Date   

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

alexis richardson
 

+1 binding

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:17 AM, vongosling <fengjia10@...> wrote:
+1 non binding

Best Regards,
Von Gosling, Apache RocketMQ Founder, Linux OpenMessaging Founder

在 2018年1月18日,00:38,Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> 写道:

Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd
(https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd) as an inception project for another
year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats shared
yesterday from the linkerd community:

* 60+ contributors; 50+ releases (2--4 week cadence); 3400+ GH stars
* 1.5m+ Docker Hub pulls; 5--10 billion requests a day
* 1400+ Slack members
* 40+ companies using Linkerd in production. Public ones include Monzo,
CreditKarma, Salesforce, Expedia, BigCommerce, NCBI, PayPal, Taboola, FOX,
and AOL
* Powers the Human Genome Project!

Please vote +1/-1 (remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do
appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support).

Also note that every inception project has to be reviewed on an annual basis
to decide whether it will continue to be a CNCF project or potentially
graduate to another level. We will have another discussion in the near
future about moving/graduating linkerd to another level, along with other
CNCF projects.

Thanks!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719



Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Tamal Saha
 

non-binding +1


Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

DanW@concur.com <danw@...>
 

+1 non-binding

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Date: Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 12:08 PM
To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

 

The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io


Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719




This e-mail message is authorized for use by the intended recipient only and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you received this message in error, please call us immediately at (425) 590-5000 and ask to speak to the message sender. Please do not copy, disseminate, or retain this message unless you are the intended recipient. In addition, to ensure the security of your data, please do not send any unencrypted credit card or personally identifiable information to this email address. Thank you.


Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Sam Lambert <samlambert@...>
 

+1 Binding

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Benjamin Hindman <benh@...> wrote:
+1 binding

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719




--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos

Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere

Follow Us Twitter LinkedIn Facebook YouTube
 



Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Benjamin Hindman
 

+1 binding

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719




--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos

Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere

Follow Us Twitter LinkedIn Facebook YouTube
 


Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Solomon Hykes <solomon@...>
 

+1 binding

On Jan 18, 2018, at 12:08 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Zhang Lei
 

Non-binding +1

I have been played with rook.io these days and it's super dope!


---
Harry Zhang @resouer

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719



Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

nathan_xu@...
 

Non-binding +1
 __
Nathan Xu
Shenzhen Wise2c technology Co.,ltd
Mobile:+86  13713508181

------------------ Original ------------------
Date:  Fri, Jan 19, 2018 04:08 AM
To:  "cncf-toc"<cncf-toc@...>;
Subject:  [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)
 
The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Andrew Randall
 

non-binding +1


On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:09 PM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719



--
Andrew Randall
Co-Founder, VP Partners & Customer Success
Tigera
andy@... | M: +1 510-520-0999 | @andrew_randall 
Follow us: Blog | Twitter | LinkedIn 

Secure Application Connectivity for the Cloud Native World


Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Tony Hsu
 

Non-binding +1


Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

vongosling
 

+1 non binding

Best Regards,
Von Gosling, Apache RocketMQ Founder, Linux OpenMessaging Founder

在 2018年1月18日,00:38,Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> 写道:

Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd (https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd) as an inception project for another year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats shared yesterday from the linkerd community:

* 60+ contributors; 50+ releases (2--4 week cadence); 3400+ GH stars
* 1.5m+ Docker Hub pulls; 5--10 billion requests a day
* 1400+ Slack members
* 40+ companies using Linkerd in production. Public ones include Monzo, CreditKarma, Salesforce, Expedia, BigCommerce, NCBI, PayPal, Taboola, FOX, and AOL
* Powers the Human Genome Project!

Please vote +1/-1 (remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support).

Also note that every inception project has to be reviewed on an annual basis to decide whether it will continue to be a CNCF project or potentially graduate to another level. We will have another discussion in the near future about moving/graduating linkerd to another level, along with other CNCF projects.

Thanks!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Re: RFC: NATS project proposal due diligence

Chris Aniszczyk
 

Let’s say until Feb 6th, which is the next TOC meeting. We can review at that time to see if the TOC feels there’s been enough due diligence to hold a vote or wait further.

