+1 congrats! On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 8:14 PM Stephen Augustus (augustus) via lists.cncf.io <augustus=cisco.com@...> wrote:

congrats!! quite a journey. <ascavarda@...> wrote:

very cool, thank you for doing this! +1

Hi folks, I don't know if it helps here but maybe try to think about "projects first". What is the project here and why? This is more important than forming committees (though they too, have a place).

As an OG member, let me say that the "TOC Contributors" concept was an interim one, that can be deprecated for TAGs and WGs. So I am +1 on shifting focus onto the latter (TAG/WG) and dropping the form

I confess to reading this as "Arun is on a planet" .. and became concerned that we may be over-reaching... Thank you all very much for doing this work alexis

We need VCs to sit on their hands until Incubation

Remember, the point of cncf is not to create ways for committees to sit in judgment over projects. It is to make great projects that enable end user success. That is all.

Stringent implies work, judgement, and value. It seems that scaling wall has been hit already..

Richard how would you formalise this? The goal, IMO, is to reduce the subjective judgment on entry to sandbox, and increase the quantitative aspects

What resources do sandbox projects consume? How is that resource consumption justified? IMO the main effort of a sandbox project should be getting into a position to apply for incubation, or keep goin

+1

+1

Thank you. Good to see!

+1 nb

+1

+1 NB <jim=nirmata.com@...> wrote:

+1 nb

+1 big congratulations to all.

Thank you