Sorry folks, I am not feeling super (nothing sinister, don’t worry!) so I am not going to make it to the meeting today

Welcome Dave, great to have you with us! Liz

I think my wording could be better - the graduation requirement should be for functional community control of the project roadmap (not merely a plan for a community-controlled roadmap)

Thanks everyone who came to the TOC call today - with extra thanks to Alexis for initiating the idea in the first place. I've tried to capture the key points: Problem statement summary: projects that

+1 binding

+1 thanks Torin (TOC folks - this seems an interesting model we should think about in the broader discussion of governance models / steering committees)

I am a big fan of OPA, and in general the project seems to be going well. But it does give me pause to see that open-policy-agent/opa (in particular) is controlled by one organisation Liz

OpenKruise is experimenting with a number of workload-related resource definitions, some of which are enhancements to existing core K8s resources. We're happy to see these experiments and want to supp

Thank you everyone who’s putting such thought into this topic. I would like to get a discussion on this onto the TOC meeting agenda at a point where the SIG Contrib Strategy folks have had a chance to

Not totally sure if this is still the right thread but anyway: +1 binding Thank you TiKV team for addressing the PD concern (and for everything else you are doing with the project!)

+1 binding

+1 binding

Finally reviewing the TiKV graduation application. Mostly it looks great to me but has there been any discussion of TiKV's dependency on https://github.com/pingcap/pd? I’m not familiar with PD so I’m

sandbox projects are early stage / experimental and where we want to enable neutral collaboration. There is no DD so we are not giving any recommendations (Including not recommending for production).

+1 binding

Per Bob's point 3, k3s want a neutral home for further experimentation and collaboration; in my opinion it is undoubtedly cloud native, and it solves a particular problem in a way that lots of folks f

+1 binding

Hi everyone, At our last Sandbox application review meeting, TOC didn't vote on k3s pending a discussion with the K8s Steering Committee on whether k3s makes more sense as a standalone project or as a

+1 binding

+1 binding (and thank you everyone involved in the DD!) Liz