Hi Alexis Please add (to the CI section of slide 8): · Proposal - A CI Workflow Platform for the CNCF https://goo.gl/50UoRt (as per the email that you kindly forwarded yesterday) Thanks Q From: <cncf-

+1 for containerd and rkt. I don’t know enough about Heron and the related ecosystem to have an on that opinion yet. Q From: <cncf-toc-bounces@...> on behalf of Brian Grant via cncf-toc <cnc

Regarding Kubo, it’s not immediately obvious to me how useful it is in the long term (although I must stress that I’m definitely not a Cloud Foundry expert). Reading the Kubo docs it seems that it is,

Me too please. Q From: <cncf-toc-bounces@...> on behalf of Gianluca Arbezzano via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> Reply-To: Gianluca Arbezzano <gianarb92@...> Date: Wednesday, April

+1 – Awesome progress HH and Denver (and whomever else was involved). Q Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721

I can assist with the Envoy technical due diligence. Regards Q Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell: 408

SGTM, +1 etc. As I’ve mentioned, I am willing, and hopefully capable of contributing to the technical due diligence exercises. Q Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Cen

+1 (non-binding). Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell: 408-320-8917 Office # E2-9 Email: quinton.hoole@

Would it make sense to also highlight “CNCF Member” projects, distinct from “CNCF Project”s? The former much less prominently than the latter of course. For example: Oracle Database Amazon Kinesis Etc

Regarding notary/TUF due diligence, there remain some significant and legitimate concerns about the accuracy of the comparison matrix in the slide deck (for example this set of comments). Some updates

I think we’re good to go, with the caveat that the comparison matrices covering other update frameworks are still somewhat misleading and/or inaccurate (depending on your perspective), and should IMO

+1 (non-binding) Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell: 408-320-8917 Office # E2-9 Email: quinton.hoole@h

Given how many volunteers we have to assist with technical due diligence exercises, I imagine the question of “what am I expected to do?” will come up increasingly frequently. Should we perhaps preemp

I’m busy putting together a draft PR now, that we can iterate on. Any input will be graciously received and included. Q From: Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> Date: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 1

Me too. Q From: <cncf-toc-bounces@...> on behalf of Camille Fournier via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> Reply-To: Camille Fournier <skamille@...> Date: Monday, December 4, 2017 at 1

Hi Alexis I don’t see a PR for the NATS proposal? Is there one? Thanks Q From: <cncf-toc-bounces@...> on behalf of Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> Reply-To: Alexis Ri

Wouldn’t it be preferable to do the preparation of the proposal in a Google Doc, and then commence the actual due diligence exercise with a PR (the way most of the other proposals have worked)? That w

In the last message on the email thread on this in November it was mentioned that there were still some outstanding todo’s before the doc could be considered ready of due diligence review. Some of the

I share Camille’s concern. Note that the only explicit requirement in this regard w.r.t. Incubation level is as follows (from https://www.cncf.io/projects/graduation-criteria/): Document that it is be

Thanks Sugu. That answers my question. +1 (non-binding). Q From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@...> Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>