Yes.

yes Camille Fournier via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> schrieb am Di., 8. März 2016 14:39:

+1

This proposal is fine in itself, but just to round out the other points made in the discussion: it doesn't quite address the issue of how projects might deal with decisions made by the TOC post-incuba

+1

I'm not sure how my name got on there - I won't be attending the conference.

YES

+1

I'm not totally opposed to the try idea in principle or as an end goal - my lack of obvious enthusiasm was more about a) resources (who's going to do it?) and b) putting the cart before the horse - as

My only nit would be that I still find Google Docs far superior to GH pull requests when something is in active draft stage (between stage 2 and 3).

+1 overall

Fellow TOC members: The CoreDNS team has iterated on their project proposal to a final version after feedback and it's now time to vote. Proposal is available here and also embedded below. To kick thi

I will not be able to attend the call this week. Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> schrieb am Di., 20. Sep. 2016, 21:13:

+1

Yes

Yes

+1

I would be interested in hearing/seeing more about practical uses of fission so far. I'd also like to see the documentation fleshed out a bit - it's a little sparse in terms of understanding how this

+1

+1