I made the change at the last minute to deal with a spacing issue. I will revert it in the next version and restore CI/CD to the top layer. Apologies.

--

Dan Kohn <mailto:dan@...>

Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation <https://cncf.io/>
tel:+1-415-233-1000

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

The TOC will have to fix this, by going back to the 0.92 structure, which was correct.  And rebuilding from there.

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, 03:06 Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

That's very disappointing

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, 03:05 Camille Fournier <skamille@...> wrote:

It looks like it changed pretty significantly between 0.9.5 and 0.9.6. 

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

Woah.  How did CICD get moved?  Wtf

Landscape 0.92 is authoritative. I'm afraid this new thing is not.

Dan, Chris, any ideas?

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, 02:13 Camille Fournier via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

Can someone point me to the doc or remind me why we decided to put "CI/CD" into the "provisioning" layer? It's a bit of an odd duck there so we must've had a good reason for it.

Thanks,

C

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Dan Kohn via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

You may be interested in the new version of the CNCF Cloud Native Landscape. As always, if you see something wrong, please open at issue at https://github.com/cncf/landscape:

​

--

Dan Kohn <mailto:dan@...>

Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation <https://cncf.io/>
tel:+1-415-233-1000

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

The TOC will have to fix this, by going back to the 0.92 structure, which was correct.  And rebuilding from there.

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, 03:06 Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

That's very disappointing

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, 03:05 Camille Fournier <skamille@...> wrote:

It looks like it changed pretty significantly between 0.9.5 and 0.9.6. 

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

Woah.  How did CICD get moved?  Wtf

Landscape 0.92 is authoritative. I'm afraid this new thing is not.

Dan, Chris, any ideas?

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, 02:13 Camille Fournier via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

Can someone point me to the doc or remind me why we decided to put "CI/CD" into the "provisioning" layer? It's a bit of an odd duck there so we must've had a good reason for it.

Thanks,

C

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Dan Kohn via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

You may be interested in the new version of the CNCF Cloud Native Landscape. As always, if you see something wrong, please open at issue at https://github.com/cncf/landscape:

​

--

Dan Kohn <mailto:dan@linuxfoundation.org>

Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation <https://cncf.io/>
tel:+1-415-233-1000

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

That's very disappointing

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, 03:05 Camille Fournier <skamille@...> wrote:

It looks like it changed pretty significantly between 0.9.5 and 0.9.6. 

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

Woah.  How did CICD get moved?  Wtf

Landscape 0.92 is authoritative. I'm afraid this new thing is not.

Dan, Chris, any ideas?

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, 02:13 Camille Fournier via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

Can someone point me to the doc or remind me why we decided to put "CI/CD" into the "provisioning" layer? It's a bit of an odd duck there so we must've had a good reason for it.

Thanks,

C

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Dan Kohn via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

You may be interested in the new version of the CNCF Cloud Native Landscape. As always, if you see something wrong, please open at issue at https://github.com/cncf/landscape:

​

--

Dan Kohn <mailto:dan@...>

Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation <https://cncf.io/>
tel:+1-415-233-1000

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

It looks like it changed pretty significantly between 0.9.5 and 0.9.6. 

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

Woah.  How did CICD get moved?  Wtf

Landscape 0.92 is authoritative. I'm afraid this new thing is not.

Dan, Chris, any ideas?

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, 02:13 Camille Fournier via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

Can someone point me to the doc or remind me why we decided to put "CI/CD" into the "provisioning" layer? It's a bit of an odd duck there so we must've had a good reason for it.

Thanks,

C

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Dan Kohn via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

You may be interested in the new version of the CNCF Cloud Native Landscape. As always, if you see something wrong, please open at issue at https://github.com/cncf/landscape:

​

--

Dan Kohn <mailto:dan@...>

Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation <https://cncf.io/>
tel:+1-415-233-1000

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

Woah.  How did CICD get moved?  Wtf

Landscape 0.92 is authoritative. I'm afraid this new thing is not.

Dan, Chris, any ideas?

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, 02:13 Camille Fournier via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

Can someone point me to the doc or remind me why we decided to put "CI/CD" into the "provisioning" layer? It's a bit of an odd duck there so we must've had a good reason for it.

Thanks,

C

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Dan Kohn via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

You may be interested in the new version of the CNCF Cloud Native Landscape. As always, if you see something wrong, please open at issue at https://github.com/cncf/landscape:

​

--

Dan Kohn <mailto:dan@linuxfoundation.org>

Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation <https://cncf.io/>
tel:+1-415-233-1000

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

Can someone point me to the doc or remind me why we decided to put "CI/CD" into the "provisioning" layer? It's a bit of an odd duck there so we must've had a good reason for it.

