Echoing Joe's call and amplifying to the TOC Contributors. With Kubecon around the corner, I am sure almost everyone is jammed. <jbeda=vmware.com@...> wrote:

SGTM

so: TOC SIG-Apps & SIG-Runtime WG-Serverless is a 'shared' WG between the 2 SIGs ?

+1 binding

+1 binding

apologies I am running late and may miss today's call. I have reviewed the presentations and would be happy to sync with Liz & the rest of the TOC after the call if needed. alexis

Super post wm

Thanks Yuri and Matt. This has been helpful for me. I realised what was bothering me. I think we should graduate Jaeger; but when we do so I think we should also provide some thoughts on the state of

Ticketmaster is an enterprise. So is Uber but they are the parent Co. Weaveworks is not an enterprise, it is a small isv. Has jaeger found much traction among, say, non members of CNCF? My worry is th

I'm interested in end users who are also willing to self identify as enterprises. Prometheus has a lot of these. I had hoped Jaeger would be similar. Again it's not a deal breaker for me at all, but I

Not that this should be a blocker but how much evidence of enterprise or CSP use is Jaeger seeing? Weaveworks are a happy user, as documented here.

I'm interested

I'm on vacation today and tomorrow and will miss the TOC and App Delivery SIG.

sorry, am on vacation I am supportive but don't feel technically strong enough to sponsor kubevirt, also I think we need to look at some kind of strategic home for these kinds of tools + liz can you s

The second one is better. The one thing that the TOC want to avoid is "lobbying" in which projects get pre-rolled.

Fabian Have you asked all the TOC yet? alexis

Doh. 12th is Monday.

Hi all Following a steer from Liz: Michelle and I have agreed this schedule for getting to a vote on the charter for CNCF App Delivery SIG. 12 Aug (Tuesday) Close TOC / community comments on draft cha

thanks Sarah!

+1 binding