K3s is a distro, and it is a fork as well. The "opinionated" description always applies to distros (which can be more or less opinionated, of course). If the opinion included things like backported se

"Sandbox is for experiments and early stage projects" Isn't that part of what we are debating here? I wouldn't agree that multi-org projects are incapable of innovation and experiments. It might even

The point of double-blind is not to increase diversity, it is to improve quality. Turns out bias leads people to select based on things other than the quality of the work.

Since the number of submissions is really high, might be ok to require a more in-depth submission to provide enough context for the double-blind assessment. Fewer but better submissions seems like it

It's a good callout, but I think it makes my point even stronger. From https://commons.apache.org/sandbox.html "The Sandbox is a Subversion repository for Commons committers to function as an open wor

As long as we are playing around with names in a non-blocking way, might I add to the list "greenhouse"? In favor of this idea it is more aligned to selective nuturing things as they start to grow, ra

Since the moment is opening up for debate, I will make a stand (again) that we should require cross-org maintainership. I believe this might help with some of Jesse Frazelle's commentary recently as w

I really like the "declarative, dynamic, resilient, scalable". I think it fits the need for the elevator pitch. -Bob

Although the new definition is deeper and more inclusive, I think it is much less approachable especially to an less technical audience. The "container packaged, dynamically managed, micro service ori

Peter, Thank you. I would advocate for building a chart for deployment on Kubernetes in the short run and an operator (much bigger job) over time. I would advise that your team should consider the cha