Sorry yeah, to add to this I would like to stress I don't think you all will ever be able to match the community run conferences like that. Mostly because at the end of the day the foundation does wor

In the Linux world that's equivalent to Linux Conf Australia (and others) which I gave a keynote at this year. Entirely community conference. Lot's of work by the organizers but all the main kernel de

Bounties on bug fixes comes to mind.

Pay the maintainers and high contributors who don't have other means to make money.

Yeah that was what I meant with shared IP. I think there are ways to limit the effect of gamification of the system and I think you all have done a great job of this so far especially with the format

In my opinion the foundations role should be a space for shared IP. And I agreed that people are putting too much importance on being in the foundation. You can do open source without a foundation. Th

+1 non-binding NATS is actually A Thing :)

Quick question: what are the platinum members, the ones who paid the 300k? Do they need to be on the same slide / materials as the projects? Is that written into a contract or something? Also I'm more

I’m +1 only the spec. -1 anything else.