
Chris Aniszczyk
At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io and they meet the incubation criteria requirements:
- Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately - Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox)
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io and they meet the incubation criteria requirements:
- Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately - Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox)
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
+1 non-binding Sent by mobile; please excuse my brevity.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Feb 20, 2018 17:57, "Chris Aniszczyk" < caniszczyk@...> wrote: At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io and they meet the incubation criteria requirements:
- Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately - Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox)
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
--
|
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Lee Calcote <leecalcote@...> wrote: +1 non-binding
At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io and they meet the incubation criteria requirements:
- Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately - Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox)
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
--
|
|

John Belamaric
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io
and they meet the incubation criteria requirements:
- Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately
- Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository
- Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox)
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66
Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
+1 binding
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:02 PM, John Belamaric <jbelamaric@...> wrote: +1 non-binding
On Feb 20, 2018, at 11:57 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io and they meet the incubation criteria requirements:
- Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately - Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox)
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66
Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
+1 non-binding
thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@... The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog
"Chris Aniszczyk" ---02/20/2018 08:57:36 AM---At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and reque
From: "Chris Aniszczyk" <caniszczyk@...> To: cncf-toc@... Date: 02/20/2018 08:57 AM Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation Sent by: cncf-toc@...
At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io and they meet the incubation criteria requirements: - Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately - Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox) Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl@...>
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote: At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io and they meet the incubation criteria requirements:
- Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately - Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox)
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
--
|
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote: At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io and they meet the incubation criteria requirements:
- Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately - Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox)
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
--
|
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-- Mark Interrante SVP Infrastructure Engineering | Salesforce
-- -
|
|
Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...>
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Mark Interrante <minterrante@...> wrote: +1 non-binding
|
|
|
|
+1 binding
It's also worth noting that CoreDNS announced its 1.0 release last year.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote: At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io and they meet the incubation criteria requirements:
- Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately - Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox)
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
--
|
|
Bassam Tabbara <bassam@...>
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io and they meet the incubation criteria requirements:
- Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately - Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox)
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 9:03 AM, alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote: +1 binding
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:02 PM, John Belamaric <jbelamaric@...> wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> On Feb 20, 2018, at 11:57 AM, Chris Aniszczyk
> <caniszczyk@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception
> project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the
> project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io and they meet the
> incubation criteria requirements:
>
> - Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of
> sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may
> be discussed privately
> - Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different
> companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the
> main repository
> - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged
> contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on
> the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors
> other than Miek and Infoblox)
>
> Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation
> proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66
>
> Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate
> non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
>
> --
> Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
>
>
>
|
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:57 AM Chris Aniszczyk < caniszczyk@...> wrote: At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io and they meet the incubation criteria requirements:
- Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately - Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox)
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
-- Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos
|
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Benjamin Hindman <benh@...>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 4:09:35 PM
To: cncf-toc@...
Cc: cncf-toc@...
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 binding
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:57 AM Chris Aniszczyk < caniszczyk@...> wrote:
At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io
and they meet the incubation criteria requirements:
- Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately
- Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository
- Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox)
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66
Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.
|
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018, 10:57 AM Chris Aniszczyk < caniszczyk@...> wrote: At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io and they meet the incubation criteria requirements:
- Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately - Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox)
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
Jonathan Boulle <jon@...>
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
+1 Binding
At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io and they meet the incubation criteria requirements:
- Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately - Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox)
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
--
|
|
Sam Lambert <samlambert@...>
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Jonathan Boulle <jon@...> wrote: +1 binding
|
|