+1 non-binding

I think OPA belongs in the top layer but I don't think it fits in any of the existing subcategories. In fact I feel that way about all three. ---- Nick

+1 (non-binding)

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

First off, please take this in the sprit in which it's intended. It's not meant to be snarky or argumentative, (though it will probably sound that way), it's just meant to start a conversation. I've b

Even a max of 3-5 from one vendor would be a significant difference from the 68 from one company, 41 from another.... ---- Nick

+1

I recognize that it's not always that cut-and-dried, BTW; I've been on the selection team for several conferences and sometimes it's just a matter of "there were 10 slots and you ranked #11". But not

Why? You're essentially doing this now when you narrow things down anyway. I don't think it's practical to require a whole deck, but a bit more detail is not an imposition, IMHO. How many people did w

I'm going to say that I agree with you here, but I'm going to play devil's advocate for just a moment. Let's say that JaneSchmoeNativeTool IS better than GNativeTool. Even if Jane Schmoe DOES get a ta

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding