|
Clarifying TOC Sponsor and Sandbox entry requirements
Thanks Alexis! This helps a lot, but also highlights the need to get the docs to match the reality so that projects know what is going to be asked of them. We need to get that full questionnaire for I
Thanks Alexis! This helps a lot, but also highlights the need to get the docs to match the reality so that projects know what is going to be asked of them. We need to get that full questionnaire for I
|
By
Liz Rice
· #3360
·
|
|
Clarifying TOC Sponsor and Sandbox entry requirements
Hello TOC folks, We have some slightly conflicting / ambiguous documentation which I’d like to get tidied up (partly inspired by this issue). It seems odd that Sandbox requires two sponsors but other
Hello TOC folks, We have some slightly conflicting / ambiguous documentation which I’d like to get tidied up (partly inspired by this issue). It seems odd that Sandbox requires two sponsors but other
|
By
Liz Rice
· #3358
·
|
|
Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
Very good point! Suggestions on this (or pointers to existing examples) would be welcome and super-helpful
Very good point! Suggestions on this (or pointers to existing examples) would be welcome and super-helpful
|
By
Liz Rice
· #3356
·
|
|
Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
Alexis just shared an idea with me that I think is so great that I wanted to act immediately! This comes out of discussions with several folks at KubeCon and elsewhere about how we can improve diversi
Alexis just shared an idea with me that I think is so great that I wanted to act immediately! This comes out of discussions with several folks at KubeCon and elsewhere about how we can improve diversi
|
By
Liz Rice
· #3335
·
|
|
[VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 binding
By
Liz Rice
· #3327
·
|
|
the challenge of documentation
Great articulation, thank you Brian. IMO this adds more weight to the argument for hiring another writer to help the projects with these doc challenges.
Great articulation, thank you Brian. IMO this adds more weight to the argument for hiring another writer to help the projects with these doc challenges.
|
By
Liz Rice
· #3295
·
|
|
[VOTE] CNCF Storage SIG
+1 binding Liz
By
Liz Rice
· #3283
·
|
|
[VOTE] tikv moving to incubation
+1 binding Liz
By
Liz Rice
· #3282
·
|
|
Introducing ORY Hydra
Hi Aeneas, This looks really interesting and I'd love to learn more about it. Question for the TOC folks (and other interested parties) regarding processes / scaling / new SIGs: should projects like t
Hi Aeneas, This looks really interesting and I'd love to learn more about it. Question for the TOC folks (and other interested parties) regarding processes / scaling / new SIGs: should projects like t
|
By
Liz Rice
· #3244
·
|
|
[VOTE] Archiving Project Process v1.0
+1 binding
By
Liz Rice
· #3240
·
|
|
Archiving process
There is progress on the proposed process for archiving projects - any comments? Thanks, Liz
There is progress on the proposed process for archiving projects - any comments? Thanks, Liz
|
By
Liz Rice
· #3220
·
|
|
Apologies
And I am also on vacation this week and so also apologise for missing TOC tomorrow. Will be back next week though. Liz
And I am also on vacation this week and so also apologise for missing TOC tomorrow. Will be back next week though. Liz
|
By
Liz Rice
· #3207
·
|
|
CNCF Storage SIG - Mission/Purpose/Ownership?
Thanks Saad. Agreed, if we are admitting more projects into the Sandbox, we have to be much clearer about what level of endorsement (or lack of) that implies. I'd like to have some discussion on this
Thanks Saad. Agreed, if we are admitting more projects into the Sandbox, we have to be much clearer about what level of endorsement (or lack of) that implies. I'd like to have some discussion on this
|
By
Liz Rice
· #3205
·
|
|
CNCF Storage SIG - Mission/Purpose/Ownership?
Hi Saad, This is a good discussion to have. I don’t believe it would be right to require SIG sponsorship before a project joins the CNCF, at least at this time, for a couple of reasons: CNCF SIGs are
Hi Saad, This is a good discussion to have. I don’t believe it would be right to require SIG sponsorship before a project joins the CNCF, at least at this time, for a couple of reasons: CNCF SIGs are
|
By
Liz Rice
· #3192
·
|
|
[VOTE] fluentd moving to graduation
+1 binding
By
Liz Rice
· #3113
·
|
|
[VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 binding
By
Liz Rice
· #3088
·
|
|
thought leadership
"Thought leadership" in the sense of innovation - this fundamentally has to come from across the community. The TOC, with support and input from the new SIGs, is curating, not inventing. I doubt that'
"Thought leadership" in the sense of innovation - this fundamentally has to come from across the community. The TOC, with support and input from the new SIGs, is curating, not inventing. I doubt that'
|
By
Liz Rice
· #3060
·
|
|
[VOTE] CNCF SIGs Proposal
+1 binding (yay, my first binding vote!)
+1 binding (yay, my first binding vote!)
|
By
Liz Rice
· #3007
·
|
|
FYI: TOC-selected seat March 2019 - Michelle Noorali
+100!
By
Liz Rice
· #2985
·
|
|
TOC Member Change: Kelsey Hightower -> Liz Rice
Thank you everyone for your kind welcome! Having been elected yesterday I've not been able to rearrange my calendar for today's project presentation call - will join when I can, albeit late!
Thank you everyone for your kind welcome! Having been elected yesterday I've not been able to rearrange my calendar for today's project presentation call - will join when I can, albeit late!
|
By
Liz Rice
· #2977
·
|