+1 NB

Hi Liz, We may have missed this. I can take a look and get back to you asap. Thanks, Erin

+1 NB

+1 nb

+1 NB

+1 NB

+1 NB

Welcome, Priyanka! Best of luck to you, Dan. Erin

I just want to clarify a few points... I believe in the idea of a sandbox. But what are we trying to solve by changing this process? 1) Are we trying to solve the operation efficiency of the TOC by ma

I have a radical suggestion...Remove the sandbox entirely. Meaning no votes, no TOC optics. Instead, we shepherd new and emergent projects through the SIGs where they are grown with others in the comm

+1 nb

Congrats, Alena. Many many thanks Brian to your infinite wisdom through the years.

This was posted March 4th. https://events.linuxfoundation.org/kubecon-cloudnativecon-europe/attend/novel-coronavirus-update/

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

To add to your thought, Brendan...I believe we should be thorough with our technical due diligence and understand what differentiates one project from another in the same space. And the CNCF, like any

Amen!

Well it appears I have stuck my foot in my mouth...so apologies. It looks like this is the most broad list we have for the CNCF community. Can we safely assume that all the SIGs are also subscribed he

Kris/Matt, Can we please move all these discussions to the public mailing list and/or a PR for sandbox? Now that the repo has been made public, let's invite the other interested parties that aren't ne

Gerred, Would it be possible that we have those discussions in public rather than private meetings (or a read out after) so we can all benefit from things that may have been missed or expectations for