is willing to go through and formally enumerate all of these dependencies, but suffice to say there’s nothing interesting to see and everything is permissively licensed.
Statement on alignment with CNCF mission:
OpenTracing is an open API standard for distributed tracing in applications and OSS packages. Developers with experience building microservices at scale understand the role and importance of distributed tracing: per-process logging and metric monitoring have their place, but neither can reconstruct the elaborate journeys that transactions take as they propagate across a distributed system. Distributed traces are these journeys.
So if distributed tracing is so valuable, why doesn’t everyone do it already? Because tracing instrumentation has been fragmented, syntactically inconsistent, and thus excessively expensive to deploy end-to-end across most cloud-native stacks.
Distributed tracing is challenging because the instrumentation must propagate the tracing context both within and between processes. Accomplishing this involves many distinct pieces in a (micro-)service stack. In particular, tracing context must be passed through:
Self-contained OSS services (e.g., NGINX, Cassandra, Redis, etc)
OSS packages linked into custom services (e.g., grpc, ORMs, etc)
Arbitrary application glue and business logic built around the above
And there’s the rub: It is not reasonable to ask all OSS services and all OSS packages and all application-specific code to use a single tracing vendor; yet, if they don’t share a mechanism for trace description and propagation, the causal chain is broken and the traces are truncated, often to the point of uselessness. We need a single, standard mechanism to describe the behavior of our systems. OpenTracing is that single, standard mechanism.
Regarding CNCF’s charter mission, OpenTracing is specifically concerned with making loosely-coupled [micro]services easier to manage. As such, it is strongly aligned with CNCF and its goal to “significantly increase the overall agility and maintainability of applications” by “[making] technology ubiquitous and easily available through reliable interfaces.” Indeed, OpenTracing and CNCF as a whole mutually benefit one another. (It should be noted that, as it is focused on standard instrumentation more than standard encoding formats, OpenTracing today is most relevant at the application layer; it has few specific opinions about — or strong dependencies on — the container layer or orchestration systems more generally, though service discovery and high-quality tracing are symbiotic.)
See also: the OpenTracing raison d’être on Medium
Other Contributors:
OpenTracing Semantics Repo (formally the opentracing.github.io docs repo)
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
Priyanka Sharma (pritianka) LightStep
Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache
Ivan Fraixedes (ifraixedes)
Github issue/discussion participation:
Rodrigo Fonseca (rfonseca) Brown University
Colin Patrick McCabe (cmccabe) Cloudera
Cagatay Kavukcuoglu (tinkerware) Base60Labs
Benjamin Eberlei (beberlei) Qafoo
Władysław Bodzek (wladekb)
Bogdan Drutu (bogdandrutu) Google
Grayson Koonce (breerly) Uber
Marcin Grzejszczak (marcingrzejszczak) Zipkin
Fabian Lange (CodingFabian) Instana
Paul Caporn (drpacman) BBC
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Tobias Schottdorf (tschottdorf) Cockroach Labs
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Brandon Gonzales (bg451) Student
Josh MacDonald (jmacd)
Bas van Beek (basvanbeek)
Stephen Gutekanst (slimsag) Sourcegraph
Richard Scothern (RichardScothern) Docker
Tamir Duberstein (tamird) Cockroach Labs
Kris Kowal (kriskowal) (I think Uber)
Aleksey (IncSW)
Kyle Conroy (kyleconroy) Stripe
Blake Mizerany (bmizerany) Life360
Sebastián Vera (sebastianvera)
Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
Alexander Sorokin (syrnick)
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Brandon Gonzales (bg451)
Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Adrian Cole (adriancole) Pivotal / Zipkin
Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache / Cassandra
Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
Mohamed Ezzat (m-ezzat)
Christian Weiss (cwe1ss) Consultant
Daniel Wallin (dawallin) Frontwalker
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman)
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
Josh MacDonald (jmacd) LightStep
Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc
Yes
|
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 10:48 AM
To: cncf-toc@...
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] OpenTracing Project Proposal
The OpenTracing (http://opentracing.io/) team has iterated on their project proposal to a final one which is ready for voting by TOC members: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/15
So please vote! The proposal is also embedded below for your convenience:
OpenTracing Proposal
Name of project: OpenTracing
Description: A set of consistent, expressive, vendor-neutral APIs for distributed tracing and context propagation, seeslides for the content we presented to the CNCF TOC.
