+1 (non-binding) From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 9:50 AM To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject:

+1 on improving the CFP by providing more space for submitters to write a more detailed abstract. In the interest of keeping abstracts shorter (if this is a concern for conference programs) you might

+1 non-binding From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Monday, November 12, 2018 at 11:37 AM To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [

I like the track idea, and I would propose a track specifically for developers working for vendors building tools in the cloud-native ecosystem and their particular concerns around developing stable,

Is there a way to have the ability to add comments and notes directly in the doc? In read-only mode, it is hard to provide much detailed feedback. Thanks, Geri Jennings CyberArk From: <cncf-toc@lists.

+1 non-binding Excited to see this process kick off! From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Monday, March 18, 2019 at 9:48 PM To: CNCF TOC <

+1 nb From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 at 9:30 AM To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [cncf-toc] [V

+1 NB. I look forward to seeing the evolution of CNCF with this SIG in place. On 1/23/20, 8:11 AM, "cncf-toc@... on behalf of Richard Hartmann" <cncf-toc@... on behalf of richih@r

+1 nb (yay!) From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 1:27 PM To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [cnc