On Jan 19, 2018, at 3:52 PM, Erin Boyd <eboyd@...> wrote:

Hi Chris,
Can we create a timeline for the DD starting with this one?
Thanks,
Erin


On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 6:27 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
The NATS community has posted their project proposal on GitHub:

It would be great if the TOC and wider community would perform any due diligence and make any comments on GitHub:


Thanks!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719



Re: RFC: NATS project proposal due diligence

Erin Boyd
 

Hi Chris,
Can we create a timeline for the DD starting with this one?
Thanks,
Erin


On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 6:27 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
The NATS community has posted their project proposal on GitHub:

It would be great if the TOC and wider community would perform any due diligence and make any comments on GitHub:


Thanks!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719



Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Grigoriu, Marius <marius.grigoriu@...>
 

Non-binding +1

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Date: Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 12:08 PM
To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

 

The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io


Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Jonathan Boulle <jon@...>
 

+1 binding

On 19 January 2018 at 15:16, Joseph Jacks <jacks.joe@...> wrote:
Non-binding +1





Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Joseph Jacks <jacks.joe@...>
 

Non-binding +1


RFC: NATS project proposal due diligence

Chris Aniszczyk
 

The NATS community has posted their project proposal on GitHub:

It would be great if the TOC and wider community would perform any due diligence and make any comments on GitHub:


Thanks!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

Brandon DuRette
 

+1 non binding


On Fri, Jan 19, 2018, 12:12 AM Shannon Williams <shannon@...> wrote:

+1 non-binding for me

 

Best Regards,

 

Shannon Williams

shannon@...

+1 650-521-6902

 

From: cncf-toc@... [mailto:cncf-toc@...] On Behalf Of Erin Boyd
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 12:00 PM
To: cncf-toc@...
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

 

+1 non-binding for me, with +1 to Brian Grant on process

 

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Brian Grant via Lists.Cncf.Io <briangrant=google.com@...> wrote:

+1 from me, as well, but we need to talk about the desired process going forward

 

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:55 AM, alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

Here is my 

 

+1

 

Vote 

 

 

On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, 04:36 Brian Grant via Lists.Cncf.Io, <briangrant=google.com@...> wrote:

Contributor diversity is not an explicit criterion at the incubation stage:

 

 

 

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Dan Kohn <dan@...> wrote:

I think the biggest concern is that Buoyant continues to dominate development given that other companies are generally making small patches rather than becoming major contributors. Chart:

 

 

Please note that non-binding votes are encouraged.


--

Dan Kohn <dan@...>

Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io

 

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:24 PM, Duncan Johnston-Watt <duncan.johnstonwatt@...> wrote:

I don't have a binding vote either but I am curious given linkerd's impressive stats why it isn't being promoted?

 

Best

 

Duncan

 

On 17 January 2018 at 20:59, Brandon Dimcheff via Lists.Cncf.Io <brandon=olark.com@...> wrote:

I don't have a vote, but I'd love to see linkerd remain a CNCF project.

- brandon

 

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:20 PM William Morgan <william@...> wrote:

FWIW that article is not 100% correct. Linkerd ships with a control plane (Namerd). This is how these companies are controlling routing policy across Linkerd instances.


-William

 

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Brian Grant via Lists.Cncf.Io <briangrant=google.com@...> wrote:

Different projects make different design tradeoffs.

 

Also, these 2 projects aren't directly comparable.

 

This article explains the difference pretty well:

 

 

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

CNCF allows for competing projects, see our TOC principles for more information on this:

 

Istio currently isn't an official CNCF project but has been invited to formalize a project proposal.

 

For the merits of one project over another, I'd advise you to speak to the respective project communities for that information.

 

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Santosa, Andy <asantosa@...> wrote:

Hi Chris,

Personally, I would like to get clarification of competing component: linkerd vs istio. I learnt for example one company I met in KubeCon converting from linkerd to istio.

 

Regards,

-Andy

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 8:38 AM
To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

 

Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd (https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd) as an inception project for another year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats shared yesterday from the linkerd community:

 

* 60+ contributors; 50+ releases (2--4 week cadence); 3400+ GH stars
* 1.5m+ Docker Hub pulls; 5--10 billion requests a day
* 1400+ Slack members
* 40+ companies using Linkerd in production. Public ones include Monzo, CreditKarma, Salesforce, Expedia, BigCommerce, NCBI, PayPal, Taboola, FOX, and AOL
* Powers the Human Genome Project!

 

Please vote +1/-1 (remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support).

