+1 binding

Sorry folks, I've got a conflict for tomorrow's TOC meeting, and I will have to skip this one Liz

I think that's the heart of the confusion / expectation that I'm seeing. (Or even more precisely that anything under v1.0 is seen by many as not production-ready.) Ack that not every project sees it t

Hi folks, Someone I spoke with today said something along the lines “if <this project> is stable, why is it still at v0.something?” and that got me thinking - does it make any sense to expect Graduate

Ah, ok. Sorry, my mistake!

This question is probably six months too late, but didn't CNCF own the Ambasaador trademark (since the project joined Sandbox)?

Bumping this vote, as it would be great to get the new SIG Security leads in place if others on the TOC are comfortable with these nominees ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Justin Cormack

Super that we have these qualified and enthusiastic candidates! I’m happy to call this TOC vote, and give it my +1 for all three nominees Liz

Aha, I see in the public working doc today's meeting is down as cancelled. Enjoy your extra hour!

Hi everyone, Amye is OOO today (I believe unexpectedly) and I’m not quite sure where we are with an agenda for the TOC call today. Does anyone have something they were prepared / planning to discuss?

I really like OPA, and the project is doing tons of things really well, but I am struggling to add a +1 on the voting thread for it. When we move something to graduation, the TOC is sending a strong m

I'm sorry folks, I have a conflict coming up on Tuesday 1st, and I am going to have to skip the TOC meeting Liz

Hi TOC and SIG Security folks On Friday I got a nice preview from Shubhra Kar and his team at the LF about some tools they are building to provide insights and stats for LF (and therefore CNCF) projec

Thanks Chris. We could also require it for TOC members & SIG chairs too

+1 binding

I’d like to see all project maintainers taking this at all maturity levels Probably getting carried away here, but it would be nice if we could automate this, a bit like CLA bots: automatically flaggi

+1 binding

To be clear, what I was suggesting was not intended to “mess with anyone’s plans” - I was simply trying to lay out that if Helm finds itself in a difficult position here, we (TOC) are here to help, be

Thanks Chris. Just noting that we do have the Special Issues process where $$$ are involved to take technical budget issues to the GB, though it sounds unlikely that this would be an affordable item f

It does seem like a hard cut-off is going to hurt people without some further action. I can see two ways the CNCF might be able to help: - Getting the word out. I suspect that a lot of Helm chart crea