[VOTE] rkt archiving


Chris Aniszczyk
 

Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Doug Davis <dug@...>
 

+1 nb


thanks
-Doug
_______________________________________________________
STSM | IBM Hybrid Cloud | OM Knative
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@...
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog

"Chris Aniszczyk" ---08/02/2019 11:31:09 AM---Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multipl

From: "Chris Aniszczyk" <caniszczyk@...>
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Date: 08/02/2019 11:31 AM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rkt archiving
Sent by: cncf-toc@...





Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719




Ruben Orduz <orduzr@...>
 

With sadness +1 (nb)

On Aug 2, 2019, at 11:30 AM, Chris Aniszczyk via Lists.Cncf.Io <caniszczyk=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:

Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Randy Abernethy
 

+1 nb

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719



--
-- 
Randy Abernethy
Managing Partner
RX-M, LLC
randy.abernethy@...
o 415-800-2922
c 415-624-6447


Matthew Hunt (BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEX)
 

+1

From: caniszczyk@... At: 08/02/19 11:31:04
To: cncf-toc@...
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rkt archiving

Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Joe Beda <jbeda@...>
 

+1 binding

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Friday, August 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rkt archiving

 

Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

 

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

 

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

 

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

 

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Chris Short
 

+1 NB but CoreOS still had the best logos

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 11:50 via Lists.Cncf.Io <jbeda=vmware.com@...> wrote:

+1 binding

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Friday, August 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rkt archiving

 

Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

 

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

 

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

 

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

 

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

--

Chris Short
He/Him/They


Stephen Augustus
 

+1 nb
*Stares at my rkt shirt with tears in my eyes*

-- Stephen


On Fri, Aug 2, 2019, 11:31 Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Brian Grant
 

+1 binding

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Brendan Burns
 

+1, binding


From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Brian Grant via Lists.Cncf.Io <briangrant=google.com@...>
Sent: Friday, August 2, 2019 9:49:09 AM
To: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Cc: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rkt archiving
 
+1 binding

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Li, Xiang
 

------------------------------------------------------------------
发件人:Chris Aniszczyk<caniszczyk@...>
日 期:2019年08月02日 23:30:26
收件人:CNCF TOC<cncf-toc@...>
主 题:[cncf-toc] [VOTE] rkt archiving

Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Matt Klein
 

+1 binding

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Jon Mittelhauser
 

+1 NB

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Matt Klein <mattklein123@...>
Date: Friday, August 2, 2019 at 10:03 AM
To: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rkt archiving

 

+1 binding

 

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

 

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

 

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

 

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

 

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Igor Mameshin
 

+1 non-binding


On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:04 AM Jon Mittelhauser <jon.mittelhauser@...> wrote:

+1 NB

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Matt Klein <mattklein123@...>
Date: Friday, August 2, 2019 at 10:03 AM
To: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rkt archiving

 

+1 binding

 

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

 

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

 

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

 

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

 

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


alexis richardson
 

+1 binding


On Fri, 2 Aug 2019, 18:15 Igor Mameshin, <igor@...> wrote:
+1 non-binding


On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:04 AM Jon Mittelhauser <jon.mittelhauser@...> wrote:

+1 NB

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Matt Klein <mattklein123@...>
Date: Friday, August 2, 2019 at 10:03 AM
To: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rkt archiving

 

+1 binding

 

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

 

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

 

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

 

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

 

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Brewer, Jeff
 

+1 binding

On Aug 2, 2019, at 10:23 AM, alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

This email is from an external sender.

+1 binding


On Fri, 2 Aug 2019, 18:15 Igor Mameshin, <igor@...> wrote:
+1 non-binding


On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:04 AM Jon Mittelhauser <jon.mittelhauser@...> wrote:

+1 NB

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Matt Klein <mattklein123@...>
Date: Friday, August 2, 2019 at 10:03 AM
To: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rkt archiving

 

+1 binding

 

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

 

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

 

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

 

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

 

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Jacopo Nardiello
 

+1 nb 

_______________________________________

Jacopo Nardiello
Founder SIGHUP 
CNCF Silver Member & Kubernetes Certified Service Provider (KCSP)
DevOps / Cloud-Native infrastructures




Sighup s.r.l.
Via Caldera 21, Milano (MI), 20153

IVA: 09937820968REA: MI - 2123501

Cap. Soc. 100.000 eur iv


On Fri, 02 Aug 2019 at 20:45 "Brewer, Jeff via Lists.Cncf.Io" <">"Brewer, Jeff via Lists.Cncf.Io" > wrote:
+1 binding

On Aug 2, 2019, at 10:23 AM, alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

This email is from an external sender.

+1 binding


On Fri, 2 Aug 2019, 18:15 Igor Mameshin, <igor@...> wrote:
+1 non-binding


On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:04 AM Jon Mittelhauser <jon.mittelhauser@...> wrote:

+1 NB

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Matt Klein <mattklein123@...>
Date: Friday, August 2, 2019 at 10:03 AM
To: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rkt archiving

 

+1 binding

 

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

 

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

 

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

 

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

 

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719



Erin Boyd
 

+1 nb

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 12:46 PM Brewer, Jeff via Lists.Cncf.Io <jeff_brewer=intuit.com@...> wrote:
+1 binding

On Aug 2, 2019, at 10:23 AM, alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

This email is from an external sender.

+1 binding


On Fri, 2 Aug 2019, 18:15 Igor Mameshin, <igor@...> wrote:
+1 non-binding


On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:04 AM Jon Mittelhauser <jon.mittelhauser@...> wrote:

+1 NB

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Matt Klein <mattklein123@...>
Date: Friday, August 2, 2019 at 10:03 AM
To: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rkt archiving

 

+1 binding

 

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

 

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

 

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

 

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

 

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719



--

Erin A. Boyd

Senior Principal Software Engineer, OCTO

Red Hat

eboyd@...   


Lorenzo Fontana <fontanalorenz@...>
 

+1nb

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 5:31 PM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Phil Estes
 

+1 nb

- Phil Estes

Chris Aniszczyk wrote on 8/2/19 11:30 AM:

Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719