Sponsor / Advisor from TOC: Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
Unique Identifier: opentracing
License: Apache License v2.0
Source control repositories:
Initial Committers:
· Ben Sigelman (@bensigelman)
· Yuri Shkuro (@yurishkuro)
· see the Contributors section for more information
Infrastructure requirements: CI and potentially CNCF Community Cluster access
Issue tracker: global - https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing.github.io/issues and per-platform issues are raised on the per-platform repository’s issues area
Mailing lists
· Active: https://gitter.im/opentracing/public
· Placeholder: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/opentracing
· Related: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/distributed-tracing
Website: http://opentracing.io
Release methodology and mechanics: Various across platforms
Social media accounts: Twitter: @opentracing
Existing sponsorship: Nothing formal; LightStep occasionally spends small amounts of money (hosting events, etc) on behalf of OpenTracing tech talks and so forth.
External Dependencies
Really very little. The core OpenTracing libraries are facade APIs and thus only bring in dependencies that are needed to describe various function parameters and return values. In some cases there are test harnesses that bring in ubiquitous testing packages. OpenTracing is willing to go through and formally enumerate all of these dependencies, but suffice to say there’s nothing interesting to see and everything is permissively licensed.
Statement on alignment with CNCF mission:
OpenTracing is an open API standard for distributed tracing in applications and OSS packages. Developers with experience building microservices at scale understand the role and importance of distributed tracing: per-process logging and metric monitoring have their place, but neither can reconstruct the elaborate journeys that transactions take as they propagate across a distributed system. Distributed traces are these journeys.
So if distributed tracing is so valuable, why doesn’t everyone do it already? Because tracing instrumentation has been fragmented, syntactically inconsistent, and thus excessively expensive to deploy end-to-end across most cloud-native stacks.
Distributed tracing is challenging because the instrumentation must propagate the tracing context both within and between processes. Accomplishing this involves many distinct pieces in a (micro-)service stack. In particular, tracing context must be passed through:
· Self-contained OSS services (e.g., NGINX, Cassandra, Redis, etc)
· OSS packages linked into custom services (e.g., grpc, ORMs, etc)
· Arbitrary application glue and business logic built around the above
And there’s the rub: It is not reasonable to ask all OSS services and all OSS packages and all application-specific code to use a single tracing vendor; yet, if they don’t share a mechanism for trace description and propagation, the causal chain is broken and the traces are truncated, often to the point of uselessness. We need a single, standard mechanism to describe the behavior of our systems. OpenTracing is that single, standard mechanism.
Regarding CNCF’s charter mission, OpenTracing is specifically concerned with making loosely-coupled [micro]services easier to manage. As such, it is strongly aligned with CNCF and its goal to “significantly increase the overall agility and maintainability of applications” by “[making] technology ubiquitous and easily available through reliable interfaces.” Indeed, OpenTracing and CNCF as a whole mutually benefit one another. (It should be noted that, as it is focused on standard instrumentation more than standard encoding formats, OpenTracing today is most relevant at the application layer; it has few specific opinions about — or strong dependencies on — the container layer or orchestration systems more generally, though service discovery and high-quality tracing are symbiotic.)
See also: the OpenTracing raison d’être on Medium
Other Contributors:
OpenTracing Semantics Repo (formally the opentracing.github.io docs repo)
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
· Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
· Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
· Priyanka Sharma (pritianka) LightStep
· Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
· Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache
· Ivan Fraixedes (ifraixedes)
Github issue/discussion participation:
· Rodrigo Fonseca (rfonseca) Brown University
· Colin Patrick McCabe (cmccabe) Cloudera
· Cagatay Kavukcuoglu (tinkerware) Base60Labs
· Benjamin Eberlei (beberlei) Qafoo
· Władysław Bodzek (wladekb)
· Bogdan Drutu (bogdandrutu) Google
· Grayson Koonce (breerly) Uber
· Marcin Grzejszczak (marcingrzejszczak) Zipkin
· Fabian Lange (CodingFabian) Instana
· Paul Caporn (drpacman) BBC
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Tobias Schottdorf (tschottdorf) Cockroach Labs
· Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
· Brandon Gonzales (bg451) Student
· Josh MacDonald (jmacd)
· Bas van Beek (basvanbeek)
· Stephen Gutekanst (slimsag) Sourcegraph
· Richard Scothern (RichardScothern) Docker
· Tamir Duberstein (tamird) Cockroach Labs
· Kris Kowal (kriskowal) (I think Uber)
· Aleksey (IncSW)
· Kyle Conroy (kyleconroy) Stripe
· Blake Mizerany (bmizerany) Life360
· Sebastián Vera (sebastianvera)
· Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
· Alexander Sorokin (syrnick)
· Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
· Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Brandon Gonzales (bg451)
· Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Adrian Cole (adriancole) Pivotal / Zipkin
· Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache / Cassandra
· Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
· Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
· Mohamed Ezzat (m-ezzat)
· Christian Weiss (cwe1ss) Consultant
· Daniel Wallin (dawallin) Frontwalker
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman)
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Josh MacDonald (jmacd) LightStep
· Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Yes
Kenneth Owens
CTO Cloud Native Platforms
Cloud Platforms and Services Group
kenowens@...
