+1 From:Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> To:CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Date:2019-05-15 00:05:53 Subject:[cncf-toc] [VOTE] tikv moving to incubation tikv has requested to move to

Apologies, I meant TiKV, not OpenEBS. I blame it on jetlag :-) Q From:Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> To:Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>;Liz Rice <liz@...> Cc:Aeneas

+1 to what Chris said. I'd suggest that the TOC ask the Security SIG to do the deep due diligence and produce a brief DD report along the lines of the recent one done for OpenEBS by Xiang and the Stor

+1 From:Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> To:CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Date:2019-05-07 11:18:07 Subject:[cncf-toc] [VOTE] Archiving Project Process v1.0 Hey all, on the TOC call

Hi Chris Please add the CNCF Storage SIG charter. https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/234 Thanks Q ________________________________________ Sent: Monday, May 06, 2019 8:31 AM To: CNCF TOC Subject: [cncf-

SGTM Projects may need more than 2 weeks to respond. Q

Hi Saad Thanks for all your input and pertinent questions. Apologies for taking so long to respond. I think this would be better discussed verbally in person (happy to do that in a public place). Othe

Hi Saad Thanks for your questions. Answers inline below.

Thanks for the presentation. Very informative. The questions I (and Joe) had around HA and scalability are at least partially answered in the installation documentation: https://www.keycloak.org/docs/

+100 to what Liz said. I think that the Storage and Serverless working groups have created very useful "landscape white papers" (see below) to clarify common terminology, ways to evaluate alternative

+1 Thanks for doing the hard work here Brendan and your team, and for providing such a balanced and easy-to-consume summary. And to Torin, Tim and the rest of the OPA crew for the lucid proposal, and

+1 (no longer binding) :-) Q

Awesome! Well deserved Michelle. Great to see even more technical horsepower and passion on the TOC. I look forward to continuing to assist the TOC in any useful way I can. Just yell if you need me :-

Thanks Chris Has anyone been assigned yet to lead the technical due diligence? Thanks Q

Chris, can we put this on the agenda for the next TOC meeting please. I'd like the TOC to have a clear understanding of what's happening with the Cloud-native Network Functions effort, as it's very un

+1 (binding) From:Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> To:CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Date:2019-02-18 08:59:35 Subject:[cncf-toc] [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation containerd ha

And CNCF SIGs please Chris. Thx From:Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> To:CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Date:2019-02-18 13:24:43 Subject:[cncf-toc] TOC Agenda 2/19/2019 Here's the a

Hi TOC The document has been moved to a PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/194 Chris, it looks like we need to do a few updates on our GitHub repo to reflect the new TOC members – the list is out of

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of <Li> Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 at 09:28 To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...> Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] CNCF SIGs Proposal Quinton> Yes,

Yes, although I think that operators themselves will probably also be discussed in most of the SIG’s, as they’re a general-purpose automation mechanism, and may be applied anywhere. So operators for V