Aah – to be clear I was not pointing fingers at anyone in particular :-). Just advocating for unambiguous communication, even to those who may not have English as a first language. Q From: Alexis Rich

I think the proposal skirts around the due diligence issue a bit too much. I think we need to be more direct and a little less British about it, perhaps :). I’ll add some specific comments in the PR t

While I share some of the concerns about the name sandbox (and no, I don’t have any better proposals :-), when considering alternatives like “launchpad” and “runway" I think that we need to be careful

+1 (non-binding) From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Monday, February 26, 2018 at 08:52 To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...

+1 (non-binding). From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...> Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 09:26 To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@....

+1 (non-binding) Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell: 408-320-8917 Office # E2-9 Email: quinton.hoole@h

Thanks Sugu. That answers my question. +1 (non-binding). Q From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@...> Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>

I share Camille’s concern. Note that the only explicit requirement in this regard w.r.t. Incubation level is as follows (from https://www.cncf.io/projects/graduation-criteria/): Document that it is be

In the last message on the email thread on this in November it was mentioned that there were still some outstanding todo’s before the doc could be considered ready of due diligence review. Some of the

Wouldn’t it be preferable to do the preparation of the proposal in a Google Doc, and then commence the actual due diligence exercise with a PR (the way most of the other proposals have worked)? That w

Hi Alexis I don’t see a PR for the NATS proposal? Is there one? Thanks Q From: <cncf-toc-bounces@...> on behalf of Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> Reply-To: Alexis Ri

Me too. Q From: <cncf-toc-bounces@...> on behalf of Camille Fournier via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> Reply-To: Camille Fournier <skamille@...> Date: Monday, December 4, 2017 at 1

I’m busy putting together a draft PR now, that we can iterate on. Any input will be graciously received and included. Q From: Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> Date: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 1

Given how many volunteers we have to assist with technical due diligence exercises, I imagine the question of “what am I expected to do?” will come up increasingly frequently. Should we perhaps preemp

+1 (non-binding) Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell: 408-320-8917 Office # E2-9 Email: quinton.hoole@h

I think we’re good to go, with the caveat that the comparison matrices covering other update frameworks are still somewhat misleading and/or inaccurate (depending on your perspective), and should IMO

Regarding notary/TUF due diligence, there remain some significant and legitimate concerns about the accuracy of the comparison matrix in the slide deck (for example this set of comments). Some updates

Would it make sense to also highlight “CNCF Member” projects, distinct from “CNCF Project”s? The former much less prominently than the latter of course. For example: Oracle Database Amazon Kinesis Etc

+1 (non-binding). Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell: 408-320-8917 Office # E2-9 Email: quinton.hoole@

SGTM, +1 etc. As I’ve mentioned, I am willing, and hopefully capable of contributing to the technical due diligence exercises. Q Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Cen