+1 I think this is an excellent suggestion

Chris, Amye, et al With the TOC adding 2 seats, what do people do if they want to stand? More generally as we discussed at Kubecon, how are we making the TOC process more open & inclusive? alexis

Me neither

This is great to see. Well done!

+1 binding

Folks, let's remember this CNCF SIG stuff is new, and it's up to us to shape it right. It could take a bit of time. +1 for a SIG leads f2f at Kubecon.

https://blog.acolyer.org/2019/11/06/ceph-evolution/ Mboi to storage fans :)

Previously we have had a period of general review, and then set a future date for a vote to ensure people make an effort to get comments in. A bit like preparing for an exam I guess. Keep an eye on th

Echoing Joe's call and amplifying to the TOC Contributors. With Kubecon around the corner, I am sure almost everyone is jammed. <jbeda=vmware.com@...> wrote:

SGTM

so: TOC SIG-Apps & SIG-Runtime WG-Serverless is a 'shared' WG between the 2 SIGs ?

+1 binding

+1 binding

apologies I am running late and may miss today's call. I have reviewed the presentations and would be happy to sync with Liz & the rest of the TOC after the call if needed. alexis

Super post wm

Thanks Yuri and Matt. This has been helpful for me. I realised what was bothering me. I think we should graduate Jaeger; but when we do so I think we should also provide some thoughts on the state of

Ticketmaster is an enterprise. So is Uber but they are the parent Co. Weaveworks is not an enterprise, it is a small isv. Has jaeger found much traction among, say, non members of CNCF? My worry is th

I'm interested in end users who are also willing to self identify as enterprises. Prometheus has a lot of these. I had hoped Jaeger would be similar. Again it's not a deal breaker for me at all, but I

Not that this should be a blocker but how much evidence of enterprise or CSP use is Jaeger seeing? Weaveworks are a happy user, as documented here.

I'm interested