|
Re: CNCF SWG Agenda for 9/20 8 AM PT
alexis richardson
A Landscape, explained by a white paper, would be Helpful!
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNCF SWG Agenda for 9/20 8 AM PT
FYI for wider awareness ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Benjamin Hindman <benh@...> Date: Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:35 PM Subject: CNCF SWG Agenda for 9/20 8 AM PT To: cncf-wg-storage <cncf-wg-storage@...> For the CNCF SWG on 9/20 I've added two topics based on email threads and discussions that have come from the last SWG meeting and Clint and Steve's presentation to the POC:
I've also updated the meeting minutes. Looking forward to discussing this all with you! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cncf-wg-storage" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cncf-wg-storage+unsubscribe@ To post to this group, send email to cncf-wg-storage@googlegroups. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
|
|
|
|
RFC: CNCF Serverless WG Whitepaper
I mentioned that I would share this work from the CNCF Serverless WG: https://github.com/cncf/wg-serverless Please take a look at it, it's a fairly detailed overview of the serverless landscape (still in draft): https://goo.gl/udD8Fx Also please consider participating in the WG if you're interested in serverless! Thanks! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: FYI: CNCF TOC Meeting 9/19/2017 Agenda
Quinton Hoole
Regarding notary/TUF due diligence, there remain some significant and legitimate concerns about the accuracy of the comparison matrix in the slide deck (for example
this set of comments). Some updates have been made to the matrix in the proposal to address those specific concerns (presumably after the slide deck was prepared), but it’s not clear to
me that even those updates bring the matrix to a point of being accurate. So I don’t think it would be wise to solicit a vote on the basis of the comparison matrix in the slide deck.
Q
From: <cncf-toc-bounces@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...>
Reply-To: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Monday, September 18, 2017 at 14:15 To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [cncf-toc] FYI: CNCF TOC Meeting 9/19/2017 Agenda
|
|
|
|
|
|
FYI: CNCF TOC Meeting 9/19/2017 Agenda
Just a heads up, the TOC is meeting tomorrow, here's the agenda: We will cover information about the TOC principles, TOC election schedule, notary due diligence, GB dev seats and more. Here is also the TOC principles in markdown form ready for final review: Thanks! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Welcome Ihor: New CNCF Dev Advocate
alexis richardson
Welcome. Great news!
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, 18:56 Shawn Preissner via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Welcome Ihor: New CNCF Dev Advocate
Shawn Preissner <spreissner@...>
Excited to officially have you onboard, Ihor!
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:58 AM Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
-- Shawn Preissner The Linux Foundation Cell: +1 (919)257-9591 Web: cncf.io and cncf.io/events Sign up for our newsletter to get inspiration in your inbox: https://www.cncf.io/newsroom/newsletter
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Welcome Ihor: New CNCF Dev Advocate
NASSAUR, DOUGLAS C <dn283x@...>
I second Patrick's comments!! Welcome!!
Regards, Doug
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Welcome Ihor: New CNCF Dev Advocate
Rob Lalonde
Cool! Welcome Ihor!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Rob
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Welcome Ihor: New CNCF Dev Advocate
Annie Fisher <afisher@...>
Welcome, Ihor!!! So happy to have you on the team :) Annie Fisher, MPA CSM Program Manager, The Linux FoundationLocation & Time-zone: San Francisco, CA, PT
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Welcome Ihor: New CNCF Dev Advocate
Patrick Chanezon <patrick.chanezon@...>
Excellent choice: good luck in your new role Ihor! P@
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Welcome Ihor: New CNCF Dev Advocate
Xu Wang
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 10:03 AM, Sebastien Goasguen via cncf-toc cncf-toc@... wrote:
-- Xu Wang CTO & Cofounder, Hyper github/twitter/wechat: @gnawux Hyper_: Make VM run like container
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Welcome Ihor: New CNCF Dev Advocate
Sebastien Goasguen <sebgoa@...>
Great pick, Congrats Ihor ! (now we know were you landed)
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Sarah Conway via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
--
Sebastien Goasguen Senior Director of Cloud Technologies, Bitnami +41 79 367 38 25 @sebgoa
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Welcome Ihor: New CNCF Dev Advocate
Sarah Conway <sconway@...>
Welcome!
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
--
Sarah Conway Senior Director of PR Services The Linux Foundation (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway
|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome Ihor: New CNCF Dev Advocate
Just a heads up, I'm happy to welcome Ihor Dvoretskyi to the CNCF: As many of you are aware, CNCF has grown quite a bit over the last couple of years which is why we have hired a full-time Developer Advocate dedicated to the development, advocacy and community cultivation for CNCF projects. Ihor will still heavily be involved in the Kubernetes community and ensuring that we are doing the best we can for Kubernetes and other CNCF projects as we continue to grow as a foundation. Anyways, welcome Ihor! -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: TOC Principles pull request
alexis richardson
Thanks Dan All, please do take a last look over the g/doc comments. If you see discussion there that you feel is not in GH or still unresolved, please update the GH doc. Alexis
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, 04:01 Dan Kohn via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOC Principles pull request
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
I took the TOC Principles document created by several TOC members and:
1. Converted it to markdown. 2. Left out the notes and comments on the budget. The notes and comments are important (and remain in the original Google Doc), but will hopefully be addressed by the CNCF ServiceDesk and Service Dashboard that we'll be announcing in the next couple weeks. For now, the TOC and I would appreciate your comments on the Principles themselves. If you don't think they adequately describe the way the TOC operates (and/or how it should operate), then please comment on the pull request. Once comments are addressed, the goal is for the TOC to vote that this document represents the TOC Principles, and to have the CNCF governing board vote to endorse the Principles as well. Rendered version Pull request (comments welcome) TOC Principles (i.e., the original document) Thanks. -- Dan Kohn <mailto:dan@...> Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation <https://cncf.io/> tel:+1-415-233-1000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape
Quinton Hoole
Would it make sense to also highlight “CNCF Member” projects, distinct from “CNCF Project”s? The former much less prominently than the latter of course.
For example:
Oracle Database
Amazon Kinesis
Etc.
Q
Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell: 408-320-8917 Office # E2-9 Email: quinton.hoole@... ID#Q00403160
From: <cncf-toc-bounces@...> on behalf of Brian Grant via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...>
Reply-To: Brian Grant <briangrant@...> Date: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 at 18:21 To: Dan Kohn <dan@...> Cc: Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] New version of Cloud Native Landscape
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape
Brian Grant
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Dan Kohn <dan@...> wrote:
But I'm not very familiar with any of those. Most clouds offer them, too. Hashi's comparisons: I'll think more about the layering, but I don't think provisioning is egregiously wrong, as it's a service commonly offered by clouds, configuration management tools, orchestration systems, and so on, which applications usually need in order to be able to authenticate with any other services.
No CNCF projects have graduated incubation yet :-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
In the next version, we'll rename Public cloud to cloud and put the bare metal category next to the public cloud one.
That's done on 0.9.7, along with identifying Jaeger and Envoy as CNCF Projects.
That category is changed to Secure Images. Where would you put a Key Management category? What else would go there?
OK.
I think it might make sense to list as a CNCF project when it exits incubation. Or we could call it a CNCF sub-project, or something like that.
|
|
|
|
