+1 binding

+1 binding Hats off to the maintainers, sustaining this kind of growth without compromising quality and consistency of design is much harder than it looks...

+1 Do you want us to approve in github also? Or does email voting remain the source of truth?

Hurray! Thank you everyone for your help making this happen, and to the Notary/TUF maintainers for patiently answering all our questions. I look forward to seeing many software distributions made more

Welcome Sam :)

+1

+1

Rob, Zach, to clarify: do you have specific concerns about InfraKit that we should ask Dave to address? My understanding is that 1) InfraKit is OS-agnostic and does not require LinuxKit 2) InfraKit do

Notary has also been shipping to enterprise customers as part of Docker EE. Good to know Vmware has followed suit. If enterprise adoption is a point of evaluation we can put together a few case studie

+1

Yes that's exactly right. What Fedora/RHEL did for the early Linux movement, we are hoping to do for the container movement with Moby/Docker.That is exactly what we are encouraging. Moby is designed t

Hi all, this week Docker launched an important new project: the Moby project (http://mobyproject.org). Moby will allow Docker to better collaborate with the ecosystem in general, and the CNCF in parti

+1

+1 Very excited to see this come together.

Ziad, since you mentioned Docmer here is my take on your question. The type of convergence we're seeing is Kube+containerd and cloudfoundry+containerd. With the donation of containerd to CNCF underway

Hello, I would like to invite the containerd maintainers to discuss a formal proposal to donate containerd into CNCF. When we discussed it in person there seemed in Tahoe there seemed to be strong int

+1

+1 I will add that there is a risk of confusion between "inception projects" and "incubated projects", so CNCF should take special care to clearly advertise the difference. As long as that is done, I

Yes. <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

Yes <cncf-toc@...> wrote: