|
[RESULT] Cilium approved for Incubation
Congrats!!!
By
alexis richardson
· #6289
·
|
|
đź‘‹ So long folks!
Cheryl Very sad news! At least for those of us not going to Barbados ;-) You have been an amazing leader and champion for the CNCF and End Users. All the best for the future, where I am sure you will
Cheryl Very sad news! At least for those of us not going to Barbados ;-) You have been an amazing leader and champion for the CNCF and End Users. All the best for the future, where I am sure you will
|
By
alexis richardson
· #6089
·
|
|
Nomination of Ed Warnicke for as a TAG Network Co-Chair
+1, nb
By
alexis richardson
· #6068
·
|
|
[VOTE] OpenMetrics for Incubation
+1 nb
By
alexis richardson
· #6001
·
|
|
[VOTE] Linkerd for Graduation
+1, nb
By
alexis richardson
· #5998
·
|
|
TAG App Co-Chairs and Tech Leads - TOC Vote
+1 (nb) for all four
By
alexis richardson
· #5893
·
|
|
FYI: Third Party Deps that have been relicensed to AGPL
"parent companies'", plural, sorry
"parent companies'", plural, sorry
|
By
alexis richardson
· #5839
·
|
|
FYI: Third Party Deps that have been relicensed to AGPL
... And their parent company's other projects, I should add.
... And their parent company's other projects, I should add.
|
By
alexis richardson
· #5838
·
|
|
FYI: Third Party Deps that have been relicensed to AGPL
Isn't it grafana and minio?
Isn't it grafana and minio?
|
By
alexis richardson
· #5836
·
|
|
security & CNCF projects
Hi all Can we have a refresh on this. https://github.com/cncf/sig-security/issues/538#issuecomment-785417458 I think we need to get grown up about security processes for our projects. Alexis
Hi all Can we have a refresh on this. https://github.com/cncf/sig-security/issues/538#issuecomment-785417458 I think we need to get grown up about security processes for our projects. Alexis
|
By
alexis richardson
· #5789
·
|
|
security & CNCF projects
thanks Liz this is a *terrific resource* that costs lots of money & time, and it is useless if we don't make it public and prune out old stuff
thanks Liz this is a *terrific resource* that costs lots of money & time, and it is useless if we don't make it public and prune out old stuff
|
By
alexis richardson
· #5674
·
|
|
security & CNCF projects
I understand this is Beta I believe all of the CNCF community should have equal access.
I understand this is Beta I believe all of the CNCF community should have equal access.
|
By
alexis richardson
· #5672
·
|
|
security & CNCF projects
I strongly disagree Chris, this is a great resource that all should be aware of. Now that we don’t have FPs, can we just publish the data? Please do not assume that end users will not run their own sc
I strongly disagree Chris, this is a great resource that all should be aware of. Now that we don’t have FPs, can we just publish the data? Please do not assume that end users will not run their own sc
|
By
alexis richardson
· #5670
·
|
|
security & CNCF projects
thanks, how do I share these with the flux maintainers and community
thanks, how do I share these with the flux maintainers and community
|
By
alexis richardson
· #5660
·
|
|
security & CNCF projects
Yes, please. To your general point -- I have a view that if Snyk (or similar) offers a free scanning service to CNCF projects, then the community should benefit. These are completely standard scanning
Yes, please. To your general point -- I have a view that if Snyk (or similar) offers a free scanning service to CNCF projects, then the community should benefit. These are completely standard scanning
|
By
alexis richardson
· #5659
·
|
|
security & CNCF projects
I see. Well, I'm not. This info should be open to all, without any barriers whatsoever
I see. Well, I'm not. This info should be open to all, without any barriers whatsoever
|
By
alexis richardson
· #5656
·
|
|
security & CNCF projects
Thanks Chris It would be great if this data was readily accessible. I don't think packing into GH actions provides that, however useful it may be for other purposes
Thanks Chris It would be great if this data was readily accessible. I don't think packing into GH actions provides that, however useful it may be for other purposes
|
By
alexis richardson
· #5652
·
|
|
security & CNCF projects
Hi all Has anyone looked at this? https://security.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/#/ How do we see project data? I wanted to take a look at flux. I had to create a login. Then, I had to "request" a view, whi
Hi all Has anyone looked at this? https://security.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/#/ How do we see project data? I wanted to take a look at flux. I had to create a login. Then, I had to "request" a view, whi
|
By
alexis richardson
· #5650
·
|
|
TOC Election Results for GB and End User Seats
+1 big thank-you to outgoing TOC
+1 big thank-you to outgoing TOC
|
By
alexis richardson
· #5636
·
|
|
[EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] What do we mean by “Version 1.0”?
if CNCF wants to help, then publish some guidelines. Or, people will just do their own thing.
if CNCF wants to help, then publish some guidelines. Or, people will just do their own thing.
|
By
alexis richardson
· #5609
·
|