+1 non binding

Hi all from a current co-chair :-) Some great constructive ideas here, this is turning into a good discussion. On the double-blinding, I was involved in discussions about this after Austin and again a

Matt, thank you for your thoughtful response. I like your list and your focus on identifying solutions for things that need to be improved. Yaron, by my very quick reckoning in a rather complicated sp

Eughhh, reading this through I fear it might come over as defensive, but since I've collected the information, I'm going ahead regardless. Let's look at the *actual* situation on this serverless track

Only four of the submissions on Knative were from Google! Perhaps it goes to show that a lot of other people are also interested in this technology? Again I go back to my point that a lot of people (a

+1 non binding

I'm not sure I see why a minimum period of time is necessary. There's a set of criteria that a project need to meet in order to cross into Incubation; if it meets those criteria quickly then why artif

+1 non-binding

+1 nb

+1 that "Governance" isn't a great name for this security-related SIG. I'd suggest "Security and Compliance". In many cases end users are concerned not just with security but also with associated stan

Sure - regulations are what folks have to be in compliance with. So long as the SIG doesn't start writing more regulations :-)

+1 nb

Fwiw I think this is pretty cool, but I suspect a lot of parties interested in this comparison would also want to see latency & jitter info added to slide 9. Is that in the pipeline Dan?

Thank you everyone for your kind welcome! Having been elected yesterday I've not been able to rearrange my calendar for today's project presentation call - will join when I can, albeit late!

+100!

+1 binding (yay, my first binding vote!)

"Thought leadership" in the sense of innovation - this fundamentally has to come from across the community. The TOC, with support and input from the new SIGs, is curating, not inventing. I doubt that'

+1 binding

+1 binding

Hi Saad, This is a good discussion to have. I don’t believe it would be right to require SIG sponsorship before a project joins the CNCF, at least at this time, for a couple of reasons: CNCF SIGs are