|
[Proposed] NEW CNCF TAG Environmental Sustainability Tech Lead
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
· #7726
·
|
|
[VOTE] Argo for graduation
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
· #7690
·
|
|
[VOTE] Flux for graduation
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
· #7619
·
|
|
Flux Graduation Proposal - Public Comment Period
Hong, thanks for the question. The assessment from TAG Security was a piece of feedback given to Flux. You can see it on the graduation pull request here. We are glad the process is now happening. We
|
Hong, thanks for the question. The assessment from TAG Security was a piece of feedback given to Flux. You can see it on the graduation pull request here. We are glad the process is now happening. We
|
By
Matt Farina
· #7606
·
|
|
Flux Graduation Proposal - Public Comment Period
Hello community, Flux has applied to move from incubation to graduation. I am the TOC sponsor, thanks everyone that helped with the review. PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/796 DD: https://docs.go
|
Hello community, Flux has applied to move from incubation to graduation. I am the TOC sponsor, thanks everyone that helped with the review. PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/796 DD: https://docs.go
|
By
Matt Farina
· #7604
·
|
|
[VOTE] Spiffe/Spire for graduation
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
· #7362
·
|
|
[VOTE] TAG Contributor Strategy Mentoring WG
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
· #7297
·
|
|
[VOTE] Cloud Custodian for incubation
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
· #7262
·
|
|
[VOTE] Kyverno for incubation
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
· #7147
·
|
|
TAG Security Technical Lead Nominations
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
· #7085
·
|
|
[VOTE] WG Environmental Conservation/Sustainability
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
· #6948
·
|
|
Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
I, for one, would love to see the sandbox process be faster and improve. With regard to moving more work to the TAGs, two things come to mind. First, when TAGs did more in the past they were inconsist
|
I, for one, would love to see the sandbox process be faster and improve. With regard to moving more work to the TAGs, two things come to mind. First, when TAGs did more in the past they were inconsist
|
By
Matt Farina
· #6937
·
|
|
[VOTE] Volcano for incubation
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
· #6760
·
|
|
[VOTE] Backstage for incubation
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
· #6726
·
|
|
[VOTE] Kubevirt for inclusion
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
· #6704
·
|
|
[VOTE] Official vote for Knative for inclusion
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
· #6659
·
|
|
[VOTE] In-toto for incubating
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
· #6597
·
|
|
Incubation and End Users question
Hi TOC, In the documentation on the incubation stage it notes that 3 independent end users need to be using the project in production. The definition of an end user is documented elsewhere to provide
|
Hi TOC, In the documentation on the incubation stage it notes that 3 independent end users need to be using the project in production. The definition of an end user is documented elsewhere to provide
|
By
Matt Farina
· #5910
·
|
|
[EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] What do we mean by “Version 1.0”?
I think there is some nuance in here but it's worth discussing. For example, if a project is using SemVer there are a couple parts of the spec that come to mind... If a project doesn't have a 1.0.0 ye
|
I think there is some nuance in here but it's worth discussing. For example, if a project is using SemVer there are a couple parts of the spec that come to mind... If a project doesn't have a 1.0.0 ye
|
By
Matt Farina
· #5604
·
|
|
[URGENT] Impending deletion of Helm 2 releases and charts buckets
Sorry for the confusion. I've asked multiple people at Google about this and I was told it wasn't possible. Thank you for not only clearing up the confusion but pointing out the project-migration docs
|
Sorry for the confusion. I've asked multiple people at Google about this and I was told it wasn't possible. Thank you for not only clearing up the confusion but pointing out the project-migration docs
|
By
Matt Farina
· #5421
·
|