Phone: +1 408 424 0872
Mobile: +1 314 591 5708
Think before you print.
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/ cri/index.html
From: cncf-toc-bounces@... [mailto:cncf-toc-bounces@
lists.cncf.io] On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 10:48 AM
To: cncf-toc@...
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] OpenTracing Project Proposal
The OpenTracing (http://opentracing.io/) team has iterated on their project proposal to a final one which is ready for voting by TOC members: https://github.com/cncf/toc/
pull/15
So please vote! The proposal is also embedded below for your convenience:
OpenTracing Proposal
Name of project: OpenTracing
Description: A set of consistent, expressive, vendor-neutral APIs for distributed tracing and context propagation, seeslides for the content we presented to the CNCF TOC.
Sponsor / Advisor from TOC: Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
Unique Identifier: opentracing
License: Apache License v2.0
Source control repositories:
Initial Committers:
· Ben Sigelman (@bensigelman)
· Yuri Shkuro (@yurishkuro)
· see the Contributors section for more information
Infrastructure requirements: CI and potentially CNCF Community Cluster access
Issue tracker: global - https://github.com/
opentracing/opentracing. github.io/issues and per-platform issues are raised on the per-platform repository’s issues area Mailing lists
· Active: https://gitter.im/
opentracing/public · Placeholder: https://groups.
google.com/forum/#!forum/ opentracing · Related: https://groups.
google.com/forum/#!forum/ distributed-tracing Website: http://opentracing.io
Release methodology and mechanics: Various across platforms
Social media accounts: Twitter: @opentracing
Existing sponsorship: Nothing formal; LightStep occasionally spends small amounts of money (hosting events, etc) on behalf of OpenTracing tech talks and so forth.
External Dependencies
Really very little. The core OpenTracing libraries are facade APIs and thus only bring in dependencies that are needed to describe various function parameters and return values. In some cases there are test harnesses that bring in ubiquitous testing packages. OpenTracing is willing to go through and formally enumerate all of these dependencies, but suffice to say there’s nothing interesting to see and everything is permissively licensed.
Statement on alignment with CNCF mission:
OpenTracing is an open API standard for distributed tracing in applications and OSS packages. Developers with experience building microservices at scale understand the role and importance of distributed tracing: per-process logging and metric monitoring have their place, but neither can reconstruct the elaborate journeys that transactions take as they propagate across a distributed system. Distributed traces are these journeys.
So if distributed tracing is so valuable, why doesn’t everyone do it already? Because tracing instrumentation has been fragmented, syntactically inconsistent, and thus excessively expensive to deploy end-to-end across most cloud-native stacks.
Distributed tracing is challenging because the instrumentation must propagate the tracing context both within and between processes. Accomplishing this involves many distinct pieces in a (micro-)service stack. In particular, tracing context must be passed through:
· Self-contained OSS services (e.g., NGINX, Cassandra, Redis, etc)
· OSS packages linked into custom services (e.g., grpc, ORMs, etc)
· Arbitrary application glue and business logic built around the above
And there’s the rub: It is not reasonable to ask all OSS services and all OSS packages and all application-specific code to use a single tracing vendor; yet, if they don’t share a mechanism for trace description and propagation, the causal chain is broken and the traces are truncated, often to the point of uselessness. We need a single, standard mechanism to describe the behavior of our systems. OpenTracing is that single, standard mechanism.