 

Also note that every inception project has to be reviewed on an annual basis to decide whether it will continue to be a CNCF project or potentially graduate to another level. We will have another discussion in the near future about moving/graduating linkerd to another level, along with other CNCF projects.

 

Thanks!

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719



 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

 

 



 

--

Duncan Johnston-Watt

Founder & Chair, Advisory Board

Phone: +44 777 190 2653 | Skype: duncan_johnstonwatt

Twitter: @duncanjw | LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/duncanjohnstonwatt

Cloudsoft Logo.jpg

Stay up to date with everything Cloudsoft:

Twitter_Logo_White_On_Blue.pngYouTube-social-icon_red_48px.png

 

 

 

 


Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

Shannon Williams <shannon@...>
 

+1 non-binding for me

 

Best Regards,

 

Shannon Williams

shannon@...

+1 650-521-6902

 

From: cncf-toc@... [mailto:cncf-toc@...] On Behalf Of Erin Boyd
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 12:00 PM
To: cncf-toc@...
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

 

+1 non-binding for me, with +1 to Brian Grant on process

 

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Brian Grant via Lists.Cncf.Io <briangrant=google.com@...> wrote:

+1 from me, as well, but we need to talk about the desired process going forward

 

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:55 AM, alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

Here is my 

 

+1

 

Vote 

 

 

On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, 04:36 Brian Grant via Lists.Cncf.Io, <briangrant=google.com@...> wrote:

Contributor diversity is not an explicit criterion at the incubation stage:

 

 

 

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Dan Kohn <dan@...> wrote:

I think the biggest concern is that Buoyant continues to dominate development given that other companies are generally making small patches rather than becoming major contributors. Chart:

 

 

Please note that non-binding votes are encouraged.


--

Dan Kohn <dan@...>

Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io

 

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:24 PM, Duncan Johnston-Watt <duncan.johnstonwatt@...> wrote:

I don't have a binding vote either but I am curious given linkerd's impressive stats why it isn't being promoted?

 

Best

 

Duncan

 

On 17 January 2018 at 20:59, Brandon Dimcheff via Lists.Cncf.Io <brandon=olark.com@...> wrote:

I don't have a vote, but I'd love to see linkerd remain a CNCF project.

- brandon

 

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:20 PM William Morgan <william@...> wrote:

FWIW that article is not 100% correct. Linkerd ships with a control plane (Namerd). This is how these companies are controlling routing policy across Linkerd instances.


-William

 

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Brian Grant via Lists.Cncf.Io <briangrant=google.com@...> wrote:

Different projects make different design tradeoffs.

 

Also, these 2 projects aren't directly comparable.

 

This article explains the difference pretty well:

 

 

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

CNCF allows for competing projects, see our TOC principles for more information on this:

 

Istio currently isn't an official CNCF project but has been invited to formalize a project proposal.

 

For the merits of one project over another, I'd advise you to speak to the respective project communities for that information.

 

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Santosa, Andy <asantosa@...> wrote:

Hi Chris,

Personally, I would like to get clarification of competing component: linkerd vs istio. I learnt for example one company I met in KubeCon converting from linkerd to istio.

 

Regards,

-Andy

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 8:38 AM
To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

 

Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd (https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd) as an inception project for another year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats shared yesterday from the linkerd community:

 

* 60+ contributors; 50+ releases (2--4 week cadence); 3400+ GH stars
* 1.5m+ Docker Hub pulls; 5--10 billion requests a day
* 1400+ Slack members
* 40+ companies using Linkerd in production. Public ones include Monzo, CreditKarma, Salesforce, Expedia, BigCommerce, NCBI, PayPal, Taboola, FOX, and AOL
* Powers the Human Genome Project!

 

Please vote +1/-1 (remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support).

 

Also note that every inception project has to be reviewed on an annual basis to decide whether it will continue to be a CNCF project or potentially graduate to another level. We will have another discussion in the near future about moving/graduating linkerd to another level, along with other CNCF projects.

 

Thanks!

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719



 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

 

 



 

--

Duncan Johnston-Watt

Founder & Chair, Advisory Board

Phone: +44 777 190 2653 | Skype: duncan_johnstonwatt

Twitter: @duncanjw | LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/duncanjohnstonwatt

Cloudsoft Logo.jpg

Stay up to date with everything Cloudsoft:

Twitter_Logo_White_On_Blue.pngYouTube-social-icon_red_48px.png

 

 

 

 


[VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Chris Aniszczyk
 

The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719