|
SIG TOC liaisons
Note that Michelle is app delivery liaison
Note that Michelle is app delivery liaison
|
By
alexis richardson
· #4182
·
|
|
sig-observability: charter proposal, next steps
Excellent to see this. Many thanks Matt.
Excellent to see this. Many thanks Matt.
|
By
alexis richardson
· #4176
·
|
|
TOC Election Results for GB, End User and Maintainer Seats
thank you chris and liz! the essence of community is renewal, so I couldn't be happier than to make way for these new folks a <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
thank you chris and liz! the essence of community is renewal, so I couldn't be happier than to make way for these new folks a <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
By
alexis richardson
· #4163
·
|
|
Jepsen result for etcd 3.4.3
OK - thanks! If we see anything useful in the user base we'll file a PR. <brandon.philips@...> wrote:
OK - thanks! If we see anything useful in the user base we'll file a PR. <brandon.philips@...> wrote:
|
By
alexis richardson
· #4144
·
|
|
Special issues process proposal
This is a very important initiative, thank-you.
This is a very important initiative, thank-you.
|
By
alexis richardson
· #4143
·
|
|
Jepsen result for etcd 3.4.3
Brandon, <brandon.philips@...> wrote: This is great, I don't know how I missed it before. QQ: Are your example configs each using only one VM per cluster? That is not totally clear from the doc
Brandon, <brandon.philips@...> wrote: This is great, I don't know how I missed it before. QQ: Are your example configs each using only one VM per cluster? That is not totally clear from the doc
|
By
alexis richardson
· #4140
·
|
|
Jepsen result for etcd 3.4.3
Big round of applause to everyone involved in this. Please do share any thoughts back with CNCF on what can be done to help etcd continue to be a trusted component of the K8s environment. One side que
Big round of applause to everyone involved in this. Please do share any thoughts back with CNCF on what can be done to help etcd continue to be a trusted component of the K8s environment. One side que
|
By
alexis richardson
· #4137
·
|
|
CNCF SIG Contributor Experience Proposal
Good summary Matt! Paris, just wanted to say thanks for your presentation today. A
Good summary Matt! Paris, just wanted to say thanks for your presentation today. A
|
By
alexis richardson
· #4111
·
|
|
Comment on Increase Sandbox requirement to three sponsors from the TOC
Vinod Great questions. I recommend you look at two paths to offer help - 1) Please get involved in SIG Security. And maybe connect with Keycloak team and ask them what they plan to do next with the SI
Vinod Great questions. I recommend you look at two paths to offer help - 1) Please get involved in SIG Security. And maybe connect with Keycloak team and ask them what they plan to do next with the SI
|
By
alexis richardson
· #4107
·
|
|
Comment on Increase Sandbox requirement to three sponsors from the TOC
Gerred IMO that is very fair comment; and not far from what the TOC is currently hoping to do. Have you spoken with any TOC members or SIG leads about how best to get from here to there? alexis
Gerred IMO that is very fair comment; and not far from what the TOC is currently hoping to do. Have you spoken with any TOC members or SIG leads about how best to get from here to there? alexis
|
By
alexis richardson
· #4080
·
|
|
Comment on Increase Sandbox requirement to three sponsors from the TOC
Vinod Thanks for clarifying that. Normally when people say "partial" they imply agency. I think you are saying that the Process is not clear and (to your eyes) may be broken. Can I ask please: are you
Vinod Thanks for clarifying that. Normally when people say "partial" they imply agency. I think you are saying that the Process is not clear and (to your eyes) may be broken. Can I ask please: are you
|
By
alexis richardson
· #4078
·
|
|
Comment on Increase Sandbox requirement to three sponsors from the TOC
Vinod Who are you accusing of being partial. Alexis
Vinod Who are you accusing of being partial. Alexis
|
By
alexis richardson
· #4076
·
|
|
Comment on Increase Sandbox requirement to three sponsors from the TOC
Vinod The reason I am happy to sponsor Contour is because my team has used it and think it is of a very high quality. I do not need to see a presentation to reach that decision. Regardless of what lev
Vinod The reason I am happy to sponsor Contour is because my team has used it and think it is of a very high quality. I do not need to see a presentation to reach that decision. Regardless of what lev
|
By
alexis richardson
· #4068
·
|
|
Contour to CNCF sandbox
I'd go for Sandbox and figure out details later, but I'm supportive if you want to shoot for incubation and have some good users who can step forward.
I'd go for Sandbox and figure out details later, but I'm supportive if you want to shoot for incubation and have some good users who can step forward.
|
By
alexis richardson
· #4052
·
|
|
[VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 binding
By
alexis richardson
· #4006
·
|
|
TOC Meeting Agenda for 1/7/2020
Apologies I'm on a plane tomorrow
Apologies I'm on a plane tomorrow
|
By
alexis richardson
· #4004
·
|
|
Proposal - change one word in TOC Charter
https://github.com/cncf/foundation/issues/71
https://github.com/cncf/foundation/issues/71
|
By
alexis richardson
· #3995
·
|
|
[TOC] Nominations extended through January 4, 2020 at 12pm Pacific
Thank you very much
By
alexis richardson
· #3990
·
|
|
[VOTE] Increase Sandbox requirement to three sponsors from the TOC
+1 binding
By
alexis richardson
· #3976
·
|
|
Proposal - change one word in TOC Charter
Folks NOTE Clause 6.d.ii in the TOC charter: https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/charter.md#6-technical-oversight-committee-toc It says: "ii. demonstrate an advanced level of professional e
Folks NOTE Clause 6.d.ii in the TOC charter: https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/charter.md#6-technical-oversight-committee-toc It says: "ii. demonstrate an advanced level of professional e
|
By
alexis richardson
· #3971
·
|