+1 NB

Cool sounds good. Very excited for this program and seeing how it evolves. Thanks, Matt

Is there more information on how projects will access the credits? This document is mostly about sponsors. The project details are light. Thanks, Matt

+1 NB

+1 NB

+1 NB

Congrats to the new members. It's been a pleasure, all!

+1 binding

> if the TOC is saying "choose another name than IC4EP or something else that wouldn't confuse end users" before we accept the project fully then the project can do that in parallel as we onboard it a

OK then IMO we have to pause this for a bit. Can we finalize the name, get it fully done, and then re-submit the DD with the new name, website, etc. clearly in place?

Also, to be clear, I think Ambassador is a big part of the OSS brand and I had erroneously thought that we were sticking with that name. If we are going to change the name to something entirely new it

I'm sorry for not tracking this more closely, but I agree with Joe on this. I'm not OK with an acronym for something that IMO is too generic. I think you either have to stick with Ambassador or choose

> I object to the name "Ingress Controller for Envoy Proxy” as that also describes Contour. This will create confusion and will be easily misread as "THE Ingress Controller for Envoy Proxy" and will v

All, Ambassador is applying for incubation status: Issue: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/435 DD: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bJhfqEADNI7YSQPyi8Kmb1VvN2FaqxMFRsYvp-vZQLg/edit DD has been revi

+1

+1

+1

+1

+1 binding

+1 binding