+1 binding --brendan

Feel free to go ahead and edit. I created a clone of it before I sent it out to the internet for comment, just in case someone wanted to troll. Edit away! --brendan

Many apologies for the delay in getting this together. Here is the first draft of the sandbox form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1bJhG1MuM981uQXcnBMv4Mj9yfV5_q5Kwk3qhBCLa_5A/edit?usp=sharing --bren

+1, Binding.

Folks, As the ToC Liason, I'd like to call a vote on creating SIG-Observability. You can find the relevant info here: PR: https://github.com/cncf/sig-observability/pull/1 Pretty: https://github.com/cn

I believe we can call a vote on the public mailing list by sending a mail to the main CNCF list. I will do that now.

+1 binding

+1, binding --brendan

+1, binding

100% agree with encouraging diversity and not being king makers. However, I also think that applies within projects, not just between projects. I want to make sure that we adopt tools that encourage a

I'm in full agreement regarding transparency in the CNCF. However, I think the discussion about OperatorHub has more to do with it's intersection with Helm and the Helm Hub as well as whether Operator

+1, looks good to me. --brendan

fwiw, I will only be able to make the first 0.5hr

+1 from me as well. Thanks Paris!

I will definitely ping GitHub folks about this, but I thought it useful to at least document the desired approach in general.

Folks, See: https://github.com/kubernetes-client/javascript/pull/384 Dependabot is automatically generating a PR to update vulnerable dependencies, but of course the CNCF CLA is required, and dependab

+1, binding --brendan

This reminded me that I had a meeting w/ India land at 8am. I'll be there for the second half-hour (8:30-9am) apologies! --brendan

I'm probably not going to be able to make it either...

+1. binding.