Hi all In this week's TOC we converged on some possible changes to the Inception tier, that can address issues that have been raised about market perception & confusion. It is most likely that Inception will be replaced with a "Sandbox" tier. Chris Aniszczyk is drafting a written statement proposing Sandbox and associated changes and clarifications. This will include much of the discussion from the Zoom Chat on this week's TOC call. This draft is under active editing now: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MkuVT7Q6itn9ESW-iyqIXsEqTPBrStXlvzESg94933A/editUntil the TOC has reviewed the Sandbox proposal we shall suspend voting on Inception projects. I apologise for any delays that are caused by this. For the avoidance of further confusion, Sandbox will be presented *as soon as possible* which I hope means at the next TOC call. alexis On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Yang Guan via Lists.Cncf.Io <yangguan=google.com@...> wrote: +1 (non-binding)
|
|
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition to its positive connotations of fun and play, it's also dirty and filled with sniffling toddlers, broken plastic toys, and the occasional cat poop. Much, much better than "inception"!
- Bryan
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:48 PM, alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote: Hi all
In this week's TOC we converged on some possible changes to the
Inception tier, that can address issues that have been raised about
market perception & confusion. It is most likely that Inception will
be replaced with a "Sandbox" tier.
Chris Aniszczyk is drafting a written statement proposing Sandbox and
associated changes and clarifications. This will include much of the
discussion from the Zoom Chat on this week's TOC call. This draft is
under active editing now:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MkuVT7Q6itn9ESW-iyqIXsEqTPBrStXlvzESg94933A/edit
Until the TOC has reviewed the Sandbox proposal we shall suspend
voting on Inception projects. I apologise for any delays that are
caused by this. For the avoidance of further confusion, Sandbox will
be presented *as soon as possible* which I hope means at the next TOC
call.
alexis
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Yang Guan via Lists.Cncf.Io
<yangguan=google.com@lists.cncf.io> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
|
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, 10:24 Bryan Cantrill, < bryan@...> wrote: I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition to its positive connotations of fun and play, it's also dirty and filled with sniffling toddlers, broken plastic toys, and the occasional cat poop. Much, much better than "inception"!
- Bryan
|
|
Can we get the phrase "cat poop" added to the formal CNCF definition of Sandbox? That would make our governance docs much more interesting to read.
thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@... The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog
"Bryan Cantrill" ---02/08/2018 05:24:38 AM---I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition
From: "Bryan Cantrill" <bryan@...> To: cncf-toc@... Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Date: 02/08/2018 05:24 AM Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION Sent by: cncf-toc@...
I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition to its positive connotations of fun and play, it's also dirty and filled with sniffling toddlers, broken plastic toys, and the occasional cat poop. Much, much better than "inception"! - Bryan On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:48 PM, alexis richardson < alexis@...> wrote:
Hi all
In this week's TOC we converged on some possible changes to the Inception tier, that can address issues that have been raised about market perception & confusion. It is most likely that Inception will be replaced with a "Sandbox" tier.
Chris Aniszczyk is drafting a written statement proposing Sandbox and associated changes and clarifications. This will include much of the discussion from the Zoom Chat on this week's TOC call. This draft is under active editing now: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MkuVT7Q6itn9ESW-iyqIXsEqTPBrStXlvzESg94933A/edit
Until the TOC has reviewed the Sandbox proposal we shall suspend voting on Inception projects. I apologise for any delays that are caused by this. For the avoidance of further confusion, Sandbox will be presented *as soon as possible* which I hope means at the next TOC call.
alexis
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
|
|
As a dog owner, I object to that.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Doug Davis <dug@...> wrote: Can we get the phrase "cat poop" added to the formal CNCF definition of Sandbox? That would make our governance docs much more interesting to read.
thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@... The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog
"Bryan Cantrill" ---02/08/2018 05:24:38 AM---I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition
From: "Bryan Cantrill" <bryan@...> To: cncf-toc@... Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Date: 02/08/2018 05:24 AM Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION Sent by: cncf-toc@...
I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition to its positive connotations of fun and play, it's also dirty and filled with sniffling toddlers, broken plastic toys, and the occasional cat poop. Much, much better than "inception"! - Bryan On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:48 PM, alexis richardson < alexis@...> wrote:
Hi all
In this week's TOC we converged on some possible changes to the Inception tier, that can address issues that have been raised about market perception & confusion. It is most likely that Inception will be replaced with a "Sandbox" tier.
