+1 NB On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 5:38 AM Reitbauer, Alois via lists.cncf.io <alois.reitbauer=dynatrace.com@...> wrote:

+Vic Iglesias Right. There are Googlers who can grant additional permissions, but moving the Project would fix this completely. Vic had another suggestion: is it possible to redirect via Helm index fi

That's not correct. Who told you that? As I pointed out on https://github.com/helm/community/issues/114: https://cloud.google.com/resource-manager/docs/project-migration Transferring the GCP Project t

This has been an issue since at least April 2019. The deprecation message is not getting through.

The affected charts are mainly the ones in the official community repo: https://github.com/helm/charts There is a notice in the README. PRs to the charts are still being merged, though at a lower rate

Congratulations to Alena, and thanks to all of the new(er) TOC members for stepping up to the role!

+1 binding

The CNCF Hub looks very Helm-specific and not obviously extensible, so it's not clear to me how it intends to accomplish this: https://github.com/cncf/hub/blob/master/cmd/chart-tracker/worker.go#L141

+1. Thank you, Alexis! The CNCF would not be where it is now without your work and your drive.

CNCF SIGs should not affect Kubernetes SIGs.

+1 binding

+1 binding

+1 binding

I am also happy to cosponsor Kubevirt.

+1 binding

+1 binding

The challenge of documentation was mischaracterized in the GB/TOC meeting today. It's less that contributors don't want to produce good documentation, but that it requires specialized expertise to do

+1 binding From: Liz Rice <liz@...> Date: Wed, May 8, 2019 at 1:56 AM To: <cncf-toc@...>

+1 binding

Thanks for the summary, Eduardo. And sorry this has taken so long. I believe Fluentd is ready for graduation, and would like to call a vote. Adoption of fluentd is widespread, as can be seen on its si