Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape
Yaron Haviv <yaronh@...>
I also assume we will soon see a slew of “cloud-native” AI/ML start-ups, where would they sit?
BTW interesting to learn DB2 & Oracle are “cloud-native” now, maybe we should add Lotus Notes 😊
Yaron
From: Alexis Richardson [mailto:alexis@...]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 2:48 PM To: Yaron Haviv <yaronh@...>; Dan Kohn <dan@...>; Benjamin Hindman <benh@...>; Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] New version of Cloud Native Landscape
maybe we should have a whole 'nother 'scape for data
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:45 PM Yaron Haviv <yaronh@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Alexis, there are hundreds of positive changes in the latest version. We can do an 0.9.7 quickly, though. On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape
alexis richardson
maybe we should have a whole 'nother 'scape for data On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:45 PM Yaron Haviv <yaronh@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape
alexis richardson
Dan Please could you revert to the last known good version? Alexis On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, 05:34 Dan Kohn <dan@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
I made the change at the last minute to deal with a spacing issue. I will revert it in the next version and restore CI/CD to the top layer. Apologies. On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape
alexis richardson
The TOC will have to fix this, by going back to the 0.92 structure, which was correct. And rebuilding from there.
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, 03:06 Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape
alexis richardson
That's very disappointing On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, 03:05 Camille Fournier <skamille@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape
Camille Fournier
It looks like it changed pretty significantly between 0.9.5 and 0.9.6. On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote: Woah. How did CICD get moved? Wtf |
|
Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape
alexis richardson
Woah. How did CICD get moved? Wtf
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Landscape 0.92 is authoritative. I'm afraid this new thing is not. Dan, Chris, any ideas? On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, 02:13 Camille Fournier via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape
Pini Reznik
Would be good to add a section for service providers. Especially now, when we have the first batch of certified kubernetes service provides Pini On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 at 18:13, Camille Fournier via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
-- |
|
Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape
Camille Fournier
Can someone point me to the doc or remind me why we decided to put "CI/CD" into the "provisioning" layer? It's a bit of an odd duck there so we must've had a good reason for it. Thanks, C On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Dan Kohn via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Envoy project proposal (incubation)
Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@...>
+1, non-binding.
Dustin Kirkland VP of Product Canonical, Ltd. @dustinkirkland On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote: The TOC has decided to invite Envoy (https://github.com/lyft/envoy) as an |
|
Re: [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation)
Benjamin Hindman
+1 On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Camille Fournier via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
--
Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere ![]() |
|
Re: [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation)
Camille Fournier
+1 On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation)
Naadir Jeewa <naadir@...>
+1 (non-binding) Naadir Jeewa Platform Lead The Scale Factory, |
|
Re: [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation)
Kitson, Clinton <Clinton.Kitson@...>
+1
Clint Kitson
Technical Director
{code} by Dell EMC
CNCF Governing Board Member
---
email: Clinton.Kitson@...
mobile: "+1 424 645 4116"
team: codeDellEMC.com
twitter: "@clintkitson"
github: github.com/clintkitson
From: cncf-toc-bounces@... [cncf-toc-bounces@...] on behalf of Arun Gupta via cncf-toc [cncf-toc@...]
Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 7:25 AM To: Chris Aniszczyk Cc: CNCF TOC Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation) +1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc
<cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation)
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation)
Gary Brown
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation)
Chris Wright
+1! (non-binding)
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote: The TOC has decided to invite Jaeger (https://github.com/uber/jaeger) as an |
|
Re: [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation)
Brian Grant
+1 On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Ken Owens via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|