[RESULT] rook project proposal ACCEPTED (inception)
Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that rook has been accepted into CNCF as an INCEPTION level project (sponsored by Ben Hindman): https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57 +1 TOC binding votes (6 / 9): - Jon Boulle: https://lists.cncf.io/g/ - Solomon Hykes: https://lists.cncf.i - Ben Hindman: https://lists.cncf.io/g/ - Sam Lambert: https://lists.cncf.io/g/ - Ken Owens: https://lists.cncf.io/g/ - Brian Grant: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1516 +1 non-binding community votes: - Joseph Jacks: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1456 - Marius Grigoriu: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1458 - Tony Hsu: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1462 - Andrew Randall: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1463 - Nathan Xu: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1464 - Harry Zhang: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1465 - Dan Wilson: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1469 - Tamal Saha: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1470 - Mark Peek: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1485 - Alex Chircop: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1492 Please welcome the rook community! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|||||
|
|||||
Agenda for upcoming CNCF meetings in Feb 2018
alexis richardson
Hi everyone
Thank-you for a very well attended and productive TOC call on Jan 16th. The next call is on Feb 6th, in eight days time. This is a call for Agenda items from the TOC community. I propose the following rough draft agenda for Feb - shown below. If someone proposes something more important or pressing, that will get tabled. alexis Feb 6 Theme: Project Status Tiering: * Graduation reviews: timeline to completion * Inception to Incubation reviews: ditto * Discuss project tiers: - do we want to tweak criteria for entry / promotion Inception > Incubation > Graduation Attic - Mature/Stable, slower moving projects CNCF Github Org? - do we need a Sandbox? idea here is for all CNCF projects to share one sandbox for super-early stage experiments that otherwise have gone into K8s incubator - Sandbox == Inception? - Sandbox is a CNCF Github Org? Health: * Reviews & healthchecks what / when / how? * Service desk what else is needed here? * Project TLC WG? RFC / Volunteers Feb 20 Theme: Working Groups * Purpose * Scope / Authority * Status / Progress * Exit Criteria |
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
shlomi.noach@...
+1 (non-binding)
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
whereshallyoube@...
+1 non-binding
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
Chakri Nelluri
+1 non-binding
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
Brian Grant
Trying again: On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Brian Grant <briangrant@...> wrote:
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)
Brian Grant
Trying again: On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Brian Grant <briangrant@...> wrote:
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
"Nathan Xu <nathan_xu@...>
+1 non-binding ------------------ Nathan Xu Shenzhen Wise2c technology Co.,ltd ------------------ Original ------------------ Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2018 00:50 AM To: "cncf-toc"<cncf-toc@...>; Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation) The TOC has decided to invite Vitess (https://github.com/youtube/vitess) as an INCUBATION level CNCF project, sponsored by Brian Grant from the TOC.
Vitess is a MySQL-compatible data orchestrator/platform. It orchestrates management of MySQL instances and has been serving all YouTube database traffic since 2011. Vitess has grown to encompass tens of thousands of MySQL nodes. It is also used by companies such as HubSpot, Slack and Square. The full project proposal is located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/67 Please vote (+1/0/-1) on this thread... remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
Michael Pawliszyn
+1 (non-binding)
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
+1 non-binding
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
Camille Fournier
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
Ashudeep Sharma
+1 (non-binding)
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
jon@...
+1 non binding
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
Maggie Zhou
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
hmcgonigal@...
+1 non-binding
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
derek@...
+1 (non-binding)
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
Rafael Chacon
+1 (non-binding)
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
Ameet Kotian
+1 (non-binding)
![]() ![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
jscheinblum@...
+1 (non-binding)
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
acharis@...
+1 non-binding
|
|||||
|