|
Proposal: add governance review requirement to Graduating DD
TOC, Proposal here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/963 Can discuss at tommorrow's meeting. -- -- Josh Berkus Kubernetes Community Architect OSPO, OCTO
TOC, Proposal here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/963 Can discuss at tommorrow's meeting. -- -- Josh Berkus Kubernetes Community Architect OSPO, OCTO
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7737
·
|
|
🚧 Contributor survey | Please help get the word out
We put a lot of work into getting the survey down to 20 questions. That involved combining some questions where we felt it was safe. Leaving out Personal/Hobby was an oversight, though; we can add it
We put a lot of work into getting the survey down to 20 questions. That involved combining some questions where we felt it was safe. Leaving out Personal/Hobby was an oversight, though; we can add it
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7573
·
|
|
🚧 Contributor survey | Please help get the word out
Tweet/LinkedIn For tweets please use @CloudNativeFdn handle, for LinkedIn, tag the CNCF* Open source contributors, CNCF projects want to hear about your contributor experience. Please take this survey
Tweet/LinkedIn For tweets please use @CloudNativeFdn handle, for LinkedIn, tag the CNCF* Open source contributors, CNCF projects want to hear about your contributor experience. Please take this survey
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7571
·
|
|
[VOTE] CNCF Contributor Strategy New Co-Chair -- please vote!
Hey, TOC: We still need 3 more TOC members to +1 this. Don't leave Catherine hanging! Thanks.
Hey, TOC: We still need 3 more TOC members to +1 this. Don't leave Catherine hanging! Thanks.
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7510
·
|
|
[VOTE] CNCF Contributor Strategy New Co-Chair
TOC, Vote: TAG Contributor Strategy would like to propose Catherine Paganini to be our third co-chair. We would like to nominate Catherine Paganini to be the third co-chair of TAG Contributor Strategy
TOC, Vote: TAG Contributor Strategy would like to propose Catherine Paganini to be our third co-chair. We would like to nominate Catherine Paganini to be the third co-chair of TAG Contributor Strategy
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7388
·
|
|
[VOTE] TAG Contributor Strategy Mentoring WG
Hey, folks: Could we have a few more binding votes on this? The mentoring WG team is eager to get started working on things, and (among other things) we can't make them part of the public CNCF calenda
Hey, folks: Could we have a few more binding votes on this? The mentoring WG team is eager to get started working on things, and (among other things) we can't make them part of the public CNCF calenda
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7269
·
|
|
Real Name Policy for CNCF
For anyone who hasn't been following, the guidance says that the "real name" can be different from your "legal name".
For anyone who hasn't been following, the guidance says that the "real name" can be different from your "legal name".
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7260
·
|
|
Interim CNCF CoCC and New structure of WG for CoCC update
What's the deadline for TAG-appointed approvers? I don't think I've seen one yet.
What's the deadline for TAG-appointed approvers? I don't think I've seen one yet.
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7222
·
|
|
Real Name Policy for CNCF
Can we get a clarification on "Real Names", please? That could resolve this. I'm sure other LF projects aren't turning away trans contributors ... is there language they use?
Can we get a clarification on "Real Names", please? That could resolve this. I'm sure other LF projects aren't turning away trans contributors ... is there language they use?
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7214
·
|
|
Real Name Policy for CNCF
Dims, Can you explain how we reconcile this with the CNCF code of conduct? Asking because a simple reading of it would require "deadnaming" many of our trans contributors. How do we avoid that?
Dims, Can you explain how we reconcile this with the CNCF code of conduct? Asking because a simple reading of it would require "deadnaming" many of our trans contributors. How do we avoid that?
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7211
·
|
|
Mentoring WG for Approval
Dims, Kate, Matt, all: Here's the final on the charter for the Mentoring WG: https://github.com/cncf/tag-contributor-strategy/pull/188 Once you approve this, I'll update references elsewhere. -- -- Jo
Dims, Kate, Matt, all: Here's the final on the charter for the Mentoring WG: https://github.com/cncf/tag-contributor-strategy/pull/188 Once you approve this, I'll update references elsewhere. -- -- Jo
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7202
·
|
|
Comment period for Interim Code of Conduct documentation
These are really excellent ... and complicated! Had some minor feedback around wording in just a couple of places (submitted).
These are really excellent ... and complicated! Had some minor feedback around wording in just a couple of places (submitted).
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7200
·
|
|
TOC Election Results for GB Special Election
Wow, congrats!
By
Josh Berkus
· #7193
·
|
|
Interim CNCF CoCC and New structure of WG for CoCC update
Thank you for incorporating all of the community input into this plan.
Thank you for incorporating all of the community input into this plan.
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7171
·
|
|
Request for Comment: Mentoring WG
I think we need to wait until Tuesday. Then a PR will be coming.
I think we need to wait until Tuesday. Then a PR will be coming.
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7153
·
|
|
Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, 6/14
In addition.
By
Josh Berkus
· #7150
·
|
|
Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, 6/14
Can I suggest again that this kind of feedback get created as an issue in the TOC repo, so that everyone can track it better?
Can I suggest again that this kind of feedback get created as an issue in the TOC repo, so that everyone can track it better?
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7148
·
|
|
[cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
Who is the "we" making these decisions? Did the General Board vote on this approach?
Who is the "we" making these decisions? Did the General Board vote on this approach?
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7120
·
|
|
[cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
That was what I assumed when each group was asked to appoint someone. In TAG-CS, we were already discussing who we would nominate. However, TAG chairs and core maintainers are the most overcommitted p
That was what I assumed when each group was asked to appoint someone. In TAG-CS, we were already discussing who we would nominate. However, TAG chairs and core maintainers are the most overcommitted p
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7106
·
|
|
[cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
I'm confused by the updated criteria. For example, within TAG Contributor Strategy, we have several people who have direct expertise in CoCC formation. They are not our chairs. Shouldn't the COC-WG be
I'm confused by the updated criteria. For example, within TAG Contributor Strategy, we have several people who have direct expertise in CoCC formation. They are not our chairs. Shouldn't the COC-WG be
|
By
Josh Berkus
· #7104
·
|