+1 NB 😊 From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Amye Scavarda Perrin via lists.cncf.io <ascavarda=linuxfoundation.org@...> Date: Wednesday, 25. May 2022 at 13:05 T

+1 From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of alexis richardson via lists.cncf.io <alexis=weave.works@...> Date: Thursday, 5. May 2022 at 18:30 To: Liz Rice <liz@lizr

TOC-Members, This email is a follow up of a conversation I started with dims. I am asking you to rethink the current Sandbox process – mostly regarding speed. The idea of having a way to collaborate a

+1 NB From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Emily Fox via lists.cncf.io <themoxiefoxatwork=gmail.com@...> Date: Wednesday, 27. April 2022 at 18:35 To: cncf-toc@l

+1 NB This email may contain confidential information. If it appears this message was sent to you by mistake, please let us know of the error. In this case, we also ask that you do not further forward

Hello, TAG App Delivery would like to put forward the proposal to form a new Cooperative Delivery working group and asks for TOC approval voting The cooperative delivery working group focuses on bring

+1, NB From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Bartłomiej Płotka via lists.cncf.io <bwplotka=gmail.com@...> Date: Tuesday, 17. August 2021 at 11:27 To: Mark Carter

+1 NB From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Diego Pinheiro via lists.cncf.io <diego.milhomes=gmail.com@...> Date: Friday, 30. July 2021 at 17:30 To: Davanum Srin

+1, nb From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Amye Scavarda Perrin via lists.cncf.io <ascavarda=linuxfoundation.org@...> Date: Tuesday, 6. July 2021 at 21:33 To:

Dear TOC members, I would like to communicate some planned changes to the team of TAG App Delivery. Two of the current chairs want to hand over their roles as co-chairs: Bryan Liles wants to hand over

Dear TOC members, I would like to communicate some planned changes to the team of TAG App Delivery. Two of the current chairs want to hand over their roles as co-chairs: Bryan Liles wants to hand over

+1 NB From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Zhang, Lei via lists.cncf.io <lei.zhang=alibaba-inc.com@...> Date: Tuesday, 27. April 2021 at 22:44 To: cncf-toc@lis

+1 NB From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Dave Sudia via lists.cncf.io <dave.sudia=upchieve.org@...> Date: Tuesday, 2. March 2021 at 18:33 To: Matt Klein <matt

+1 NB From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Fahad Arshad via lists.cncf.io <fahad.arshad=hobsons.com@...> Date: Tuesday, 23. February 2021 at 15:18 To: cncf-toc@

+1 nb From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Amye Scavarda Perrin via lists.cncf.io" <ascavarda=linuxfoundation.org@...> Reply to: "ascavarda@..." <ascavarda@linuxfound

I am using this list as it most likely reaches the widest audience in the CNCF. In recent discussions in the app delivery SIG we came to the conclusion that a reference application would make sense th

I was listening in to this for a while and wanted to share my observations: I think the general assumption should be that people working on projects have good intentions and should be supported. Some

I wonder, whether this is the right timing to discuss running a dedicated registry for CNCF projects. The CNCF is already working on the arfifact hub project. This could be the first real use case for

+1 nb From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Phil Estes via lists.cncf.io" <estesp=gmail.com@...> Reply to: "estesp@..." <estesp@...> Date: Friday, 31. July 2020 at 17:13 T

+1 nb On 04.06.20, 16:30, "cncf-toc@... on behalf of Anil Vishnoi via lists.cncf.io" <cncf-toc@... on behalf of vishnoianil=gmail.com@...> wrote: +1 nb <ascavarda@linuxf