Regarding CNCF’s charter mission, OpenTracing is specifically concerned with making loosely-coupled [micro]services easier to manage. As such, it is strongly aligned with CNCF and its goal to “significantly increase the overall agility and maintainability of applications” by “[making] technology ubiquitous and easily available through reliable interfaces.” Indeed, OpenTracing and CNCF as a whole mutually benefit one another. (It should be noted that, as it is focused on standard instrumentation more than standard encoding formats, OpenTracing today is most relevant at the application layer; it has few specific opinions about — or strong dependencies on — the container layer or orchestration systems more generally, though service discovery and high-quality tracing are symbiotic.)
See also: the OpenTracing raison d’être on Medium
Other Contributors:
OpenTracing Semantics Repo (formally the opentracing.github.io docs repo)
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
· Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
· Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
· Priyanka Sharma (pritianka) LightStep
· Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
· Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache
· Ivan Fraixedes (ifraixedes)
Github issue/discussion participation:
· Rodrigo Fonseca (rfonseca) Brown University
· Colin Patrick McCabe (cmccabe) Cloudera
· Cagatay Kavukcuoglu (tinkerware) Base60Labs
· Benjamin Eberlei (beberlei) Qafoo
· Władysław Bodzek (wladekb)
· Bogdan Drutu (bogdandrutu) Google
· Grayson Koonce (breerly) Uber
· Marcin Grzejszczak (marcingrzejszczak) Zipkin
· Fabian Lange (CodingFabian) Instana
· Paul Caporn (drpacman) BBC
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Tobias Schottdorf (tschottdorf) Cockroach Labs
· Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
· Brandon Gonzales (bg451) Student
· Josh MacDonald (jmacd)
· Bas van Beek (basvanbeek)
· Stephen Gutekanst (slimsag) Sourcegraph
· Richard Scothern (RichardScothern) Docker
· Tamir Duberstein (tamird) Cockroach Labs
· Kris Kowal (kriskowal) (I think Uber)
· Aleksey (IncSW)
· Kyle Conroy (kyleconroy) Stripe
· Blake Mizerany (bmizerany) Life360
· Sebastián Vera (sebastianvera)
· Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
· Alexander Sorokin (syrnick)
· Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
· Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Brandon Gonzales (bg451)
· Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Adrian Cole (adriancole) Pivotal / Zipkin
· Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache / Cassandra
· Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
· Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
· Mohamed Ezzat (m-ezzat)
· Christian Weiss (cwe1ss) Consultant
· Daniel Wallin (dawallin) Frontwalker
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman)
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Josh MacDonald (jmacd) LightStep
· Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc
we have 6 YES votes from TOCOn Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Kenneth Owens (kenowens) via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:______________________________Yes
Kenneth Owens
CTO Cloud Native Platforms
Cloud Platforms and Services Group
kenowens@...
Phone: +1 408 424 0872
Mobile: +1 314 591 5708
Think before you print.
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ index.html
From: cncf-toc-bounces@... [mailto:cncf-toc-bounces@lists
.cncf.io] On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 10:48 AM
To: cncf-toc@...
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] OpenTracing Project Proposal
The OpenTracing (http://opentracing.io/) team has iterated on their project proposal to a final one which is ready for voting by TOC members: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pu
ll/15
So please vote! The proposal is also embedded below for your convenience:
OpenTracing Proposal
Name of project: OpenTracing
Description: A set of consistent, expressive, vendor-neutral APIs for distributed tracing and context propagation, seeslides for the content we presented to the CNCF TOC.
Sponsor / Advisor from TOC: Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
Unique Identifier: opentracing
License: Apache License v2.0
Source control repositories:
Initial Committers:
· Ben Sigelman (@bensigelman)
· Yuri Shkuro (@yurishkuro)
· see the Contributors section for more information
Infrastructure requirements: CI and potentially CNCF Community Cluster access
Issue tracker: global - https://github.com/opentraci
ng/opentracing.github.io/ issues and per-platform issues are raised on the per-platform repository’s issues area Mailing lists
· Active: https://gitter.im/open
tracing/public · Placeholder: https://groups.go
ogle.com/forum/#!forum/opentra cing · Related: https://groups.google
.com/forum/#!forum/distributed -tracing Website: http://opentracing.io
Release methodology and mechanics: Various across platforms
Social media accounts: Twitter: @opentracing
Existing sponsorship: Nothing formal; LightStep occasionally spends small amounts of money (hosting events, etc) on behalf of OpenTracing tech talks and so forth.
External Dependencies
Really very little. The core OpenTracing libraries are facade APIs and thus only bring in dependencies that are needed to describe various function parameters and return values. In some cases there are test harnesses that bring in ubiquitous testing packages. OpenTracing is willing to go through and formally enumerate all of these dependencies, but suffice to say there’s nothing interesting to see and everything is permissively licensed.
