Great to have Erin's experience and expertise back on the TOC, congratulations! And thanks to all who put themselves forward - L

+1 NB

+1 NB

+1 NB

LGTM!

Whether a group of people collaborating is called a TAG or a WG should really just be admin. Given the WG already existed, with the TOC’s blessing and support from the community, it should surely be r

+1 nb

Congratulations!

Four levels would increase the total work required to assess a project through their life cycle. There might be good reasons to do it, but I don't see that it would solve the initial problem raised on

I should add, that’s not intended as a criticism - the number of very early stage applications from individuals and single vendors has increased, which over time opened up the question for the TOC of

+1 NB - thank you for starting this initiative

+1 NB - and thanks Erin for taking this over

+1 nb

I think my previous +1 NB may have been on the “unofficial” version of this vote, so just in case here’s my +1 NB on this official edition 😀

+1 non-binding

Hi everyone, Backstage has applied to move from Sandbox to Incubation. As my last piece of work before I step off the TOC, I'm sharing the proposal and Due Diligence document for public comment. I hav

+1 binding

Thanks for these comments Looking at the README for FabEdge I am somewhat confused about the statement that "FabEdge is a CNI" (where I'm taking that to be shorthand for "Kubernetes CNI Plugin" i.e. a

+1 for Dawn (*waves hello*) Organizationally, I'm assuming Maintainers Circle still falls under TAG Contributor Strategy, so the TOC community will continue to hear news from Maintainers Circle at the

+1 binding