This is a good idea. DevOpsDays KC is a single track, so we have different concerns, but we run a series of lightening talks where we often put things that are less pertinent but still need exposure l

I’m an organizer in KC, and we do many things to get better submissions. We still have a lot of areas where we can improve, though. We reach out to other local meetups and communities and promote our

This is interesting data. I found the track selection a bit confusing actually. I submitted a session about my experience as an end-user involved in the CloudEvents WG trying to help drive out some of

DevOps Enterprise Summit asks about a lot of transformation related details. We may want to do that as well since many of the end-users are likely using these tools to help move their legacy infrastru

As an end-user, I submitted several this year that weren’t accepted, and I don’t have a team of people to make it sound great, and I don’t speak at a lot of conferences in order to know exactly how to

+1 (non-binding) I second Chase's statement.

Thank you. I’ll check it out. Dan Barker Chief Architect National Association of Insurance Commissioners 1100 Walnut St. Suite 1500 Kansas City, MO 64106 816-783-8669

+1 non-binding, however I’m concerned about the precedent being set of including k8s-only tools. I think this precedent was already set with Telepresence or Rook. The TOC requires a specification to b

+1 non-binding I've been using this project since it was announced. It has a great team behind it who have been very kind in answering questions and providing insights into why decisions are made. It'

+1 (non-binding) Dan Barker Chief Architect National Association of Insurance Commissioners 1100 Walnut St. Suite 1500 Kansas City, MO 64106 816-783-8669