Hi everyone,
I’d like to suggest that every SIG should have a space on the TOC open meeting agenda to present an update. I’m picturing a summary of recent SIG outputs, upcoming plans, maybe a brief dive into any particularly interesting or contentious conclusions.
We can time-box these discussions and if there are additional questions or folks interested in a deeper dive, this could be scheduled separately.
What do you think?
|
|

Alex Chircop
Yes - this makes sense - happy to do this. It would also serve as a means to get TOC feedback and for the SIG to raise any items that might require TOC discussion. If there are items that require a deep dive, they could even move to the SIG call directly
perhaps.
+1 from me.
Thanks,
Alex
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: "Liz Rice via Lists.Cncf.Io" <liz=lizrice.com@...>
Sent: Thursday, 8 August 2019 12:11
To: cncf-toc@...
Cc: cncf-toc@...
Subject: [cncf-toc] SIG updates at TOC open meetings
Hi everyone,
I’d like to suggest that every SIG should have a space on the TOC open meeting agenda to present an update. I’m picturing a summary of recent SIG outputs, upcoming plans, maybe a brief dive into any particularly interesting or contentious conclusions.
We can time-box these discussions and if there are additional questions or folks interested in a deeper dive, this could be scheduled separately.
What do you think?
|
|
I'm going to assume that folks didn't respond because they think it's a good idea :-)
Amye, please could you coordinate with the SIG chairs and get them onto the agenda for the next public TOC meeting (Sep)? These can be *brief* updates, maybe one slide each SIG. We'll see how it works and iterate from there.
On 8 Aug 2019, 10:46 +0100, Alex Chircop <alex.chircop@...>, wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Yes - this makes sense - happy to do this. It would also serve as a means to get TOC feedback and for the SIG to raise any items that might require TOC discussion. If there are items that require a deep dive, they could even move to the SIG call directly perhaps.
+1 from me.
Thanks,
Alex
From: "Liz Rice via Lists.Cncf.Io" <liz=lizrice.com@...>
Sent: Thursday, 8 August 2019 12:11
To: cncf-toc@...
Cc: cncf-toc@...
Subject: [cncf-toc] SIG updates at TOC open meetings
Hi everyone,
I’d like to suggest that every SIG should have a space on the TOC open meeting agenda to present an update. I’m picturing a summary of recent SIG outputs, upcoming plans, maybe a brief dive into any particularly interesting or contentious conclusions.
We can time-box these discussions and if there are additional questions or folks interested in a deeper dive, this could be scheduled separately.
What do you think?
|
|
It would be great to hear about what all the SIGs are doing at a TOC meeting, and have a regular time/place to share updates from SIG-Security.
I think I'm missing a little context -- I couldn't find anything in the toc repo or by searching on google referencing frequency and format of "TOC open meetings."
Most meetings are public meetings and I think a few times per month would be too frequent. Does this refer to the meetings that usually happen at KubeCon/CloudNativeCon?
Thanks! Sarah
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 1:58 AM Liz Rice < liz@...> wrote:
I'm going to assume that folks didn't respond because they think it's a good idea :-)
Amye, please could you coordinate with the SIG chairs and get them onto the agenda for the next public TOC meeting (Sep)? These can be *brief* updates, maybe one slide each SIG. We'll see how it works and iterate from there.
On 8 Aug 2019, 10:46 +0100, Alex Chircop < alex.chircop@...>, wrote:
Yes - this makes sense - happy to do this. It would also serve as a means to get TOC feedback and for the SIG to raise any items that might require TOC discussion. If there are items that require a deep dive, they could even move to the SIG call directly perhaps.
+1 from me.
Thanks,
Alex
Hi everyone,
I’d like to suggest that every SIG should have a space on the TOC open meeting agenda to present an update. I’m picturing a summary of recent SIG outputs, upcoming plans, maybe a brief dive into any particularly interesting or contentious conclusions.
We can time-box these discussions and if there are additional questions or folks interested in a deeper dive, this could be scheduled separately.
What do you think?
|
|
I meant the monthly public TOC meetings (1st Tue of the month, the ones that aren't dedicated for project reviews)
On 17 Aug 2019, 15:08 +0100, Sarah Allen <sarah@...>, wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
It would be great to hear about what all the SIGs are doing at a TOC meeting, and have a regular time/place to share updates from SIG-Security.
I think I'm missing a little context -- I couldn't find anything in the toc repo or by searching on google referencing frequency and format of "TOC open meetings."
Most meetings are public meetings and I think a few times per month would be too frequent. Does this refer to the meetings that usually happen at KubeCon/CloudNativeCon?
Thanks!
Sarah
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 1:58 AM Liz Rice < liz@...> wrote:
I'm going to assume that folks didn't respond because they think it's a good idea :-)
Amye, please could you coordinate with the SIG chairs and get them onto the agenda for the next public TOC meeting (Sep)? These can be *brief* updates, maybe one slide each SIG. We'll see how it works and iterate from there.
On 8 Aug 2019, 10:46 +0100, Alex Chircop < alex.chircop@...>, wrote:
Yes - this makes sense - happy to do this. It would also serve as a means to get TOC feedback and for the SIG to raise any items that might require TOC discussion. If there are items that require a deep dive, they could even move to the SIG call directly perhaps.
+1 from me.
Thanks,
Alex
Hi everyone,
I’d like to suggest that every SIG should have a space on the TOC open meeting agenda to present an update. I’m picturing a summary of recent SIG outputs, upcoming plans, maybe a brief dive into any particularly interesting or contentious conclusions.
We can time-box these discussions and if there are additional questions or folks interested in a deeper dive, this could be scheduled separately.
What do you think?
|
|
We've recently changed the TOC meeting structure: 1st Tuesday of the month is a public TOC meeting 2nd Tuesday is a closed TOC meeting 3rd Tuesday is project presentation. Our notes are always on the TOC Working Doc.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 9:08 AM Sarah Allen < sarah@...> wrote:
It would be great to hear about what all the SIGs are doing at a TOC meeting, and have a regular time/place to share updates from SIG-Security.
I think I'm missing a little context -- I couldn't find anything in the toc repo or by searching on google referencing frequency and format of "TOC open meetings."
Most meetings are public meetings and I think a few times per month would be too frequent. Does this refer to the meetings that usually happen at KubeCon/CloudNativeCon?
Thanks! Sarah
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 1:58 AM Liz Rice < liz@...> wrote:
I'm going to assume that folks didn't respond because they think it's a good idea :-)
Amye, please could you coordinate with the SIG chairs and get them onto the agenda for the next public TOC meeting (Sep)? These can be *brief* updates, maybe one slide each SIG. We'll see how it works and iterate from there.
On 8 Aug 2019, 10:46 +0100, Alex Chircop < alex.chircop@...>, wrote:
Yes - this makes sense - happy to do this. It would also serve as a means to get TOC feedback and for the SIG to raise any items that might require TOC discussion. If there are items that require a deep dive, they could even move to the SIG call directly perhaps.
+1 from me.
Thanks,
Alex
Hi everyone,
I’d like to suggest that every SIG should have a space on the TOC open meeting agenda to present an update. I’m picturing a summary of recent SIG outputs, upcoming plans, maybe a brief dive into any particularly interesting or contentious conclusions.
We can time-box these discussions and if there are additional questions or folks interested in a deeper dive, this could be scheduled separately.
What do you think?
-- Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@...
|
|