Statement on alignment with CNCF mission:
OpenTracing is an open API standard for distributed tracing in applications and OSS packages. Developers with experience building microservices at scale understand the role and importance of distributed tracing: per-process logging and metric monitoring have their place, but neither can reconstruct the elaborate journeys that transactions take as they propagate across a distributed system. Distributed traces are these journeys.
So if distributed tracing is so valuable, why doesn’t everyone do it already? Because tracing instrumentation has been fragmented, syntactically inconsistent, and thus excessively expensive to deploy end-to-end across most cloud-native stacks.
Distributed tracing is challenging because the instrumentation must propagate the tracing context both within and between processes. Accomplishing this involves many distinct pieces in a (micro-)service stack. In particular, tracing context must be passed through:
· Self-contained OSS services (e.g., NGINX, Cassandra, Redis, etc)
· OSS packages linked into custom services (e.g., grpc, ORMs, etc)
· Arbitrary application glue and business logic built around the above
And there’s the rub: It is not reasonable to ask all OSS services and all OSS packages and all application-specific code to use a single tracing vendor; yet, if they don’t share a mechanism for trace description and propagation, the causal chain is broken and the traces are truncated, often to the point of uselessness. We need a single, standard mechanism to describe the behavior of our systems. OpenTracing is that single, standard mechanism.
Regarding CNCF’s charter mission, OpenTracing is specifically concerned with making loosely-coupled [micro]services easier to manage. As such, it is strongly aligned with CNCF and its goal to “significantly increase the overall agility and maintainability of applications” by “[making] technology ubiquitous and easily available through reliable interfaces.” Indeed, OpenTracing and CNCF as a whole mutually benefit one another. (It should be noted that, as it is focused on standard instrumentation more than standard encoding formats, OpenTracing today is most relevant at the application layer; it has few specific opinions about — or strong dependencies on — the container layer or orchestration systems more generally, though service discovery and high-quality tracing are symbiotic.)
See also: the OpenTracing raison d’être on Medium
Other Contributors:
OpenTracing Semantics Repo (formally the opentracing.github.io docs repo)
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
· Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
· Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
· Priyanka Sharma (pritianka) LightStep
· Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
· Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache
· Ivan Fraixedes (ifraixedes)
Github issue/discussion participation:
· Rodrigo Fonseca (rfonseca) Brown University
· Colin Patrick McCabe (cmccabe) Cloudera
· Cagatay Kavukcuoglu (tinkerware) Base60Labs
· Benjamin Eberlei (beberlei) Qafoo
· Władysław Bodzek (wladekb)
· Bogdan Drutu (bogdandrutu) Google
· Grayson Koonce (breerly) Uber
· Marcin Grzejszczak (marcingrzejszczak) Zipkin
· Fabian Lange (CodingFabian) Instana
· Paul Caporn (drpacman) BBC
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Tobias Schottdorf (tschottdorf) Cockroach Labs
· Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
· Brandon Gonzales (bg451) Student
· Josh MacDonald (jmacd)
· Bas van Beek (basvanbeek)
· Stephen Gutekanst (slimsag) Sourcegraph
· Richard Scothern (RichardScothern) Docker
· Tamir Duberstein (tamird) Cockroach Labs
· Kris Kowal (kriskowal) (I think Uber)
· Aleksey (IncSW)
· Kyle Conroy (kyleconroy) Stripe
· Blake Mizerany (bmizerany) Life360
· Sebastián Vera (sebastianvera)
· Ben Cronin (bcronin) LightStep
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
· Alexander Sorokin (syrnick)
· Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
· Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Brandon Gonzales (bg451)
· Dan Kuebrich (dkuebric) AppNeta
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Adrian Cole (adriancole) Pivotal / Zipkin
· Mck (michaelsembwever) Apache / Cassandra
· Onwukike Ibe (oike) Uber
· Yuri Shkuro (yurishkuro) Uber
· Mohamed Ezzat (m-ezzat)
· Christian Weiss (cwe1ss) Consultant
· Daniel Wallin (dawallin) Frontwalker
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman)
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
· Josh MacDonald (jmacd) LightStep
· Dimitrios Kouzis-Loukas (lookfwd) Bloomberg
· Ben Sigelman (bensigelman) LightStep
_________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc
_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc