+1 binding

+1 binding

+1 binding

+1 binding

Thank you to whoever prompted us in the TOC meeting this week that this nomination (and also the tech lead nomination for SIG Observability) are outstanding! SIG Chairs require a 2/3 TOC vote and I'm

+1 binding

Sorry for the late notice, but after a late-breaking conflict has come up and I'm going to have to miss today's meeting Liz

Chris is suggesting reducing the comment period after a vote is called from two weeks to one week. I can see the attraction, because in practice if people are going to comment it seems they’re likely

Thanks for these thoughts, Quinton 100% agree. As I don't think this is limited to Sandbox, I wonder if this would be better added in, say, the Principles doc, wytd? Yes, the idea is that this should

For anyone who wasn't on today's TOC call: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IlhqnmhSzs3aTPMkp_75JPYz6LD21aK1sNPrBNruDt0/edit#

+1 binding -- Liz Rice - sent from my phone

+1 binding, thanks SIG observability! -- Liz Rice - sent from my phone

+1 binding If Dragonfly does indeed move to incubation, it would be great to have SIG Security do an assessment and give recommendations to the project (the related issue is currently marked inactive)

Hi everyone, Looking forward to meeting with you all tomorrow. We have two slides (minimalist design!) highlighting the TOC priorities we'd like to discuss in the joint GB-TOC session: https://docs.go

+1 binding -- Liz Rice @lizrice | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145

Welcome Alena! And very many thanks, Brian, for all you’ve done to help set the direction of the CNCF over the years. You’ve been a huge influence! -- Liz Rice - sent from my phone

Thanks everyone for a productive call! To summarise the main actions: * The project now known as Artifact Hub will henceforth act like a normal community project, and go through the normal Sandbox sub

+1 binding from me, thank you! -- Liz Rice @lizrice | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145

Lots to unpack here, Chris, and as it’s 11pm I may not do it full justice in this response but I did want to make a couple of quick points: First come, first served project assessment has been a worry

Thanks Dan & Matt for getting this public! We had a brief discussion on this in the closed TOC call yesterday, and it’s clear that many TOC members have questions and ideas around this. We are suggest