Thanks,

C

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Dan Kohn via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

You may be interested in the new version of the CNCF Cloud Native Landscape. As always, if you see something wrong, please open at issue at https://github.com/cncf/landscape:

​

--

Dan Kohn <mailto:dan@...>

Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation <https://cncf.io/>
tel:+1-415-233-1000

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

You may be interested in the new version of the CNCF Cloud Native Landscape. As always, if you see something wrong, please open at issue at https://github.com/cncf/landscape:

​

--

Dan Kohn <mailto:dan@linuxfoundation.org>

Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation <https://cncf.io/>
tel:+1-415-233-1000

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

+1

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

The TOC has decided to invite Jaeger (https://github.com/uber/jaeger) as an incubation level CNCF project, sponsored by Bryan Cantrill from the TOC:

Jaeger, inspired by Google Dapper (https://research.google.com/pubs/pub36356.html) and OpenZipkin (http://zipkin.io/), is a distributed tracing system that can be used for monitoring microservice-based architectures, including distributed context propagation, distributed transaction monitoring, root cause analysis, service dependency analysis and performance / latency optimization (also integrates with OpenTracing).

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here on GitHub: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/42

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

Thanks!

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

The TOC has decided to invite Jaeger (https://github.com/uber/jaeger) as an incubation level CNCF project, sponsored by Bryan Cantrill from the TOC:

Jaeger, inspired by Google Dapper (https://research.google.com/pubs/pub36356.html) and OpenZipkin (http://zipkin.io/), is a distributed tracing system that can be used for monitoring microservice-based architectures, including distributed context propagation, distributed transaction monitoring, root cause analysis, service dependency analysis and performance / latency optimization (also integrates with OpenTracing).

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here on GitHub: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/42

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

Thanks!

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

The TOC has decided to invite Jaeger (https://github.com/uber/jaeger) as an incubation level CNCF project, sponsored by Bryan Cantrill from the TOC:

Jaeger, inspired by Google Dapper (https://research.google.com/pubs/pub36356.html) and OpenZipkin (http://zipkin.io/), is a distributed tracing system that can be used for monitoring microservice-based architectures, including distributed context propagation, distributed transaction monitoring, root cause analysis, service dependency analysis and performance / latency optimization (also integrates with OpenTracing).

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here on GitHub: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/42

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

Thanks!

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

The TOC has decided to invite Jaeger (https://github.com/uber/jaeger) as an incubation level CNCF project, sponsored by Bryan Cantrill from the TOC:

Jaeger, inspired by Google Dapper (https://research.google.com/pubs/pub36356.html) and OpenZipkin (http://zipkin.io/), is a distributed tracing system that can be used for monitoring microservice-based architectures, including distributed context propagation, distributed transaction monitoring, root cause analysis, service dependency analysis and performance / latency optimization (also integrates with OpenTracing).

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here on GitHub: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/42

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

Thanks!

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

+1

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

The TOC has decided to invite Jaeger (https://github.com/uber/jaeger) as an incubation level CNCF project, sponsored by Bryan Cantrill from the TOC:

Jaeger, inspired by Google Dapper (https://research.google.com/pubs/pub36356.html) and OpenZipkin (http://zipkin.io/), is a distributed tracing system that can be used for monitoring microservice-based architectures, including distributed context propagation, distributed transaction monitoring, root cause analysis, service dependency analysis and performance / latency optimization (also integrates with OpenTracing).

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here on GitHub: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/42

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

Thanks!

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

I'll close the vote early next week to give time for other TOC members to vote in and any other non-binding community votes.

Thanks everyone for voting.

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

and that's six votes

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:53 PM Ken Owens via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

+1

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...g> wrote:

+Ken's new email address so he can vote properly :)

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...g> wrote:

The TOC has decided to invite Envoy (https://github.com/lyft/envoy) as an incubation level CNCF project, sponsored by Alexis Richardson from the TOC:

Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy, communication bus and universal data plane designed for large microservice service mesh architectures. Envoy runs alongside every application and abstracts the network by providing common features in a platform-agnostic manner. When all service traffic in an infrastructure flows via an Envoy mesh, it becomes easy to visualize problem areas via consistent observability, tune overall performance, and add substrate features in a single place.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here on GitHub: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/43

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

Thanks!

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

and that's six votes

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:53 PM Ken Owens via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

+1

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

+Ken's new email address so he can vote properly :)

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

The TOC has decided to invite Envoy (https://github.com/lyft/envoy) as an incubation level CNCF project, sponsored by Alexis Richardson from the TOC:

Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy, communication bus and universal data plane designed for large microservice service mesh architectures. Envoy runs alongside every application and abstracts the network by providing common features in a platform-agnostic manner. When all service traffic in an infrastructure flows via an Envoy mesh, it becomes easy to visualize problem areas via consistent observability, tune overall performance, and add substrate features in a single place.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here on GitHub: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/43

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

Thanks!

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc

+1

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

+Ken's new email address so he can vote properly :)

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

The TOC has decided to invite Envoy (https://github.com/lyft/envoy) as an incubation level CNCF project, sponsored by Alexis Richardson from the TOC:

Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy, communication bus and universal data plane designed for large microservice service mesh architectures. Envoy runs alongside every application and abstracts the network by providing common features in a platform-agnostic manner. When all service traffic in an infrastructure flows via an Envoy mesh, it becomes easy to visualize problem areas via consistent observability, tune overall performance, and add substrate features in a single place.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here on GitHub: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/43

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

Thanks!

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc