Hi, Further to this thread, the CNCF Storage SIG has been prepping a simple questionnaire: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1heH9mGBjvBvA08hUDrlSBrw9ANGSnNGNZkraliTR5H0/edit?usp=sharing The idea was

+1 (non-binding) From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Chris Aniszczyk via Lists.Cncf.Io" <caniszczyk=linuxfoundation.org@...> Reply-To: "caniszczyk@..." <caniszczyk@l

Hi Saad, Thanks for throwing your hat into the ring ! :-) (apologies for the long email, but the info will hopefully benefit the rest of the mailing list too) The CNCF SIGs are being setup to help the

+1 (non-binding)

+1 non-binding

+1 [non-binding] From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Monday, 18 February 2019 at 16:59 To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [cn

+1 non-binding From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Monday, 12 November 2018 at 16:37 To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [cncf

+1 (non-binding)

+1 (non-binding) From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 15:57 To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [cnc

+1 (non-binding) On 29/05/2018, 15:59, "cncf-toc@... on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk" <cncf-toc@... on behalf of caniszczyk@...> wrote: The TOC has invited Helm (http

+1 (non-binding) On 21/05/2018, 09:48, "cncf-toc@... on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk" <cncf-toc@... on behalf of caniszczyk@...> wrote: The TOC worked with the commun

+1 non-binding From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Tuesday, 17 April 2018 at 15:56 To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [cncf-t

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Monday, 26 February 2018 at 16:52 To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...

Following up on this thread and the discussion on the TOC call yesterday, I'd like to see better clarity overall in the marketing of how inception and incubation projects are differentiated. The chang

+1 non-binding

+1 (non-binding)

Count me in too - happy to help. Kind Regards, Alex Alex Chircop CTO - StorageOS @chira001

We are making some updates to the doc based on some of the feedback. I do agree, we need to show how cloud native is different in terms of how you deploy and rebuild a POD, but I also believe that use

Clinton / Yaron, Thank you for the feedback. We will get some of that added to the doc, although we were thinking of covering some of those topics in more depth in future articles. We’ll update the dr