Fantastic work!

The purpose is documented in the SIG charter that we voted on recently.

The SIGs can do whatever they like! But the final decision is not for delegation.

Saad Unlike K8s TOC & SIGs, the CNCF TOC will own final decisions on project acceptance. alexis <saadali=google.com@...> wrote:

David Thanks. I would prioritise open governance over reducing your committers, but up to you. Re quotas. Any multi-tenant system that holds data for any length of time faces the question of how avail

I am a potential sponsor. for me to buy in: I'd like to see a neutral gov & roadmap plus plans from david on achieving unambiguous neutrality, plus thoughts on what would be useful as a 'spun out' too

want to thank others: - erin - matt f - justin c - sarah a - et al. et al.

does happy dance

I shall miss tomorrow's TOC call due to a conflict

+1 binding

Cheryl, wdyt?

+1 binding

+1 binding

Congratulations Michelle, and thank-you very much Quinton!

welcome!

If so then I assume this article is all a set of misquotes by the journalist: https://techcrunch.com/2019/02/27/open-source-communities-fight-over-telco-market/

+1 binding

https://www.cncf.io/announcement/2019/02/25/cncf-launches-cloud-native-network-functions-cnf-testbed/

Xiang, Below: I don't think that's a "MUST HAVE", but it would be Nice. Well, one aim of all this is that SIGs help to identify project gaps for CNCF, and some of the pre-solicitation and investigatio

RegSec?