Chris Aniszczyk is drafting a written statement proposing Sandbox and associated changes and clarifications. This will include much of the discussion from the Zoom Chat on this week's TOC call. This draft is under active editing now: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MkuVT7Q6itn9ESW-iyqIXsEqTPBrStXlvzESg94933A/edit
Until the TOC has reviewed the Sandbox proposal we shall suspend voting on Inception projects. I apologise for any delays that are caused by this. For the avoidance of further confusion, Sandbox will be presented *as soon as possible* which I hope means at the next TOC call.
alexis
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Yang Guan via Lists.Cncf.Io <yangguan=google.com@lists.cncf.io> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) >
|
|
As a dog owner (see my sig), I love it!
Imagine all of the other easter eggs we could put in our docs. We could "make governance docs great again!"
thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@... The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog
"alexis richardson" ---02/08/2018 07:44:37 AM---As a dog owner, I object to that. On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Doug Davis <dug@...> wrote
From: "alexis richardson" <alexis@...> To: cncf-toc@... Cc: Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> Date: 02/08/2018 07:44 AM Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION Sent by: cncf-toc@...
As a dog owner, I object to that. On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Doug Davis < dug@...> wrote:
Can we get the phrase "cat poop" added to the formal CNCF definition of Sandbox? That would make our governance docs much more interesting to read.
thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@... The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog
"Bryan Cantrill" ---02/08/2018 05:24:38 AM---I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition
From: "Bryan Cantrill" <bryan@...> To: cncf-toc@... Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Date: 02/08/2018 05:24 AM Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION Sent by: cncf-toc@...
I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition to its positive connotations of fun and play, it's also dirty and filled with sniffling toddlers, broken plastic toys, and the occasional cat poop. Much, much better than "inception"!
- Bryan
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:48 PM, alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
Hi all
In this week's TOC we converged on some possible changes to the Inception tier, that can address issues that have been raised about market perception & confusion. It is most likely that Inception will be replaced with a "Sandbox" tier.
Chris Aniszczyk is drafting a written statement proposing Sandbox and associated changes and clarifications. This will include much of the discussion from the Zoom Chat on this week's TOC call. This draft is under active editing now: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MkuVT7Q6itn9ESW-iyqIXsEqTPBrStXlvzESg94933A/edit
Until the TOC has reviewed the Sandbox proposal we shall suspend voting on Inception projects. I apologise for any delays that are caused by this. For the avoidance of further confusion, Sandbox will be presented *as soon as possible* which I hope means at the next TOC call.
alexis
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
|
|
+1. I think the term "sandbox" is great.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:47 AM, Doug Davis <dug@...> wrote: As a dog owner (see my sig), I love it!
Imagine all of the other easter eggs we could put in our docs. We could "make governance docs great again!"
thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@... The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog
"alexis richardson" ---02/08/2018 07:44:37 AM---As a dog owner, I object to that. On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Doug Davis <dug@...> wrote
From: "alexis richardson" <alexis@...> To: cncf-toc@... Cc: Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> Date: 02/08/2018 07:44 AM Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION Sent by: cncf-toc@...
As a dog owner, I object to that. On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Doug Davis < dug@...> wrote:
Can we get the phrase "cat poop" added to the formal CNCF definition of Sandbox? That would make our governance docs much more interesting to read.
thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@... The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog
"Bryan Cantrill" ---02/08/2018 05:24:38 AM---I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition
From: "Bryan Cantrill" <bryan@...> To: cncf-toc@... Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Date: 02/08/2018 05:24 AM Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION Sent by: cncf-toc@...
I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition to its positive connotations of fun and play, it's also dirty and filled with sniffling toddlers, broken plastic toys, and the occasional cat poop. Much, much better than "inception"!
- Bryan
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:48 PM, alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
Hi all
In this week's TOC we converged on some possible changes to the Inception tier, that can address issues that have been raised about market perception & confusion. It is most likely that Inception will be replaced with a "Sandbox" tier.
Chris Aniszczyk is drafting a written statement proposing Sandbox and associated changes and clarifications. This will include much of the discussion from the Zoom Chat on this week's TOC call. This draft is under active editing now: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MkuVT7Q6itn9ESW-iyqIXsEqTPBrStXlvzESg94933A/edit
Until the TOC has reviewed the Sandbox proposal we shall suspend voting on Inception projects. I apologise for any delays that are caused by this. For the avoidance of further confusion, Sandbox will be presented *as soon as possible* which I hope means at the next TOC call.
alexis
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Yang Guan via Lists.Cncf.Io <yangguan=google.com@lists.cncf.io> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) >
|
|